Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Have we made any progress?

Jennifer A. Heller, Alan Weinberg, Ray Arons, K. V. Krishnasastry, Ross T. Lyon, Jonathan S. Deitch, Andrew H. Schulick, Harry L. Bush, K. Craig Kent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past 20 years, there have been numerous advances in our ability to detect and to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). We hypothesized that these advances would lead to (1) an increase in the rate of elective repair and a decrease in the incidence of ruptured AAA (rAAA) and (2) a decrease in operative deaths for both elective AAA (eAAA) and rAAA. Methods: To test these hypotheses, we investigated the incidence and outcomes of eAAA and rAAA surgery between 1979 and 1997, using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. This data set is a randomized, stratified sample representing discharges from the nation's acute care, nonfederally funded hospitals. Codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision were used to identify our study population. Results: Over the past 19 years, there has been no change in the incidence rate of eAAA repair (range, 44.1-77.9 per 100,000). Moreover, the incidence of rAAAs presenting to the nation's hospitals has not changed (range, 6.6-16.3 per 100,000). There has been no consistent improvement over time in operative deaths associated with either eAAA or rAAA repair (average rates over the study period: eAAA, 5.6%; rAAA, 45.7%). Significant predictors of death from eAAA in patients included an age older than 80 years, African American race, congestive heart failure (CHF), and diabetes (P <.0001 for all). Significant predictors of death from rAAA in patients included age older than 70 years, African American race, female sex, renal failure, and a hospital bed size more than 500 (P <.05 for all). Conclusion: On a national level, over the past 19 years, our ability to identify and to treat patients with AAA has not improved. Advances in technology and critical care have not affected outcome. Regionalization of care, screening of high-risk populations, and endovascular repair are strategies that might allow further improvement in the outcome of patients with aneurysmal disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1091-1100
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Incidence
African Americans
Hospital Bed Capacity
Health Care Surveys
Aortic Rupture
International Classification of Diseases
Critical Care
Operative Time
Population
Renal Insufficiency
Heart Failure
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Heller, J. A., Weinberg, A., Arons, R., Krishnasastry, K. V., Lyon, R. T., Deitch, J. S., ... Kent, K. C. (2000). Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Have we made any progress? Journal of Vascular Surgery, 32(6), 1091-1100. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2000.111691

Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair : Have we made any progress? / Heller, Jennifer A.; Weinberg, Alan; Arons, Ray; Krishnasastry, K. V.; Lyon, Ross T.; Deitch, Jonathan S.; Schulick, Andrew H.; Bush, Harry L.; Kent, K. Craig.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2000, p. 1091-1100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heller, JA, Weinberg, A, Arons, R, Krishnasastry, KV, Lyon, RT, Deitch, JS, Schulick, AH, Bush, HL & Kent, KC 2000, 'Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Have we made any progress?', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1091-1100. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2000.111691
Heller JA, Weinberg A, Arons R, Krishnasastry KV, Lyon RT, Deitch JS et al. Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Have we made any progress? Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2000;32(6):1091-1100. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2000.111691
Heller, Jennifer A. ; Weinberg, Alan ; Arons, Ray ; Krishnasastry, K. V. ; Lyon, Ross T. ; Deitch, Jonathan S. ; Schulick, Andrew H. ; Bush, Harry L. ; Kent, K. Craig. / Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair : Have we made any progress?. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2000 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 1091-1100.
@article{c56e309de74b43e8864707caaa9beeb5,
title = "Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Have we made any progress?",
abstract = "Purpose: Over the past 20 years, there have been numerous advances in our ability to detect and to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). We hypothesized that these advances would lead to (1) an increase in the rate of elective repair and a decrease in the incidence of ruptured AAA (rAAA) and (2) a decrease in operative deaths for both elective AAA (eAAA) and rAAA. Methods: To test these hypotheses, we investigated the incidence and outcomes of eAAA and rAAA surgery between 1979 and 1997, using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. This data set is a randomized, stratified sample representing discharges from the nation's acute care, nonfederally funded hospitals. Codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision were used to identify our study population. Results: Over the past 19 years, there has been no change in the incidence rate of eAAA repair (range, 44.1-77.9 per 100,000). Moreover, the incidence of rAAAs presenting to the nation's hospitals has not changed (range, 6.6-16.3 per 100,000). There has been no consistent improvement over time in operative deaths associated with either eAAA or rAAA repair (average rates over the study period: eAAA, 5.6{\%}; rAAA, 45.7{\%}). Significant predictors of death from eAAA in patients included an age older than 80 years, African American race, congestive heart failure (CHF), and diabetes (P <.0001 for all). Significant predictors of death from rAAA in patients included age older than 70 years, African American race, female sex, renal failure, and a hospital bed size more than 500 (P <.05 for all). Conclusion: On a national level, over the past 19 years, our ability to identify and to treat patients with AAA has not improved. Advances in technology and critical care have not affected outcome. Regionalization of care, screening of high-risk populations, and endovascular repair are strategies that might allow further improvement in the outcome of patients with aneurysmal disease.",
author = "Heller, {Jennifer A.} and Alan Weinberg and Ray Arons and Krishnasastry, {K. V.} and Lyon, {Ross T.} and Deitch, {Jonathan S.} and Schulick, {Andrew H.} and Bush, {Harry L.} and Kent, {K. Craig}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1067/mva.2000.111691",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1091--1100",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two decades of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

T2 - Have we made any progress?

AU - Heller, Jennifer A.

AU - Weinberg, Alan

AU - Arons, Ray

AU - Krishnasastry, K. V.

AU - Lyon, Ross T.

AU - Deitch, Jonathan S.

AU - Schulick, Andrew H.

AU - Bush, Harry L.

AU - Kent, K. Craig

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Purpose: Over the past 20 years, there have been numerous advances in our ability to detect and to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). We hypothesized that these advances would lead to (1) an increase in the rate of elective repair and a decrease in the incidence of ruptured AAA (rAAA) and (2) a decrease in operative deaths for both elective AAA (eAAA) and rAAA. Methods: To test these hypotheses, we investigated the incidence and outcomes of eAAA and rAAA surgery between 1979 and 1997, using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. This data set is a randomized, stratified sample representing discharges from the nation's acute care, nonfederally funded hospitals. Codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision were used to identify our study population. Results: Over the past 19 years, there has been no change in the incidence rate of eAAA repair (range, 44.1-77.9 per 100,000). Moreover, the incidence of rAAAs presenting to the nation's hospitals has not changed (range, 6.6-16.3 per 100,000). There has been no consistent improvement over time in operative deaths associated with either eAAA or rAAA repair (average rates over the study period: eAAA, 5.6%; rAAA, 45.7%). Significant predictors of death from eAAA in patients included an age older than 80 years, African American race, congestive heart failure (CHF), and diabetes (P <.0001 for all). Significant predictors of death from rAAA in patients included age older than 70 years, African American race, female sex, renal failure, and a hospital bed size more than 500 (P <.05 for all). Conclusion: On a national level, over the past 19 years, our ability to identify and to treat patients with AAA has not improved. Advances in technology and critical care have not affected outcome. Regionalization of care, screening of high-risk populations, and endovascular repair are strategies that might allow further improvement in the outcome of patients with aneurysmal disease.

AB - Purpose: Over the past 20 years, there have been numerous advances in our ability to detect and to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). We hypothesized that these advances would lead to (1) an increase in the rate of elective repair and a decrease in the incidence of ruptured AAA (rAAA) and (2) a decrease in operative deaths for both elective AAA (eAAA) and rAAA. Methods: To test these hypotheses, we investigated the incidence and outcomes of eAAA and rAAA surgery between 1979 and 1997, using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. This data set is a randomized, stratified sample representing discharges from the nation's acute care, nonfederally funded hospitals. Codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision were used to identify our study population. Results: Over the past 19 years, there has been no change in the incidence rate of eAAA repair (range, 44.1-77.9 per 100,000). Moreover, the incidence of rAAAs presenting to the nation's hospitals has not changed (range, 6.6-16.3 per 100,000). There has been no consistent improvement over time in operative deaths associated with either eAAA or rAAA repair (average rates over the study period: eAAA, 5.6%; rAAA, 45.7%). Significant predictors of death from eAAA in patients included an age older than 80 years, African American race, congestive heart failure (CHF), and diabetes (P <.0001 for all). Significant predictors of death from rAAA in patients included age older than 70 years, African American race, female sex, renal failure, and a hospital bed size more than 500 (P <.05 for all). Conclusion: On a national level, over the past 19 years, our ability to identify and to treat patients with AAA has not improved. Advances in technology and critical care have not affected outcome. Regionalization of care, screening of high-risk populations, and endovascular repair are strategies that might allow further improvement in the outcome of patients with aneurysmal disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033635960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033635960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mva.2000.111691

DO - 10.1067/mva.2000.111691

M3 - Article

C2 - 11107080

AN - SCOPUS:0033635960

VL - 32

SP - 1091

EP - 1100

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -