Ultraschallausbildung am ultraschallsimulator

Hohe akzeptanz durch kursteilnehmer aller ultraschall-qualifikationsniveaus

Translated title of the contribution: Ultrasound education by simulator training: High acceptance by ultrasound trainees of all qualification levels

C. Terkamp, B. Walter, T. Benter, B. Hoffmann, G. Kirchner, A. Dettmer, M. Caselitz, S. Wagner, H. Reindell, J. Simanowski, M. Manns, M. Gebel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ultrasound education improves by simulator training, however, the acceptance of ultrasound simulator training has not been investigated. Therefore we evaluated the participants response to simulator education during an ultrasound course of abdominal emergencies at an international ultrasound congress, at a regular ultrasound course and during courses at a regional hospital and an university hospital. Altogether, 62.3% of the participants judged the simulator image quality to be good. 84.3% considered the case selection to be good and 92.7% of the participants viewed the educational benefit to be good. 98.5% whished to have further ultrasound simulator courses to be developed and 95.3% of the participants opted for the integration of simulator training into the conventional ultrasound education.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)809-813
Number of pages5
JournalPraxis
Volume95
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - May 17 2006

Fingerprint

Education
Emergencies

Keywords

  • Education
  • Simulator
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Terkamp, C., Walter, B., Benter, T., Hoffmann, B., Kirchner, G., Dettmer, A., ... Gebel, M. (2006). Ultraschallausbildung am ultraschallsimulator: Hohe akzeptanz durch kursteilnehmer aller ultraschall-qualifikationsniveaus. Praxis, 95(20), 809-813. https://doi.org/10.1024/0369-8394.95.20.809

Ultraschallausbildung am ultraschallsimulator : Hohe akzeptanz durch kursteilnehmer aller ultraschall-qualifikationsniveaus. / Terkamp, C.; Walter, B.; Benter, T.; Hoffmann, B.; Kirchner, G.; Dettmer, A.; Caselitz, M.; Wagner, S.; Reindell, H.; Simanowski, J.; Manns, M.; Gebel, M.

In: Praxis, Vol. 95, No. 20, 17.05.2006, p. 809-813.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Terkamp, C, Walter, B, Benter, T, Hoffmann, B, Kirchner, G, Dettmer, A, Caselitz, M, Wagner, S, Reindell, H, Simanowski, J, Manns, M & Gebel, M 2006, 'Ultraschallausbildung am ultraschallsimulator: Hohe akzeptanz durch kursteilnehmer aller ultraschall-qualifikationsniveaus', Praxis, vol. 95, no. 20, pp. 809-813. https://doi.org/10.1024/0369-8394.95.20.809
Terkamp, C. ; Walter, B. ; Benter, T. ; Hoffmann, B. ; Kirchner, G. ; Dettmer, A. ; Caselitz, M. ; Wagner, S. ; Reindell, H. ; Simanowski, J. ; Manns, M. ; Gebel, M. / Ultraschallausbildung am ultraschallsimulator : Hohe akzeptanz durch kursteilnehmer aller ultraschall-qualifikationsniveaus. In: Praxis. 2006 ; Vol. 95, No. 20. pp. 809-813.
@article{ce1684d31eb945f2832aa8791ad37ccf,
title = "Ultraschallausbildung am ultraschallsimulator: Hohe akzeptanz durch kursteilnehmer aller ultraschall-qualifikationsniveaus",
abstract = "Ultrasound education improves by simulator training, however, the acceptance of ultrasound simulator training has not been investigated. Therefore we evaluated the participants response to simulator education during an ultrasound course of abdominal emergencies at an international ultrasound congress, at a regular ultrasound course and during courses at a regional hospital and an university hospital. Altogether, 62.3{\%} of the participants judged the simulator image quality to be good. 84.3{\%} considered the case selection to be good and 92.7{\%} of the participants viewed the educational benefit to be good. 98.5{\%} whished to have further ultrasound simulator courses to be developed and 95.3{\%} of the participants opted for the integration of simulator training into the conventional ultrasound education.",
keywords = "Education, Simulator, Ultrasound",
author = "C. Terkamp and B. Walter and T. Benter and B. Hoffmann and G. Kirchner and A. Dettmer and M. Caselitz and S. Wagner and H. Reindell and J. Simanowski and M. Manns and M. Gebel",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1024/0369-8394.95.20.809",
language = "German",
volume = "95",
pages = "809--813",
journal = "Praxis",
issn = "1661-8157",
publisher = "Verlag Hans Huber",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultraschallausbildung am ultraschallsimulator

T2 - Hohe akzeptanz durch kursteilnehmer aller ultraschall-qualifikationsniveaus

AU - Terkamp, C.

AU - Walter, B.

AU - Benter, T.

AU - Hoffmann, B.

AU - Kirchner, G.

AU - Dettmer, A.

AU - Caselitz, M.

AU - Wagner, S.

AU - Reindell, H.

AU - Simanowski, J.

AU - Manns, M.

AU - Gebel, M.

PY - 2006/5/17

Y1 - 2006/5/17

N2 - Ultrasound education improves by simulator training, however, the acceptance of ultrasound simulator training has not been investigated. Therefore we evaluated the participants response to simulator education during an ultrasound course of abdominal emergencies at an international ultrasound congress, at a regular ultrasound course and during courses at a regional hospital and an university hospital. Altogether, 62.3% of the participants judged the simulator image quality to be good. 84.3% considered the case selection to be good and 92.7% of the participants viewed the educational benefit to be good. 98.5% whished to have further ultrasound simulator courses to be developed and 95.3% of the participants opted for the integration of simulator training into the conventional ultrasound education.

AB - Ultrasound education improves by simulator training, however, the acceptance of ultrasound simulator training has not been investigated. Therefore we evaluated the participants response to simulator education during an ultrasound course of abdominal emergencies at an international ultrasound congress, at a regular ultrasound course and during courses at a regional hospital and an university hospital. Altogether, 62.3% of the participants judged the simulator image quality to be good. 84.3% considered the case selection to be good and 92.7% of the participants viewed the educational benefit to be good. 98.5% whished to have further ultrasound simulator courses to be developed and 95.3% of the participants opted for the integration of simulator training into the conventional ultrasound education.

KW - Education

KW - Simulator

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745713852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745713852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1024/0369-8394.95.20.809

DO - 10.1024/0369-8394.95.20.809

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 809

EP - 813

JO - Praxis

JF - Praxis

SN - 1661-8157

IS - 20

ER -