Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility

George Wells, Dorcas E. Beaton, Peter Tugwell, Maarten Boers, John R. Kirwan, Clifton O. Bingham, Annelies Boonen, Peter Brooks, Philip G. Conaghan, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Maxime Dougados, Daniel E. Furst, Laure Gossec, Francis Guillemin, Philip Helliwell, Sarah Hewlett, Tore K. Kvien, Robert B. Landewé, Lyn March, Philip J. MeaseMikkel OØstergaard, Lee Simon, Jasvinder A. Singh, Vibeke Strand, Désirée M. Van Der Heijde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The " Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. " Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1005-1010
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Feasibility
  • Outcome And Process Assessment
  • Outcome Measures In Rheumatology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this