Update on vascular access for hemodialysis.

James F. Burdick, W. R. Maley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dialysis as a therapy has become nearly universally available and the ability to provide dialysis and dialysis access over long periods of time has become well established. Unfortunately, technology has yet to provide the perfect dialysis access conduit, one which will not stenose, thrombose, or be prone to infection. Native cephalic vein remains the superior dialysis conduit even 30 years after it was first described. At present, the emphasis in constructing dialysis access must be to attempt to reserve native vein, both in the arm and centrally. The most important decisions remain the ones made at the initiation of dialysis: avoiding subclavian catheters that may lead to subclavian vein stenosis and loss of that extremity for later access; nephrologists making every effort to shelter one extremity for later access formation in the patient who presents with signs of eventual need for dialysis; and if at all possible constructing a native fistula, either forearm or upper arm, which will serve the patient better in the long term, rather than the simpler course of placing a prosthetic graft. Dialysis access planning may need to look 15 to 20 years into the future for the patient who, if not a potential transplant candidate, may remain on dialysis for a very long time. The ability to keep dialysis access functional has improved markedly with the evolution of radiologic methods for thrombolysis and intervention. However, as in other areas of surgery performing the best operation first and avoiding complications is the path that best serves the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-232
Number of pages10
JournalAdvances in Surgery
Volume30
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Blood Vessels
Renal Dialysis
Dialysis
Veins
Pathologic Constriction
Arm
Extremities
Transplants
Subclavian Vein
Forearm
Fistula
Thrombosis
Catheters
Head
Technology
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Update on vascular access for hemodialysis. / Burdick, James F.; Maley, W. R.

In: Advances in Surgery, Vol. 30, 1996, p. 223-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burdick, James F. ; Maley, W. R. / Update on vascular access for hemodialysis. In: Advances in Surgery. 1996 ; Vol. 30. pp. 223-232.
@article{15242f5d285b4d06a1d46e60629ffec2,
title = "Update on vascular access for hemodialysis.",
abstract = "Dialysis as a therapy has become nearly universally available and the ability to provide dialysis and dialysis access over long periods of time has become well established. Unfortunately, technology has yet to provide the perfect dialysis access conduit, one which will not stenose, thrombose, or be prone to infection. Native cephalic vein remains the superior dialysis conduit even 30 years after it was first described. At present, the emphasis in constructing dialysis access must be to attempt to reserve native vein, both in the arm and centrally. The most important decisions remain the ones made at the initiation of dialysis: avoiding subclavian catheters that may lead to subclavian vein stenosis and loss of that extremity for later access; nephrologists making every effort to shelter one extremity for later access formation in the patient who presents with signs of eventual need for dialysis; and if at all possible constructing a native fistula, either forearm or upper arm, which will serve the patient better in the long term, rather than the simpler course of placing a prosthetic graft. Dialysis access planning may need to look 15 to 20 years into the future for the patient who, if not a potential transplant candidate, may remain on dialysis for a very long time. The ability to keep dialysis access functional has improved markedly with the evolution of radiologic methods for thrombolysis and intervention. However, as in other areas of surgery performing the best operation first and avoiding complications is the path that best serves the patient.",
author = "Burdick, {James F.} and Maley, {W. R.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "223--232",
journal = "Advances in Surgery",
issn = "0065-3411",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Update on vascular access for hemodialysis.

AU - Burdick, James F.

AU - Maley, W. R.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Dialysis as a therapy has become nearly universally available and the ability to provide dialysis and dialysis access over long periods of time has become well established. Unfortunately, technology has yet to provide the perfect dialysis access conduit, one which will not stenose, thrombose, or be prone to infection. Native cephalic vein remains the superior dialysis conduit even 30 years after it was first described. At present, the emphasis in constructing dialysis access must be to attempt to reserve native vein, both in the arm and centrally. The most important decisions remain the ones made at the initiation of dialysis: avoiding subclavian catheters that may lead to subclavian vein stenosis and loss of that extremity for later access; nephrologists making every effort to shelter one extremity for later access formation in the patient who presents with signs of eventual need for dialysis; and if at all possible constructing a native fistula, either forearm or upper arm, which will serve the patient better in the long term, rather than the simpler course of placing a prosthetic graft. Dialysis access planning may need to look 15 to 20 years into the future for the patient who, if not a potential transplant candidate, may remain on dialysis for a very long time. The ability to keep dialysis access functional has improved markedly with the evolution of radiologic methods for thrombolysis and intervention. However, as in other areas of surgery performing the best operation first and avoiding complications is the path that best serves the patient.

AB - Dialysis as a therapy has become nearly universally available and the ability to provide dialysis and dialysis access over long periods of time has become well established. Unfortunately, technology has yet to provide the perfect dialysis access conduit, one which will not stenose, thrombose, or be prone to infection. Native cephalic vein remains the superior dialysis conduit even 30 years after it was first described. At present, the emphasis in constructing dialysis access must be to attempt to reserve native vein, both in the arm and centrally. The most important decisions remain the ones made at the initiation of dialysis: avoiding subclavian catheters that may lead to subclavian vein stenosis and loss of that extremity for later access; nephrologists making every effort to shelter one extremity for later access formation in the patient who presents with signs of eventual need for dialysis; and if at all possible constructing a native fistula, either forearm or upper arm, which will serve the patient better in the long term, rather than the simpler course of placing a prosthetic graft. Dialysis access planning may need to look 15 to 20 years into the future for the patient who, if not a potential transplant candidate, may remain on dialysis for a very long time. The ability to keep dialysis access functional has improved markedly with the evolution of radiologic methods for thrombolysis and intervention. However, as in other areas of surgery performing the best operation first and avoiding complications is the path that best serves the patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030330781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030330781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8960338

AN - SCOPUS:0030330781

VL - 30

SP - 223

EP - 232

JO - Advances in Surgery

JF - Advances in Surgery

SN - 0065-3411

ER -