Trends and determinants of use of long-acting reversible contraception use among young women in France: Results from three national surveys conducted between 2000 and 2010

Caroline Moreau, Aline Bohet, Danielle Hassoun, Michel Teboul, Nathalie Bajos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate trends and determinants in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including intrauterine devices and implants, over the last decade among young women in France. Design: Data drawn from three cross-sectional national probability surveys. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): A total of 1,204 women, ages 15 to 29, who are at potential risk of an unintended pregnancy in 2000; 1,921 in 2005; and 1,281 in 2010. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Logistic regression models were used to explore trends in LARC use since 2000 and to examine determinants of LARC use in 2010. Result(s): A minority of women were using LARC methods, with a significant increase between 2000 and 2010, from 4.6% to 6.4%. The odds of LARC use in 2010 were higher among women 20 to 29 years, parous women, women with a history of unintended pregnancy, women in difficult financial situations, smokers, and women in the care of a gynecologist. Conclusion(s): This study shows that little progress has been made in LARC use among young women in France, despite these methods being widely available and reimbursed by the national health system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-458
Number of pages8
JournalFertility and sterility
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Keywords

  • Contraception behavior
  • France
  • IUD
  • implant
  • long-acting methods of contraception
  • population-based survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends and determinants of use of long-acting reversible contraception use among young women in France: Results from three national surveys conducted between 2000 and 2010'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this