Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children

Ronald S. Litman, Joseph M. McDonough, Carole L. Marcus, Alan R Schwartz, Denham S. Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We sought to establish the feasibility of measuring upper airway narrowing in spontaneously breathing, anesthetized children using dynamic application of negative airway pressure. A secondary aim was to compare differences in upper airway collapsibility after the administration of sevoflurane or halothane. Subjects were randomized to either drug for inhaled anesthetic induction. Each was adjusted to their 1 MAC value (0.9% for halothane and 2.5% for sevoflurane) and a blinded anesthesia provider held the facemask without performing manual airway opening maneuvers but with inclusion of an oral airway device. Inspiratory flows were measured during partial upper airway obstruction created by an adjustable negative pressure-generating vacuum motor inserted into the anesthesia circuit. Critical closing pressure of the pharynx (Pcrit) was obtained by plotting the peak inspiratory flow of the obstructed breaths against the corresponding negative pressure in the facemask and extrapolating to zero airflow using linear correlation. Fourteen children were enrolled, seven in each anesthetic group. Two children in the halothane group did not develop flow-limited airway obstruction despite negative pressures as low as -9 cm H2O. Pcrit for sevoflurane ranged from -6.7 to -11.6 (mean ± SD, -9.8 ± 1.9) cm H2O. Pcrit for halothane ranged from -8.1 to -33 (mean ± SD, -19.4 ± 9.3) cm H2O (sevoflurane versus halothane, P = 0.048). We conclude that when using dynamic application of negative airway pressure, halothane appears to cause less upper airway obstruction than sevoflurane at equipotent concentrations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)750-754
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume102
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Halothane
Pressure
Airway Obstruction
Anesthetics
Anesthesia
Vacuum
Pharynx
Respiration
sevoflurane
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Litman, R. S., McDonough, J. M., Marcus, C. L., Schwartz, A. R., & Ward, D. S. (2006). Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 102(3), 750-754. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000197695.24281.df

Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children. / Litman, Ronald S.; McDonough, Joseph M.; Marcus, Carole L.; Schwartz, Alan R; Ward, Denham S.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 102, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 750-754.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Litman, RS, McDonough, JM, Marcus, CL, Schwartz, AR & Ward, DS 2006, 'Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children', Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 750-754. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000197695.24281.df
Litman RS, McDonough JM, Marcus CL, Schwartz AR, Ward DS. Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2006 Mar;102(3):750-754. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000197695.24281.df
Litman, Ronald S. ; McDonough, Joseph M. ; Marcus, Carole L. ; Schwartz, Alan R ; Ward, Denham S. / Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2006 ; Vol. 102, No. 3. pp. 750-754.
@article{c7858ab4587344e188045ded4e51172c,
title = "Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children",
abstract = "We sought to establish the feasibility of measuring upper airway narrowing in spontaneously breathing, anesthetized children using dynamic application of negative airway pressure. A secondary aim was to compare differences in upper airway collapsibility after the administration of sevoflurane or halothane. Subjects were randomized to either drug for inhaled anesthetic induction. Each was adjusted to their 1 MAC value (0.9{\%} for halothane and 2.5{\%} for sevoflurane) and a blinded anesthesia provider held the facemask without performing manual airway opening maneuvers but with inclusion of an oral airway device. Inspiratory flows were measured during partial upper airway obstruction created by an adjustable negative pressure-generating vacuum motor inserted into the anesthesia circuit. Critical closing pressure of the pharynx (Pcrit) was obtained by plotting the peak inspiratory flow of the obstructed breaths against the corresponding negative pressure in the facemask and extrapolating to zero airflow using linear correlation. Fourteen children were enrolled, seven in each anesthetic group. Two children in the halothane group did not develop flow-limited airway obstruction despite negative pressures as low as -9 cm H2O. Pcrit for sevoflurane ranged from -6.7 to -11.6 (mean ± SD, -9.8 ± 1.9) cm H2O. Pcrit for halothane ranged from -8.1 to -33 (mean ± SD, -19.4 ± 9.3) cm H2O (sevoflurane versus halothane, P = 0.048). We conclude that when using dynamic application of negative airway pressure, halothane appears to cause less upper airway obstruction than sevoflurane at equipotent concentrations.",
author = "Litman, {Ronald S.} and McDonough, {Joseph M.} and Marcus, {Carole L.} and Schwartz, {Alan R} and Ward, {Denham S.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000197695.24281.df",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "750--754",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Upper airway collapsibility in anesthetized children

AU - Litman, Ronald S.

AU - McDonough, Joseph M.

AU - Marcus, Carole L.

AU - Schwartz, Alan R

AU - Ward, Denham S.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - We sought to establish the feasibility of measuring upper airway narrowing in spontaneously breathing, anesthetized children using dynamic application of negative airway pressure. A secondary aim was to compare differences in upper airway collapsibility after the administration of sevoflurane or halothane. Subjects were randomized to either drug for inhaled anesthetic induction. Each was adjusted to their 1 MAC value (0.9% for halothane and 2.5% for sevoflurane) and a blinded anesthesia provider held the facemask without performing manual airway opening maneuvers but with inclusion of an oral airway device. Inspiratory flows were measured during partial upper airway obstruction created by an adjustable negative pressure-generating vacuum motor inserted into the anesthesia circuit. Critical closing pressure of the pharynx (Pcrit) was obtained by plotting the peak inspiratory flow of the obstructed breaths against the corresponding negative pressure in the facemask and extrapolating to zero airflow using linear correlation. Fourteen children were enrolled, seven in each anesthetic group. Two children in the halothane group did not develop flow-limited airway obstruction despite negative pressures as low as -9 cm H2O. Pcrit for sevoflurane ranged from -6.7 to -11.6 (mean ± SD, -9.8 ± 1.9) cm H2O. Pcrit for halothane ranged from -8.1 to -33 (mean ± SD, -19.4 ± 9.3) cm H2O (sevoflurane versus halothane, P = 0.048). We conclude that when using dynamic application of negative airway pressure, halothane appears to cause less upper airway obstruction than sevoflurane at equipotent concentrations.

AB - We sought to establish the feasibility of measuring upper airway narrowing in spontaneously breathing, anesthetized children using dynamic application of negative airway pressure. A secondary aim was to compare differences in upper airway collapsibility after the administration of sevoflurane or halothane. Subjects were randomized to either drug for inhaled anesthetic induction. Each was adjusted to their 1 MAC value (0.9% for halothane and 2.5% for sevoflurane) and a blinded anesthesia provider held the facemask without performing manual airway opening maneuvers but with inclusion of an oral airway device. Inspiratory flows were measured during partial upper airway obstruction created by an adjustable negative pressure-generating vacuum motor inserted into the anesthesia circuit. Critical closing pressure of the pharynx (Pcrit) was obtained by plotting the peak inspiratory flow of the obstructed breaths against the corresponding negative pressure in the facemask and extrapolating to zero airflow using linear correlation. Fourteen children were enrolled, seven in each anesthetic group. Two children in the halothane group did not develop flow-limited airway obstruction despite negative pressures as low as -9 cm H2O. Pcrit for sevoflurane ranged from -6.7 to -11.6 (mean ± SD, -9.8 ± 1.9) cm H2O. Pcrit for halothane ranged from -8.1 to -33 (mean ± SD, -19.4 ± 9.3) cm H2O (sevoflurane versus halothane, P = 0.048). We conclude that when using dynamic application of negative airway pressure, halothane appears to cause less upper airway obstruction than sevoflurane at equipotent concentrations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644549975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644549975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000197695.24281.df

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000197695.24281.df

M3 - Article

C2 - 16492823

AN - SCOPUS:33644549975

VL - 102

SP - 750

EP - 754

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 3

ER -