TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in pediatricians’ developmental screening
T2 - 2002–2016
AU - Lipkin, Paul H.
AU - Macias, Michelle M.
AU - Chen, Briella Baer
AU - Coury, Daniel
AU - Gottschlich, Elizabeth A.
AU - Hyman, Susan L.
AU - Sisk, Blake
AU - Wolfe, Audrey
AU - Levy, Susan E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The 2016 survey and development of this article was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services (cooperative agreement UA3 MC11054: Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health). This information or content and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, or US Government. This work was conducted through the Autism Speaks Autism Treatment Network, serving as the Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health. The 2002 survey was supported by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs (grant H02 MC00073) and the National Center of Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs.
Funding Information:
FUNDING: Funded by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Health Resources and Services Administration (grant UA3MC11054), and the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs (grant H02 MC00073).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Current guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend screening children for developmental problems by using a standardized screening tool and referring at-risk patients to early intervention (EI) or subspecialists. Adoption of guidelines has been gradual, with research showing many children still not being screened and referred. METHODS: We analyzed American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey data from 2002 (response rate = 58%; N = 562), 2009 (response rate = 57%; N = 532), and 2016 (response rate = 47%, N = 469). Surveys included items on pediatricians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding screening and referring children for developmental problems. We used descriptive statistics and a multivariable logistic regression model to examine trends in screening and referral practices and attitudes. RESULTS: Pediatricians’ reported use of developmental screening tools increased from 21% in 2002 to 63% in 2016 (P, .001). In 2016, on average pediatricians reported referring 59% of their at-risk patients to EI, up from 41% in 2002 (P, .001), and pediatricians in 2016 were more likely than in 2002 to report being “very likely” to refer a patient with global developmental delay, milestone loss, language delay, sensory impairment, motor delays, and family concern to EI. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians’ reported use of a standardized developmental screening tool has tripled from 2002 to 2016, and more pediatricians are self-reporting making referrals for children with concerns in developmental screening. To sustain this progress, additional efforts are needed to enhance referral systems, improve EI programs, and provide better tracking of child outcomes.
AB - BACKGROUND: Current guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend screening children for developmental problems by using a standardized screening tool and referring at-risk patients to early intervention (EI) or subspecialists. Adoption of guidelines has been gradual, with research showing many children still not being screened and referred. METHODS: We analyzed American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey data from 2002 (response rate = 58%; N = 562), 2009 (response rate = 57%; N = 532), and 2016 (response rate = 47%, N = 469). Surveys included items on pediatricians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding screening and referring children for developmental problems. We used descriptive statistics and a multivariable logistic regression model to examine trends in screening and referral practices and attitudes. RESULTS: Pediatricians’ reported use of developmental screening tools increased from 21% in 2002 to 63% in 2016 (P, .001). In 2016, on average pediatricians reported referring 59% of their at-risk patients to EI, up from 41% in 2002 (P, .001), and pediatricians in 2016 were more likely than in 2002 to report being “very likely” to refer a patient with global developmental delay, milestone loss, language delay, sensory impairment, motor delays, and family concern to EI. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians’ reported use of a standardized developmental screening tool has tripled from 2002 to 2016, and more pediatricians are self-reporting making referrals for children with concerns in developmental screening. To sustain this progress, additional efforts are needed to enhance referral systems, improve EI programs, and provide better tracking of child outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082829429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082829429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1542/peds.2019-0851
DO - 10.1542/peds.2019-0851
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32123018
AN - SCOPUS:85082829429
SN - 0031-4005
VL - 145
JO - Pediatrics
JF - Pediatrics
IS - 4
M1 - e20190851
ER -