Ultrasound guided in-plane penile nerve block for circumcision: A new, modified technique suggests lower anesthetic volume and narcotic use

M-Irfan Suleman, Anita N. Akbar Ali, Valbona Kanarek, Ming Li, Ashay Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric males. Anesthesia is often the classic dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB), which is based on landmark identification and tactile feel of tissue resistance during needle advancement. However, this technique is associated with technical failures and vascular complications. Objective: We used an ultrasound-guided in-plane technique to avoid injury of penile vascular and neural tissues during DPNB. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the success rate and efficacy of these two penile block techniques. Methods: Male pediatric patients undergoing circumcision received general anesthesia before the penis and surrounding area were prepared with 0.5% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol. Sixteen patients underwent classic DPNB, and 16 underwent the modified ultrasound-guided inplane technique. The ultrasound machine was adjusted to the musculoskeletal setting, and a linear ultrasound probe with a frequency range of 5 to 10 MHz was placed transversely along the base of the penis, which received gentle traction. Results: Though not statistically significant, patients who underwent the classic DPNB were approximately 1.8 times more likely to require rescue analgesia and approximately 2 times more likely to have a complication than those in the ultrasound-guided group. Results also showed lower volume requirements for local anesthetic and intraoperative narcotics, longer time until rescue analgesic, and lower incidence of vomiting in the ultrasound-guided group than in the landmark-guided group. Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided DPNB technique appears to offer advantages over classic DPNB and warrants a prospective controlled trial to confirm these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-653
Number of pages7
JournalMiddle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Volume23
Issue number6
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pudendal Nerve
Nerve Block
Narcotics
Anesthetics
Penis
Pediatrics
Chlorhexidine
Vascular System Injuries
Touch
Traction
Local Anesthetics
Analgesia
General Anesthesia
Needles
Vomiting
Blood Vessels
Analgesics
Anesthesia
Retrospective Studies
Alcohols

Keywords

  • Anesthesia
  • Circumcision
  • In-plane
  • Nerve block
  • Pain
  • Pediatric
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Ultrasound guided in-plane penile nerve block for circumcision : A new, modified technique suggests lower anesthetic volume and narcotic use. / Suleman, M-Irfan; Akbar Ali, Anita N.; Kanarek, Valbona; Li, Ming; Patel, Ashay.

In: Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.10.2016, p. 647-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{311a88f7313347ee82f86065862c29ec,
title = "Ultrasound guided in-plane penile nerve block for circumcision: A new, modified technique suggests lower anesthetic volume and narcotic use",
abstract = "Context: Circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric males. Anesthesia is often the classic dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB), which is based on landmark identification and tactile feel of tissue resistance during needle advancement. However, this technique is associated with technical failures and vascular complications. Objective: We used an ultrasound-guided in-plane technique to avoid injury of penile vascular and neural tissues during DPNB. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the success rate and efficacy of these two penile block techniques. Methods: Male pediatric patients undergoing circumcision received general anesthesia before the penis and surrounding area were prepared with 0.5{\%} chlorhexidine in 70{\%} alcohol. Sixteen patients underwent classic DPNB, and 16 underwent the modified ultrasound-guided inplane technique. The ultrasound machine was adjusted to the musculoskeletal setting, and a linear ultrasound probe with a frequency range of 5 to 10 MHz was placed transversely along the base of the penis, which received gentle traction. Results: Though not statistically significant, patients who underwent the classic DPNB were approximately 1.8 times more likely to require rescue analgesia and approximately 2 times more likely to have a complication than those in the ultrasound-guided group. Results also showed lower volume requirements for local anesthetic and intraoperative narcotics, longer time until rescue analgesic, and lower incidence of vomiting in the ultrasound-guided group than in the landmark-guided group. Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided DPNB technique appears to offer advantages over classic DPNB and warrants a prospective controlled trial to confirm these findings.",
keywords = "Anesthesia, Circumcision, In-plane, Nerve block, Pain, Pediatric, Ultrasound",
author = "M-Irfan Suleman and {Akbar Ali}, {Anita N.} and Valbona Kanarek and Ming Li and Ashay Patel",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "647--653",
journal = "Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology",
issn = "0544-0440",
publisher = "American University of Beirut",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound guided in-plane penile nerve block for circumcision

T2 - A new, modified technique suggests lower anesthetic volume and narcotic use

AU - Suleman, M-Irfan

AU - Akbar Ali, Anita N.

AU - Kanarek, Valbona

AU - Li, Ming

AU - Patel, Ashay

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Context: Circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric males. Anesthesia is often the classic dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB), which is based on landmark identification and tactile feel of tissue resistance during needle advancement. However, this technique is associated with technical failures and vascular complications. Objective: We used an ultrasound-guided in-plane technique to avoid injury of penile vascular and neural tissues during DPNB. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the success rate and efficacy of these two penile block techniques. Methods: Male pediatric patients undergoing circumcision received general anesthesia before the penis and surrounding area were prepared with 0.5% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol. Sixteen patients underwent classic DPNB, and 16 underwent the modified ultrasound-guided inplane technique. The ultrasound machine was adjusted to the musculoskeletal setting, and a linear ultrasound probe with a frequency range of 5 to 10 MHz was placed transversely along the base of the penis, which received gentle traction. Results: Though not statistically significant, patients who underwent the classic DPNB were approximately 1.8 times more likely to require rescue analgesia and approximately 2 times more likely to have a complication than those in the ultrasound-guided group. Results also showed lower volume requirements for local anesthetic and intraoperative narcotics, longer time until rescue analgesic, and lower incidence of vomiting in the ultrasound-guided group than in the landmark-guided group. Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided DPNB technique appears to offer advantages over classic DPNB and warrants a prospective controlled trial to confirm these findings.

AB - Context: Circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric males. Anesthesia is often the classic dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB), which is based on landmark identification and tactile feel of tissue resistance during needle advancement. However, this technique is associated with technical failures and vascular complications. Objective: We used an ultrasound-guided in-plane technique to avoid injury of penile vascular and neural tissues during DPNB. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the success rate and efficacy of these two penile block techniques. Methods: Male pediatric patients undergoing circumcision received general anesthesia before the penis and surrounding area were prepared with 0.5% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol. Sixteen patients underwent classic DPNB, and 16 underwent the modified ultrasound-guided inplane technique. The ultrasound machine was adjusted to the musculoskeletal setting, and a linear ultrasound probe with a frequency range of 5 to 10 MHz was placed transversely along the base of the penis, which received gentle traction. Results: Though not statistically significant, patients who underwent the classic DPNB were approximately 1.8 times more likely to require rescue analgesia and approximately 2 times more likely to have a complication than those in the ultrasound-guided group. Results also showed lower volume requirements for local anesthetic and intraoperative narcotics, longer time until rescue analgesic, and lower incidence of vomiting in the ultrasound-guided group than in the landmark-guided group. Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided DPNB technique appears to offer advantages over classic DPNB and warrants a prospective controlled trial to confirm these findings.

KW - Anesthesia

KW - Circumcision

KW - In-plane

KW - Nerve block

KW - Pain

KW - Pediatric

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993970526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993970526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 29939703

AN - SCOPUS:84993970526

VL - 23

SP - 647

EP - 653

JO - Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

JF - Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

SN - 0544-0440

IS - 6

ER -