Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location

Karen Buch, Adham Mottalib, Rohini Narahari Nadgir, Akifumi Fujita, Kotaro Sekiya, Al Ozonoff, Osamu Sakai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Mandibular fractures are frequently encountered in the trauma setting and comprise a significant number of facial injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and injury patterns of unifocal and multifocal mandibular fractures using thin-section imaging. Following IRB approval, 220 patients with mandibular fractures identified on maxillofacial CT scans performed between October 2008 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Examinations were performed on 64-multidetector row CT scanners with axial images acquired at 1.25-mm slice thickness. The location and number of fractures as well as causative mechanisms were recorded. Fractures were unifocal in 108/220 (49 %) and multifocal in 112/220 (51 %) patients. The mandibular angle was the most common fracture site in both unifocal and multifocal mandible fractures. In cases with multifocal mandibular fractures, bilateral fractures were more common (83 %) than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures (17 %). Fractures involving the parasymphysis, the mandibular body, or ramus were significantly associated with the presence of additional mandibular fractures (p <0.0001). While multifocal and unifocal fractures occurred in near equal frequency, bilateral multifocal fractures were much more common than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures. Alveolar ridge fractures were exclusively seen in unifocal mandibular fractures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalEmergency Radiology
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mandibular Injuries
Mandibular Fractures
Facial Injuries
Alveolar Process
Research Ethics Committees
Wounds and Injuries
Mandible

Keywords

  • CT
  • Fracture
  • Mandible

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Buch, K., Mottalib, A., Nadgir, R. N., Fujita, A., Sekiya, K., Ozonoff, A., & Sakai, O. (2016). Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location. Emergency Radiology, 23(2), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1375-9

Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location. / Buch, Karen; Mottalib, Adham; Nadgir, Rohini Narahari; Fujita, Akifumi; Sekiya, Kotaro; Ozonoff, Al; Sakai, Osamu.

In: Emergency Radiology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buch, K, Mottalib, A, Nadgir, RN, Fujita, A, Sekiya, K, Ozonoff, A & Sakai, O 2016, 'Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location', Emergency Radiology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1375-9
Buch, Karen ; Mottalib, Adham ; Nadgir, Rohini Narahari ; Fujita, Akifumi ; Sekiya, Kotaro ; Ozonoff, Al ; Sakai, Osamu. / Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location. In: Emergency Radiology. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 161-167.
@article{c410929f6b5848ffbf689d2c7677793e,
title = "Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location",
abstract = "Mandibular fractures are frequently encountered in the trauma setting and comprise a significant number of facial injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and injury patterns of unifocal and multifocal mandibular fractures using thin-section imaging. Following IRB approval, 220 patients with mandibular fractures identified on maxillofacial CT scans performed between October 2008 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Examinations were performed on 64-multidetector row CT scanners with axial images acquired at 1.25-mm slice thickness. The location and number of fractures as well as causative mechanisms were recorded. Fractures were unifocal in 108/220 (49 {\%}) and multifocal in 112/220 (51 {\%}) patients. The mandibular angle was the most common fracture site in both unifocal and multifocal mandible fractures. In cases with multifocal mandibular fractures, bilateral fractures were more common (83 {\%}) than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures (17 {\%}). Fractures involving the parasymphysis, the mandibular body, or ramus were significantly associated with the presence of additional mandibular fractures (p <0.0001). While multifocal and unifocal fractures occurred in near equal frequency, bilateral multifocal fractures were much more common than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures. Alveolar ridge fractures were exclusively seen in unifocal mandibular fractures.",
keywords = "CT, Fracture, Mandible",
author = "Karen Buch and Adham Mottalib and Nadgir, {Rohini Narahari} and Akifumi Fujita and Kotaro Sekiya and Al Ozonoff and Osamu Sakai",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10140-015-1375-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "161--167",
journal = "Emergency Radiology",
issn = "1070-3004",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location

AU - Buch, Karen

AU - Mottalib, Adham

AU - Nadgir, Rohini Narahari

AU - Fujita, Akifumi

AU - Sekiya, Kotaro

AU - Ozonoff, Al

AU - Sakai, Osamu

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Mandibular fractures are frequently encountered in the trauma setting and comprise a significant number of facial injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and injury patterns of unifocal and multifocal mandibular fractures using thin-section imaging. Following IRB approval, 220 patients with mandibular fractures identified on maxillofacial CT scans performed between October 2008 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Examinations were performed on 64-multidetector row CT scanners with axial images acquired at 1.25-mm slice thickness. The location and number of fractures as well as causative mechanisms were recorded. Fractures were unifocal in 108/220 (49 %) and multifocal in 112/220 (51 %) patients. The mandibular angle was the most common fracture site in both unifocal and multifocal mandible fractures. In cases with multifocal mandibular fractures, bilateral fractures were more common (83 %) than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures (17 %). Fractures involving the parasymphysis, the mandibular body, or ramus were significantly associated with the presence of additional mandibular fractures (p <0.0001). While multifocal and unifocal fractures occurred in near equal frequency, bilateral multifocal fractures were much more common than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures. Alveolar ridge fractures were exclusively seen in unifocal mandibular fractures.

AB - Mandibular fractures are frequently encountered in the trauma setting and comprise a significant number of facial injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and injury patterns of unifocal and multifocal mandibular fractures using thin-section imaging. Following IRB approval, 220 patients with mandibular fractures identified on maxillofacial CT scans performed between October 2008 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Examinations were performed on 64-multidetector row CT scanners with axial images acquired at 1.25-mm slice thickness. The location and number of fractures as well as causative mechanisms were recorded. Fractures were unifocal in 108/220 (49 %) and multifocal in 112/220 (51 %) patients. The mandibular angle was the most common fracture site in both unifocal and multifocal mandible fractures. In cases with multifocal mandibular fractures, bilateral fractures were more common (83 %) than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures (17 %). Fractures involving the parasymphysis, the mandibular body, or ramus were significantly associated with the presence of additional mandibular fractures (p <0.0001). While multifocal and unifocal fractures occurred in near equal frequency, bilateral multifocal fractures were much more common than unilateral multifocal mandibular fractures. Alveolar ridge fractures were exclusively seen in unifocal mandibular fractures.

KW - CT

KW - Fracture

KW - Mandible

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955287104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955287104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10140-015-1375-9

DO - 10.1007/s10140-015-1375-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 26797024

AN - SCOPUS:84955287104

VL - 23

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Emergency Radiology

JF - Emergency Radiology

SN - 1070-3004

IS - 2

ER -