Treatment options for chronic myeloid leukemia: Imatinib versus interferon versus allogeneic transplant

Greg R. Angstreich, B. Douglas Smith, Richard J. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review considers recent developments in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with attention to current data evaluating the relative roles of imatinib mesylate, interferon-α, and allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation. Additionally, the review discusses advances in the basic understanding of the mechanisms by which these three different therapies function against chronic myeloid leukemia. Recent findings: Long-term follow-up has found that interferon-α was able to produce complete cytogenetic remission in 15 to 25% of patients, with some of these patients achieving a molecular remission. Some patients who achieve a complete cytogenetic remission also achieve long-term disease-free survival and possibly cure. Imatinib has produced remarkable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in newly treated and in interferon-α-refractory patients, yet there are no long-term survival data at this point. Some laboratory findings imply that imatinib may primarily affect mature chronic myeloid leukemia progenitors and not chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells, leaving doubt that the improved rate of complete cytogenetic remissions will result in increased overall survival. Other clonal cytogenetic abnormalities have also been reported in the Philadelphia chromosome-negative cells present in complete cytogenetic remissions to imatinib. The use of donor lymphocytes infusion (DLI) continues to treat relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia effectively after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation whereas the use of nonmyeloablative therapy has effectively reduced transplant-related mortality. Summary: Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia now have several potential treatment options from which to choose. Imatinib mesylate currently provides excellent hematologic and cytogenetic response rates with minimal toxicity. However, long-term data of efficacy is lacking. Emerging evidence that imatinib rarely leads to molecular complete remission and that many patients are still at risk of relapse and other clonal disorders is concerning and suggest the possibility that imatinib's early high response rates may not translate into survival advantage. Interferon-α continues to be effective therapy for many patients and, along with blood or marrow transplantation, is proved to prolong survival. The impacts of both are in part limited because of their toxicity profiles. Ongoing laboratory investigations and clinical trials remain paramount to providing the best treatment approach for our patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-99
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent opinion in oncology
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2004

Keywords

  • Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation
  • Chronic myeloid leukemia
  • Imatinib mesylate
  • Interferon-α

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment options for chronic myeloid leukemia: Imatinib versus interferon versus allogeneic transplant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this