Update on Insect Sting Anaphylaxis

David B.K. Golden

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of Review: This review describes improvement in diagnostic accuracy, prediction of outcomes, identifying high-risk factors, and refinements of treatment that continue to evolve over the past 5–10 years. Recent Findings: The risk of anaphylaxis is relatively low (< 5%) in patients with previous large local reactions or strictly cutaneous systemic reactions, but much higher in those with moderate-to-severe anaphylaxis (40%–70%) or mastocytosis (> 90%). Use of recombinant venom allergens and basophil activation tests may improve diagnostic accuracy. Elevated serum tryptase (and possible mastocytosis) occurs in 10% of patients with insect sting allergy, and in 25% of those with hypotensive reactions. Rush VIT is proven safe and rapidly effective. There are known high-risk factors that justify treatment beyond 5 years. Summary: Diagnostic accuracy and prediction of risk have improved in recent years. There are still knowledge gaps related to prediction and management of risk with current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number16
JournalCurrent allergy and asthma reports
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Anaphylaxis
  • Hymenoptera venom allergy
  • Insect sting allergy
  • Venom immunotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Update on Insect Sting Anaphylaxis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this