Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery

Neda Amini, Gaya Spolverato, Yuhree Kim, Timothy M. Pawlik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: We sought to evaluate trends in selection of high volume (HV) hospitals for pancreatic surgery, as well as examine trends in preoperative complications, mortality, and failure to rescue (FTR). Method: Patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Preoperative morbidity, mortality, and FTR were examined over time. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles based on the number of pancreatic resections per year for each time period. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of hospital volume on risk of complication, postoperative mortality, and FTR over time. Result: A total of 35,986 patients were identified. Median hospital volume increased from 13 in 2000–2003 to 55 procedures/year in 2008–2011 (P <0.001). Morbidity remained relatively the same over time at low volume (LV), intermediate volume (IV), and HV hospitals (all P > 0.05). Overall postoperative mortality was 5 %, and it decreased over time across all hospital volumes (P <0.05). FTR was more common at LV (12.0 %) and IV (8.5 %) volume hospitals compared with HV hospitals (6.4 %). The improvement in FTR over time was most pronounced at LV and IV hospitals versus HV hospitals (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Median hospital volume for pancreatic surgery has increased over the past decade. While the morbidity remained relatively stable over time, mortality improved especially in LV and IV hospitals. This improvement in mortality seems to be related to a decreased FTR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1581-1592
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 21 2015

Fingerprint

High-Volume Hospitals
Mortality
Logistic Models
Morbidity
Inpatients

Keywords

  • Failure to rescue
  • Hospital volume
  • Pancreas
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. / Amini, Neda; Spolverato, Gaya; Kim, Yuhree; Pawlik, Timothy M.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 9, 21.03.2015, p. 1581-1592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amini, Neda ; Spolverato, Gaya ; Kim, Yuhree ; Pawlik, Timothy M. / Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 19, No. 9. pp. 1581-1592.
@article{c79d3bca5333444f98e7dcc0b2db5f74,
title = "Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery",
abstract = "Background: We sought to evaluate trends in selection of high volume (HV) hospitals for pancreatic surgery, as well as examine trends in preoperative complications, mortality, and failure to rescue (FTR). Method: Patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Preoperative morbidity, mortality, and FTR were examined over time. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles based on the number of pancreatic resections per year for each time period. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of hospital volume on risk of complication, postoperative mortality, and FTR over time. Result: A total of 35,986 patients were identified. Median hospital volume increased from 13 in 2000–2003 to 55 procedures/year in 2008–2011 (P <0.001). Morbidity remained relatively the same over time at low volume (LV), intermediate volume (IV), and HV hospitals (all P > 0.05). Overall postoperative mortality was 5 {\%}, and it decreased over time across all hospital volumes (P <0.05). FTR was more common at LV (12.0 {\%}) and IV (8.5 {\%}) volume hospitals compared with HV hospitals (6.4 {\%}). The improvement in FTR over time was most pronounced at LV and IV hospitals versus HV hospitals (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Median hospital volume for pancreatic surgery has increased over the past decade. While the morbidity remained relatively stable over time, mortality improved especially in LV and IV hospitals. This improvement in mortality seems to be related to a decreased FTR.",
keywords = "Failure to rescue, Hospital volume, Pancreas, Surgery",
author = "Neda Amini and Gaya Spolverato and Yuhree Kim and Pawlik, {Timothy M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-015-2800-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1581--1592",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery

AU - Amini, Neda

AU - Spolverato, Gaya

AU - Kim, Yuhree

AU - Pawlik, Timothy M.

PY - 2015/3/21

Y1 - 2015/3/21

N2 - Background: We sought to evaluate trends in selection of high volume (HV) hospitals for pancreatic surgery, as well as examine trends in preoperative complications, mortality, and failure to rescue (FTR). Method: Patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Preoperative morbidity, mortality, and FTR were examined over time. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles based on the number of pancreatic resections per year for each time period. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of hospital volume on risk of complication, postoperative mortality, and FTR over time. Result: A total of 35,986 patients were identified. Median hospital volume increased from 13 in 2000–2003 to 55 procedures/year in 2008–2011 (P <0.001). Morbidity remained relatively the same over time at low volume (LV), intermediate volume (IV), and HV hospitals (all P > 0.05). Overall postoperative mortality was 5 %, and it decreased over time across all hospital volumes (P <0.05). FTR was more common at LV (12.0 %) and IV (8.5 %) volume hospitals compared with HV hospitals (6.4 %). The improvement in FTR over time was most pronounced at LV and IV hospitals versus HV hospitals (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Median hospital volume for pancreatic surgery has increased over the past decade. While the morbidity remained relatively stable over time, mortality improved especially in LV and IV hospitals. This improvement in mortality seems to be related to a decreased FTR.

AB - Background: We sought to evaluate trends in selection of high volume (HV) hospitals for pancreatic surgery, as well as examine trends in preoperative complications, mortality, and failure to rescue (FTR). Method: Patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Preoperative morbidity, mortality, and FTR were examined over time. Hospital volume was stratified into tertiles based on the number of pancreatic resections per year for each time period. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of hospital volume on risk of complication, postoperative mortality, and FTR over time. Result: A total of 35,986 patients were identified. Median hospital volume increased from 13 in 2000–2003 to 55 procedures/year in 2008–2011 (P <0.001). Morbidity remained relatively the same over time at low volume (LV), intermediate volume (IV), and HV hospitals (all P > 0.05). Overall postoperative mortality was 5 %, and it decreased over time across all hospital volumes (P <0.05). FTR was more common at LV (12.0 %) and IV (8.5 %) volume hospitals compared with HV hospitals (6.4 %). The improvement in FTR over time was most pronounced at LV and IV hospitals versus HV hospitals (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Median hospital volume for pancreatic surgery has increased over the past decade. While the morbidity remained relatively stable over time, mortality improved especially in LV and IV hospitals. This improvement in mortality seems to be related to a decreased FTR.

KW - Failure to rescue

KW - Hospital volume

KW - Pancreas

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939465520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939465520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-015-2800-9

DO - 10.1007/s11605-015-2800-9

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1581

EP - 1592

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 9

ER -