Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines

Andrew N. Hashikawa, Young J. Juhn, Mark Nimmer, Kristen Copeland, Li Shun-Hwa, Pippa Simpson, Martha Wood Stevens, David C. Brousseau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: No study has evaluated the association between state endorsement of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American Public Health Association (APHA) national guidelines and unnecessary exclusion decisions. We sought to determine the rate of unnecessary exclusion decisions by child care directors in a state that endorses AAP/APHA guidelines and to identify factors that are associated with higher unnecessary exclusion decisions. METHODS: A telephone survey was administered to directors in metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Directors were randomly sampled from a list of 971 registered centers. Director, center, and neighborhood characteristics were obtained. Directors reported whether immediate exclusion was indicated for 5 vignettes that featured children with mild illness that do not require exclusion by AAP/APHA guidelines. Weighted data were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was used to identify factors that were associated with directors' exclusion decisions. RESULTS: A total of 305 directors completed the survey. Overall, directors would unnecessarily exclude 57% of children. More than 62% had never heard of the AAP/APHA guidelines. Regression analysis showed fewer exclusions among more experienced compared with less experienced directors, among larger centers compared with smaller centers, and among centers that were located in areas with a higher percentage of female heads of household. Centers with ≤10% children on state-assisted tuition excluded more. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of inappropriate exclusion persist despite state endorsement of AAP/APHA guidelines. Focused initial and ongoing training of directors regarding AAP/APHA guidelines may help to reduce high rates of unnecessary exclusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1003-1009
Number of pages7
JournalPediatrics
Volume125
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

American Public Health Association
Child Care
Guidelines
Pediatrics
Regression Analysis
Telephone

Keywords

  • Child care
  • Exclusion
  • Mild illness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Hashikawa, A. N., Juhn, Y. J., Nimmer, M., Copeland, K., Shun-Hwa, L., Simpson, P., ... Brousseau, D. C. (2010). Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines. Pediatrics, 125(5), 1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2283

Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines. / Hashikawa, Andrew N.; Juhn, Young J.; Nimmer, Mark; Copeland, Kristen; Shun-Hwa, Li; Simpson, Pippa; Stevens, Martha Wood; Brousseau, David C.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 125, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 1003-1009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hashikawa, AN, Juhn, YJ, Nimmer, M, Copeland, K, Shun-Hwa, L, Simpson, P, Stevens, MW & Brousseau, DC 2010, 'Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines', Pediatrics, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2283
Hashikawa AN, Juhn YJ, Nimmer M, Copeland K, Shun-Hwa L, Simpson P et al. Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2283
Hashikawa, Andrew N. ; Juhn, Young J. ; Nimmer, Mark ; Copeland, Kristen ; Shun-Hwa, Li ; Simpson, Pippa ; Stevens, Martha Wood ; Brousseau, David C. / Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines. In: Pediatrics. 2010 ; Vol. 125, No. 5. pp. 1003-1009.
@article{0ecd8f14784a4ec692fe0d424cd2c26c,
title = "Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: No study has evaluated the association between state endorsement of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American Public Health Association (APHA) national guidelines and unnecessary exclusion decisions. We sought to determine the rate of unnecessary exclusion decisions by child care directors in a state that endorses AAP/APHA guidelines and to identify factors that are associated with higher unnecessary exclusion decisions. METHODS: A telephone survey was administered to directors in metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Directors were randomly sampled from a list of 971 registered centers. Director, center, and neighborhood characteristics were obtained. Directors reported whether immediate exclusion was indicated for 5 vignettes that featured children with mild illness that do not require exclusion by AAP/APHA guidelines. Weighted data were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was used to identify factors that were associated with directors' exclusion decisions. RESULTS: A total of 305 directors completed the survey. Overall, directors would unnecessarily exclude 57{\%} of children. More than 62{\%} had never heard of the AAP/APHA guidelines. Regression analysis showed fewer exclusions among more experienced compared with less experienced directors, among larger centers compared with smaller centers, and among centers that were located in areas with a higher percentage of female heads of household. Centers with ≤10{\%} children on state-assisted tuition excluded more. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of inappropriate exclusion persist despite state endorsement of AAP/APHA guidelines. Focused initial and ongoing training of directors regarding AAP/APHA guidelines may help to reduce high rates of unnecessary exclusions.",
keywords = "Child care, Exclusion, Mild illness",
author = "Hashikawa, {Andrew N.} and Juhn, {Young J.} and Mark Nimmer and Kristen Copeland and Li Shun-Hwa and Pippa Simpson and Stevens, {Martha Wood} and Brousseau, {David C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2009-2283",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "1003--1009",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unnecessary child care exclusions in a state that endorses national exclusion guidelines

AU - Hashikawa, Andrew N.

AU - Juhn, Young J.

AU - Nimmer, Mark

AU - Copeland, Kristen

AU - Shun-Hwa, Li

AU - Simpson, Pippa

AU - Stevens, Martha Wood

AU - Brousseau, David C.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: No study has evaluated the association between state endorsement of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American Public Health Association (APHA) national guidelines and unnecessary exclusion decisions. We sought to determine the rate of unnecessary exclusion decisions by child care directors in a state that endorses AAP/APHA guidelines and to identify factors that are associated with higher unnecessary exclusion decisions. METHODS: A telephone survey was administered to directors in metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Directors were randomly sampled from a list of 971 registered centers. Director, center, and neighborhood characteristics were obtained. Directors reported whether immediate exclusion was indicated for 5 vignettes that featured children with mild illness that do not require exclusion by AAP/APHA guidelines. Weighted data were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was used to identify factors that were associated with directors' exclusion decisions. RESULTS: A total of 305 directors completed the survey. Overall, directors would unnecessarily exclude 57% of children. More than 62% had never heard of the AAP/APHA guidelines. Regression analysis showed fewer exclusions among more experienced compared with less experienced directors, among larger centers compared with smaller centers, and among centers that were located in areas with a higher percentage of female heads of household. Centers with ≤10% children on state-assisted tuition excluded more. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of inappropriate exclusion persist despite state endorsement of AAP/APHA guidelines. Focused initial and ongoing training of directors regarding AAP/APHA guidelines may help to reduce high rates of unnecessary exclusions.

AB - OBJECTIVE: No study has evaluated the association between state endorsement of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American Public Health Association (APHA) national guidelines and unnecessary exclusion decisions. We sought to determine the rate of unnecessary exclusion decisions by child care directors in a state that endorses AAP/APHA guidelines and to identify factors that are associated with higher unnecessary exclusion decisions. METHODS: A telephone survey was administered to directors in metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Directors were randomly sampled from a list of 971 registered centers. Director, center, and neighborhood characteristics were obtained. Directors reported whether immediate exclusion was indicated for 5 vignettes that featured children with mild illness that do not require exclusion by AAP/APHA guidelines. Weighted data were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was used to identify factors that were associated with directors' exclusion decisions. RESULTS: A total of 305 directors completed the survey. Overall, directors would unnecessarily exclude 57% of children. More than 62% had never heard of the AAP/APHA guidelines. Regression analysis showed fewer exclusions among more experienced compared with less experienced directors, among larger centers compared with smaller centers, and among centers that were located in areas with a higher percentage of female heads of household. Centers with ≤10% children on state-assisted tuition excluded more. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of inappropriate exclusion persist despite state endorsement of AAP/APHA guidelines. Focused initial and ongoing training of directors regarding AAP/APHA guidelines may help to reduce high rates of unnecessary exclusions.

KW - Child care

KW - Exclusion

KW - Mild illness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951867361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951867361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2009-2283

DO - 10.1542/peds.2009-2283

M3 - Article

C2 - 20403929

AN - SCOPUS:77951867361

VL - 125

SP - 1003

EP - 1009

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 5

ER -