Understanding periviable birth: A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative

Ralph Catalano, Tim Bruckner, Lyndsay A. Avalos, Holly Stewart, Deborah Karasek, Shachar Kariv, Alison Gemmill, Katherine Saxton, Joan Casey

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Periviable infants (i.e., those born in the 20th through 26th weeks of gestation) suffer much morbidity and approximately half die in the first year of life. Attempts to explain and predict these births disproportionately invoke a “dysregulation” narrative. Research inspired by this narrative has not led to efficacious interventions. The clinical community has, therefore, urged novel approaches to the problem. We aim to provoke debate by offering the theory, inferred from microeconomics, that risk tolerant women carry, without cognitive involvement, high risk fetuses farther into pregnancy than do other women. These extended high-risk pregnancies historically ended in stillbirth but modern obstetric practices now convert a fraction to periviable births. We argue that this theory deserves testing because it suggests inexpensive and noninvasive screening for pregnancies that might benefit from the costly and invasive interventions clinical research will likely devise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-284
Number of pages4
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume233
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

microeconomics
pregnancy
Parturition
narrative
Pregnancy
High-Risk Pregnancy
Stillbirth
obstetrics
Research
morbidity
Obstetrics
infant
Fetus
Morbidity
community

Keywords

  • Periviable birth
  • Reproductive suppression
  • Risk tolerance
  • Spontaneous abortion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Catalano, R., Bruckner, T., Avalos, L. A., Stewart, H., Karasek, D., Kariv, S., ... Casey, J. (2019). Understanding periviable birth: A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative. Social Science and Medicine, 233, 281-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.014

Understanding periviable birth : A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative. / Catalano, Ralph; Bruckner, Tim; Avalos, Lyndsay A.; Stewart, Holly; Karasek, Deborah; Kariv, Shachar; Gemmill, Alison; Saxton, Katherine; Casey, Joan.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 233, 01.07.2019, p. 281-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Catalano, R, Bruckner, T, Avalos, LA, Stewart, H, Karasek, D, Kariv, S, Gemmill, A, Saxton, K & Casey, J 2019, 'Understanding periviable birth: A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative', Social Science and Medicine, vol. 233, pp. 281-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.014
Catalano, Ralph ; Bruckner, Tim ; Avalos, Lyndsay A. ; Stewart, Holly ; Karasek, Deborah ; Kariv, Shachar ; Gemmill, Alison ; Saxton, Katherine ; Casey, Joan. / Understanding periviable birth : A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 233. pp. 281-284.
@article{f82c1f816ff04ba0a6d911166437c051,
title = "Understanding periviable birth: A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative",
abstract = "Periviable infants (i.e., those born in the 20th through 26th weeks of gestation) suffer much morbidity and approximately half die in the first year of life. Attempts to explain and predict these births disproportionately invoke a “dysregulation” narrative. Research inspired by this narrative has not led to efficacious interventions. The clinical community has, therefore, urged novel approaches to the problem. We aim to provoke debate by offering the theory, inferred from microeconomics, that risk tolerant women carry, without cognitive involvement, high risk fetuses farther into pregnancy than do other women. These extended high-risk pregnancies historically ended in stillbirth but modern obstetric practices now convert a fraction to periviable births. We argue that this theory deserves testing because it suggests inexpensive and noninvasive screening for pregnancies that might benefit from the costly and invasive interventions clinical research will likely devise.",
keywords = "Periviable birth, Reproductive suppression, Risk tolerance, Spontaneous abortion",
author = "Ralph Catalano and Tim Bruckner and Avalos, {Lyndsay A.} and Holly Stewart and Deborah Karasek and Shachar Kariv and Alison Gemmill and Katherine Saxton and Joan Casey",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "233",
pages = "281--284",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding periviable birth

T2 - A microeconomic alternative to the dysregulation narrative

AU - Catalano, Ralph

AU - Bruckner, Tim

AU - Avalos, Lyndsay A.

AU - Stewart, Holly

AU - Karasek, Deborah

AU - Kariv, Shachar

AU - Gemmill, Alison

AU - Saxton, Katherine

AU - Casey, Joan

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Periviable infants (i.e., those born in the 20th through 26th weeks of gestation) suffer much morbidity and approximately half die in the first year of life. Attempts to explain and predict these births disproportionately invoke a “dysregulation” narrative. Research inspired by this narrative has not led to efficacious interventions. The clinical community has, therefore, urged novel approaches to the problem. We aim to provoke debate by offering the theory, inferred from microeconomics, that risk tolerant women carry, without cognitive involvement, high risk fetuses farther into pregnancy than do other women. These extended high-risk pregnancies historically ended in stillbirth but modern obstetric practices now convert a fraction to periviable births. We argue that this theory deserves testing because it suggests inexpensive and noninvasive screening for pregnancies that might benefit from the costly and invasive interventions clinical research will likely devise.

AB - Periviable infants (i.e., those born in the 20th through 26th weeks of gestation) suffer much morbidity and approximately half die in the first year of life. Attempts to explain and predict these births disproportionately invoke a “dysregulation” narrative. Research inspired by this narrative has not led to efficacious interventions. The clinical community has, therefore, urged novel approaches to the problem. We aim to provoke debate by offering the theory, inferred from microeconomics, that risk tolerant women carry, without cognitive involvement, high risk fetuses farther into pregnancy than do other women. These extended high-risk pregnancies historically ended in stillbirth but modern obstetric practices now convert a fraction to periviable births. We argue that this theory deserves testing because it suggests inexpensive and noninvasive screening for pregnancies that might benefit from the costly and invasive interventions clinical research will likely devise.

KW - Periviable birth

KW - Reproductive suppression

KW - Risk tolerance

KW - Spontaneous abortion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059047968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059047968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.014

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 29274689

AN - SCOPUS:85059047968

VL - 233

SP - 281

EP - 284

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -