Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: Moving from what is the matter to what matters

Elizabeth A. Bayliss, Denise E. Bonds, Cynthia Boyd, Melinda M. Davis, Bruce Finke, Michael H. Fox, Russell E. Glasgow, Richard A. Goodman, Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts, Sue Lachenmayr, Cristin Lind, Elizabeth A. Madigan, David S. Meyers, Suzanne Mintz, Wendy J. Nilsen, Sally Okun, Sarah Ruiz, Marcel E. Salive, Kurt C. Stange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: An isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Methods: Forty-five experts, including persons with MCC, family and friend caregivers, researchers, policy makers, funders, and clinicians met to critically consider 4 aspects of incorporating context into research on MCC: key contextual factors, needed research, essential research methods for understanding important contextual factors, and necessary partnerships for catalyzing collaborative action in conducting and applying research. Results: Key contextual factors involve complementary perspectives across multiple levels: public policy, community, health care systems, family, and person, as well as the cellular and molecular levels where most research currently is focused. Needed research involves moving from a disease focus toward a person-driven, goal-directed research agenda. Relevant research methods are participatory, flexible, multilevel, quantitative and qualitative, conducive to longitudinal dynamic measurement from diverse data sources, sufficiently detailed to consider what works for whom in which situation, and generative of ongoing communities of learning, living and practice. Important partnerships for collaborative action include cooperation among members of the research enterprise, health care providers, community-based support, persons with MCC and their family and friend caregivers, policy makers, and payers, including government, public health, philanthropic organizations, and the business community. Conclusion: Consistent attention to contextual factors is needed to enhance health research for persons with MCC. Rigorous, integrated, participatory, multimethod approaches to generate new knowledge and diverse partnerships can be used to increase the relevance of research to make health care more sustainable, safe, equitable and effective, to reduce suffering, and to improve quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-269
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Administrative Personnel
Caregivers
Multiple Chronic Conditions
Community Health Planning
Delivery of Health Care
Community Health Services
Information Storage and Retrieval
Public Policy
Psychological Stress
Health Personnel
Public Health
Quality of Life
Research Personnel
Learning
Organizations

Keywords

  • Chronic illness
  • Health services research
  • Multiple chronic conditions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions : Moving from what is the matter to what matters. / Bayliss, Elizabeth A.; Bonds, Denise E.; Boyd, Cynthia; Davis, Melinda M.; Finke, Bruce; Fox, Michael H.; Glasgow, Russell E.; Goodman, Richard A.; Heurtin-Roberts, Suzanne; Lachenmayr, Sue; Lind, Cristin; Madigan, Elizabeth A.; Meyers, David S.; Mintz, Suzanne; Nilsen, Wendy J.; Okun, Sally; Ruiz, Sarah; Salive, Marcel E.; Stange, Kurt C.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2014, p. 260-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bayliss, EA, Bonds, DE, Boyd, C, Davis, MM, Finke, B, Fox, MH, Glasgow, RE, Goodman, RA, Heurtin-Roberts, S, Lachenmayr, S, Lind, C, Madigan, EA, Meyers, DS, Mintz, S, Nilsen, WJ, Okun, S, Ruiz, S, Salive, ME & Stange, KC 2014, 'Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: Moving from what is the matter to what matters', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1643
Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ; Bonds, Denise E. ; Boyd, Cynthia ; Davis, Melinda M. ; Finke, Bruce ; Fox, Michael H. ; Glasgow, Russell E. ; Goodman, Richard A. ; Heurtin-Roberts, Suzanne ; Lachenmayr, Sue ; Lind, Cristin ; Madigan, Elizabeth A. ; Meyers, David S. ; Mintz, Suzanne ; Nilsen, Wendy J. ; Okun, Sally ; Ruiz, Sarah ; Salive, Marcel E. ; Stange, Kurt C. / Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions : Moving from what is the matter to what matters. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 260-269.
@article{6ef514608d764f45bc7c4bf78e0204bd,
title = "Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: Moving from what is the matter to what matters",
abstract = "Purpose: An isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Methods: Forty-five experts, including persons with MCC, family and friend caregivers, researchers, policy makers, funders, and clinicians met to critically consider 4 aspects of incorporating context into research on MCC: key contextual factors, needed research, essential research methods for understanding important contextual factors, and necessary partnerships for catalyzing collaborative action in conducting and applying research. Results: Key contextual factors involve complementary perspectives across multiple levels: public policy, community, health care systems, family, and person, as well as the cellular and molecular levels where most research currently is focused. Needed research involves moving from a disease focus toward a person-driven, goal-directed research agenda. Relevant research methods are participatory, flexible, multilevel, quantitative and qualitative, conducive to longitudinal dynamic measurement from diverse data sources, sufficiently detailed to consider what works for whom in which situation, and generative of ongoing communities of learning, living and practice. Important partnerships for collaborative action include cooperation among members of the research enterprise, health care providers, community-based support, persons with MCC and their family and friend caregivers, policy makers, and payers, including government, public health, philanthropic organizations, and the business community. Conclusion: Consistent attention to contextual factors is needed to enhance health research for persons with MCC. Rigorous, integrated, participatory, multimethod approaches to generate new knowledge and diverse partnerships can be used to increase the relevance of research to make health care more sustainable, safe, equitable and effective, to reduce suffering, and to improve quality of life.",
keywords = "Chronic illness, Health services research, Multiple chronic conditions",
author = "Bayliss, {Elizabeth A.} and Bonds, {Denise E.} and Cynthia Boyd and Davis, {Melinda M.} and Bruce Finke and Fox, {Michael H.} and Glasgow, {Russell E.} and Goodman, {Richard A.} and Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts and Sue Lachenmayr and Cristin Lind and Madigan, {Elizabeth A.} and Meyers, {David S.} and Suzanne Mintz and Nilsen, {Wendy J.} and Sally Okun and Sarah Ruiz and Salive, {Marcel E.} and Stange, {Kurt C.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1370/afm.1643",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "260--269",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions

T2 - Moving from what is the matter to what matters

AU - Bayliss, Elizabeth A.

AU - Bonds, Denise E.

AU - Boyd, Cynthia

AU - Davis, Melinda M.

AU - Finke, Bruce

AU - Fox, Michael H.

AU - Glasgow, Russell E.

AU - Goodman, Richard A.

AU - Heurtin-Roberts, Suzanne

AU - Lachenmayr, Sue

AU - Lind, Cristin

AU - Madigan, Elizabeth A.

AU - Meyers, David S.

AU - Mintz, Suzanne

AU - Nilsen, Wendy J.

AU - Okun, Sally

AU - Ruiz, Sarah

AU - Salive, Marcel E.

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: An isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Methods: Forty-five experts, including persons with MCC, family and friend caregivers, researchers, policy makers, funders, and clinicians met to critically consider 4 aspects of incorporating context into research on MCC: key contextual factors, needed research, essential research methods for understanding important contextual factors, and necessary partnerships for catalyzing collaborative action in conducting and applying research. Results: Key contextual factors involve complementary perspectives across multiple levels: public policy, community, health care systems, family, and person, as well as the cellular and molecular levels where most research currently is focused. Needed research involves moving from a disease focus toward a person-driven, goal-directed research agenda. Relevant research methods are participatory, flexible, multilevel, quantitative and qualitative, conducive to longitudinal dynamic measurement from diverse data sources, sufficiently detailed to consider what works for whom in which situation, and generative of ongoing communities of learning, living and practice. Important partnerships for collaborative action include cooperation among members of the research enterprise, health care providers, community-based support, persons with MCC and their family and friend caregivers, policy makers, and payers, including government, public health, philanthropic organizations, and the business community. Conclusion: Consistent attention to contextual factors is needed to enhance health research for persons with MCC. Rigorous, integrated, participatory, multimethod approaches to generate new knowledge and diverse partnerships can be used to increase the relevance of research to make health care more sustainable, safe, equitable and effective, to reduce suffering, and to improve quality of life.

AB - Purpose: An isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Methods: Forty-five experts, including persons with MCC, family and friend caregivers, researchers, policy makers, funders, and clinicians met to critically consider 4 aspects of incorporating context into research on MCC: key contextual factors, needed research, essential research methods for understanding important contextual factors, and necessary partnerships for catalyzing collaborative action in conducting and applying research. Results: Key contextual factors involve complementary perspectives across multiple levels: public policy, community, health care systems, family, and person, as well as the cellular and molecular levels where most research currently is focused. Needed research involves moving from a disease focus toward a person-driven, goal-directed research agenda. Relevant research methods are participatory, flexible, multilevel, quantitative and qualitative, conducive to longitudinal dynamic measurement from diverse data sources, sufficiently detailed to consider what works for whom in which situation, and generative of ongoing communities of learning, living and practice. Important partnerships for collaborative action include cooperation among members of the research enterprise, health care providers, community-based support, persons with MCC and their family and friend caregivers, policy makers, and payers, including government, public health, philanthropic organizations, and the business community. Conclusion: Consistent attention to contextual factors is needed to enhance health research for persons with MCC. Rigorous, integrated, participatory, multimethod approaches to generate new knowledge and diverse partnerships can be used to increase the relevance of research to make health care more sustainable, safe, equitable and effective, to reduce suffering, and to improve quality of life.

KW - Chronic illness

KW - Health services research

KW - Multiple chronic conditions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900428210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900428210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.1643

DO - 10.1370/afm.1643

M3 - Article

C2 - 24821898

AN - SCOPUS:84900428210

VL - 12

SP - 260

EP - 269

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 3

ER -