Twelve best practices for team training evaluation in health care

Sallie Weaver, Eduardo Salas, Heidi B. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Evaluation and measurement are the building blocks of effective skill development, transfer of training, maintenance and sustainment of effective team performance, and continuous improvement. Evaluation efforts have varied in their methods, time frame, measures, and design. On the basis of the existing body of work, 12 best practice principles were extrapolated from the science of evaluation and measurement into the practice of team training evaluation. Team training evaluation refers to efforts dedicated to enumerating the impact of training (1) across multiple dimensions, (2) across multiple settings, and (3) over time. Evaluations of efforts to optimize teamwork are often afterthoughts in an industry that is grounded in evidencebased practice. The best practices regarding team training evaluation are provided as practical reminders and guidance for continuing to build a balanced and robust body of evidence regarding the impact of team training in health care. The 12 Best Practices: The best practices are organized around three phases of training: planning, implementation, and follow-up. Rooted in the science of team training evaluation and performance measurement, they range from Best Practice 1: Before designing training, start backwards: think about traditional frameworks for evaluation in reverse to Best Practice 7: Consider organizational, team, or other factors that may help (or hinder) the effects of training and then to Best Practice 12: Report evaluation results in a meaningful way, both internally and externally. Conclusions: Although the 12 best practices may be perceived as intuitive, they are intended to serve as reminders that the notion of evidence-based practice applies to quality improvement initiatives such as team training and team development as equally as it does to clinical intervention and improvement efforts. Copyright 2011

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-349
Number of pages9
JournalJoint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
Volume37
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Evidence-Based Practice
Quality Improvement
Industry
Maintenance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Twelve best practices for team training evaluation in health care. / Weaver, Sallie; Salas, Eduardo; King, Heidi B.

In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Vol. 37, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 341-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weaver, Sallie ; Salas, Eduardo ; King, Heidi B. / Twelve best practices for team training evaluation in health care. In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2011 ; Vol. 37, No. 8. pp. 341-349.
@article{8f3acb5976474e9cbcc70ca27f67fd5a,
title = "Twelve best practices for team training evaluation in health care",
abstract = "Background: Evaluation and measurement are the building blocks of effective skill development, transfer of training, maintenance and sustainment of effective team performance, and continuous improvement. Evaluation efforts have varied in their methods, time frame, measures, and design. On the basis of the existing body of work, 12 best practice principles were extrapolated from the science of evaluation and measurement into the practice of team training evaluation. Team training evaluation refers to efforts dedicated to enumerating the impact of training (1) across multiple dimensions, (2) across multiple settings, and (3) over time. Evaluations of efforts to optimize teamwork are often afterthoughts in an industry that is grounded in evidencebased practice. The best practices regarding team training evaluation are provided as practical reminders and guidance for continuing to build a balanced and robust body of evidence regarding the impact of team training in health care. The 12 Best Practices: The best practices are organized around three phases of training: planning, implementation, and follow-up. Rooted in the science of team training evaluation and performance measurement, they range from Best Practice 1: Before designing training, start backwards: think about traditional frameworks for evaluation in reverse to Best Practice 7: Consider organizational, team, or other factors that may help (or hinder) the effects of training and then to Best Practice 12: Report evaluation results in a meaningful way, both internally and externally. Conclusions: Although the 12 best practices may be perceived as intuitive, they are intended to serve as reminders that the notion of evidence-based practice applies to quality improvement initiatives such as team training and team development as equally as it does to clinical intervention and improvement efforts. Copyright 2011",
author = "Sallie Weaver and Eduardo Salas and King, {Heidi B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "341--349",
journal = "Nature Clinical Practice Oncology",
issn = "1759-4774",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twelve best practices for team training evaluation in health care

AU - Weaver, Sallie

AU - Salas, Eduardo

AU - King, Heidi B.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Background: Evaluation and measurement are the building blocks of effective skill development, transfer of training, maintenance and sustainment of effective team performance, and continuous improvement. Evaluation efforts have varied in their methods, time frame, measures, and design. On the basis of the existing body of work, 12 best practice principles were extrapolated from the science of evaluation and measurement into the practice of team training evaluation. Team training evaluation refers to efforts dedicated to enumerating the impact of training (1) across multiple dimensions, (2) across multiple settings, and (3) over time. Evaluations of efforts to optimize teamwork are often afterthoughts in an industry that is grounded in evidencebased practice. The best practices regarding team training evaluation are provided as practical reminders and guidance for continuing to build a balanced and robust body of evidence regarding the impact of team training in health care. The 12 Best Practices: The best practices are organized around three phases of training: planning, implementation, and follow-up. Rooted in the science of team training evaluation and performance measurement, they range from Best Practice 1: Before designing training, start backwards: think about traditional frameworks for evaluation in reverse to Best Practice 7: Consider organizational, team, or other factors that may help (or hinder) the effects of training and then to Best Practice 12: Report evaluation results in a meaningful way, both internally and externally. Conclusions: Although the 12 best practices may be perceived as intuitive, they are intended to serve as reminders that the notion of evidence-based practice applies to quality improvement initiatives such as team training and team development as equally as it does to clinical intervention and improvement efforts. Copyright 2011

AB - Background: Evaluation and measurement are the building blocks of effective skill development, transfer of training, maintenance and sustainment of effective team performance, and continuous improvement. Evaluation efforts have varied in their methods, time frame, measures, and design. On the basis of the existing body of work, 12 best practice principles were extrapolated from the science of evaluation and measurement into the practice of team training evaluation. Team training evaluation refers to efforts dedicated to enumerating the impact of training (1) across multiple dimensions, (2) across multiple settings, and (3) over time. Evaluations of efforts to optimize teamwork are often afterthoughts in an industry that is grounded in evidencebased practice. The best practices regarding team training evaluation are provided as practical reminders and guidance for continuing to build a balanced and robust body of evidence regarding the impact of team training in health care. The 12 Best Practices: The best practices are organized around three phases of training: planning, implementation, and follow-up. Rooted in the science of team training evaluation and performance measurement, they range from Best Practice 1: Before designing training, start backwards: think about traditional frameworks for evaluation in reverse to Best Practice 7: Consider organizational, team, or other factors that may help (or hinder) the effects of training and then to Best Practice 12: Report evaluation results in a meaningful way, both internally and externally. Conclusions: Although the 12 best practices may be perceived as intuitive, they are intended to serve as reminders that the notion of evidence-based practice applies to quality improvement initiatives such as team training and team development as equally as it does to clinical intervention and improvement efforts. Copyright 2011

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053331032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053331032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21874969

AN - SCOPUS:80053331032

VL - 37

SP - 341

EP - 349

JO - Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

JF - Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

SN - 1759-4774

IS - 8

ER -