Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care: A systematic review

Lawrence S Wissow, Jonathan Brown, Kate E. Fothergill, Anne Gadomski, Karen Hacker, Peter Salmon, Rachel Zelkowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care is recommended, but studies report slow uptake and low rates of patient follow-through after referral to specialized services. This review examined possible explanations related to the process of screening, focusing on how parents and youth are engaged, and how providers evaluate and use screening results. Method A narrative synthesis was developed after a systematic review of 3 databases (plus follow-up of citations, expert recommendations, and checks for multiple publications about the same study). Searching identified 1,188 titles, and of these, 186 full-text articles were reviewed. Two authors extracted data from 45 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results Published studies report few details about how mental health screens were administered, including how clinicians explain their purpose or confidentiality, or whether help was provided for language, literacy, or disability problems. Although they were not addressed directly in the studies reviewed, uptake and detection rates appeared to vary with means of administration. Screening framed as universal, confidential, and intended to optimize attention to patient concerns increased acceptability. Studies said little about how providers were taught to explore screen results. Screening increased referrals, but many still followed negative screens, in some cases because of parent concerns apparently not reflected by screen results but possibly stemming from screen-prompted discussions. Conclusions Little research has addressed the process of engaging patients in mental health screening in pediatric primary care or how clinicians can best use screening results. The literature does offer suggestions for better clinical practice and research that may lead to improvements in uptake and outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1134-1147
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume52
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Mental Health
Pediatrics
Referral and Consultation
Confidentiality
Research
Publications
Language
Parents
Databases
Literacy

Keywords

  • mental health
  • patient engagement
  • pediatrics
  • primary care
  • screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Wissow, L. S., Brown, J., Fothergill, K. E., Gadomski, A., Hacker, K., Salmon, P., & Zelkowitz, R. (2013). Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care: A systematic review. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(11), 1134-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.013

Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care : A systematic review. / Wissow, Lawrence S; Brown, Jonathan; Fothergill, Kate E.; Gadomski, Anne; Hacker, Karen; Salmon, Peter; Zelkowitz, Rachel.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 52, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 1134-1147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wissow, LS, Brown, J, Fothergill, KE, Gadomski, A, Hacker, K, Salmon, P & Zelkowitz, R 2013, 'Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care: A systematic review', Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1134-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.013
Wissow, Lawrence S ; Brown, Jonathan ; Fothergill, Kate E. ; Gadomski, Anne ; Hacker, Karen ; Salmon, Peter ; Zelkowitz, Rachel. / Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care : A systematic review. In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2013 ; Vol. 52, No. 11. pp. 1134-1147.
@article{65aa749cf43145b181ec261c159bd5c6,
title = "Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objective Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care is recommended, but studies report slow uptake and low rates of patient follow-through after referral to specialized services. This review examined possible explanations related to the process of screening, focusing on how parents and youth are engaged, and how providers evaluate and use screening results. Method A narrative synthesis was developed after a systematic review of 3 databases (plus follow-up of citations, expert recommendations, and checks for multiple publications about the same study). Searching identified 1,188 titles, and of these, 186 full-text articles were reviewed. Two authors extracted data from 45 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results Published studies report few details about how mental health screens were administered, including how clinicians explain their purpose or confidentiality, or whether help was provided for language, literacy, or disability problems. Although they were not addressed directly in the studies reviewed, uptake and detection rates appeared to vary with means of administration. Screening framed as universal, confidential, and intended to optimize attention to patient concerns increased acceptability. Studies said little about how providers were taught to explore screen results. Screening increased referrals, but many still followed negative screens, in some cases because of parent concerns apparently not reflected by screen results but possibly stemming from screen-prompted discussions. Conclusions Little research has addressed the process of engaging patients in mental health screening in pediatric primary care or how clinicians can best use screening results. The literature does offer suggestions for better clinical practice and research that may lead to improvements in uptake and outcome.",
keywords = "mental health, patient engagement, pediatrics, primary care, screening",
author = "Wissow, {Lawrence S} and Jonathan Brown and Fothergill, {Kate E.} and Anne Gadomski and Karen Hacker and Peter Salmon and Rachel Zelkowitz",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "1134--1147",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Wissow, Lawrence S

AU - Brown, Jonathan

AU - Fothergill, Kate E.

AU - Gadomski, Anne

AU - Hacker, Karen

AU - Salmon, Peter

AU - Zelkowitz, Rachel

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Objective Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care is recommended, but studies report slow uptake and low rates of patient follow-through after referral to specialized services. This review examined possible explanations related to the process of screening, focusing on how parents and youth are engaged, and how providers evaluate and use screening results. Method A narrative synthesis was developed after a systematic review of 3 databases (plus follow-up of citations, expert recommendations, and checks for multiple publications about the same study). Searching identified 1,188 titles, and of these, 186 full-text articles were reviewed. Two authors extracted data from 45 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results Published studies report few details about how mental health screens were administered, including how clinicians explain their purpose or confidentiality, or whether help was provided for language, literacy, or disability problems. Although they were not addressed directly in the studies reviewed, uptake and detection rates appeared to vary with means of administration. Screening framed as universal, confidential, and intended to optimize attention to patient concerns increased acceptability. Studies said little about how providers were taught to explore screen results. Screening increased referrals, but many still followed negative screens, in some cases because of parent concerns apparently not reflected by screen results but possibly stemming from screen-prompted discussions. Conclusions Little research has addressed the process of engaging patients in mental health screening in pediatric primary care or how clinicians can best use screening results. The literature does offer suggestions for better clinical practice and research that may lead to improvements in uptake and outcome.

AB - Objective Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care is recommended, but studies report slow uptake and low rates of patient follow-through after referral to specialized services. This review examined possible explanations related to the process of screening, focusing on how parents and youth are engaged, and how providers evaluate and use screening results. Method A narrative synthesis was developed after a systematic review of 3 databases (plus follow-up of citations, expert recommendations, and checks for multiple publications about the same study). Searching identified 1,188 titles, and of these, 186 full-text articles were reviewed. Two authors extracted data from 45 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results Published studies report few details about how mental health screens were administered, including how clinicians explain their purpose or confidentiality, or whether help was provided for language, literacy, or disability problems. Although they were not addressed directly in the studies reviewed, uptake and detection rates appeared to vary with means of administration. Screening framed as universal, confidential, and intended to optimize attention to patient concerns increased acceptability. Studies said little about how providers were taught to explore screen results. Screening increased referrals, but many still followed negative screens, in some cases because of parent concerns apparently not reflected by screen results but possibly stemming from screen-prompted discussions. Conclusions Little research has addressed the process of engaging patients in mental health screening in pediatric primary care or how clinicians can best use screening results. The literature does offer suggestions for better clinical practice and research that may lead to improvements in uptake and outcome.

KW - mental health

KW - patient engagement

KW - pediatrics

KW - primary care

KW - screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886429584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886429584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 24157388

AN - SCOPUS:84886429584

VL - 52

SP - 1134

EP - 1147

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 11

ER -