Trends in risk profiles for and mortality associated with invasive aspergillosis among liver transplant recipients

Nina Singh, Robin K. Avery, Patricia Munoz, Timothy L. Pruett, Barbara Alexander, Richard Jacobs, Jan G. Tollemar, Edward A. Dominguez, Chen M. Yu, David L. Paterson, Shahid Husain, Shimon Kusne, Peter Linden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

176 Scopus citations

Abstract

To discern whether the characteristics and outcome of invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients have evolved during the past decade, 26 patients who underwent transplantation during 1990-1995 (known as "the earlier cohort") were compared with 20 patients who underwent transplantation during 1998-2001 (known as "the later cohort"). Twenty-three percent of the Aspergillus infections in the earlier cohort occurred ≥90 days after transplantation, compared with 55% of such infections in the later cohort (P = .026). The earlier cohort was significantly more likely to have disseminated infection (P = .034) and central nervous system (CNS) involvement (P = .0004) than was the later cohort. The mortality rate was significantly higher for the earlier cohort (92%) than for the later cohort (60%; P = .012). Only disseminated infection (not the year of transplantation) approached statistical significance as an independent predictor of outcome. In the current era, invasive aspergillosis occurs later in the posttransplantation period, is less likely to be associated with CNS infection, and is associated with a lower mortality rate, compared with invasive aspergillosis in the early 1990s.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-52
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in risk profiles for and mortality associated with invasive aspergillosis among liver transplant recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this