Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification

William E. Whitehead, Lynn Parker, Linda Bosmajian, E. Darcie Morrill-Corbin, Susan Middaugh, Marcia Garwood, Michael F Cataldo, John Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments compared the effects of biofeedback training to behavior modification in the treatment of 33 children aged 5 to 16 who had fecal incontinence secondary to myelomeningocele. Biofeedback involved (a) providing visual feedback and rewards for successively stronger sphincter contractions during training sessions and (b) requiring 50 sphincter contraction exercises daily. Behavior modification involved (a) attempting to defecate immediately after the evening meal each day, (b) receiving a reward for defecting in the toilet without an enema or suppository, and (c) receiving an enema if unsuccessful for two consecutive days. In experiment I, eight children were offered biofeedback alone in an attempt to replicate previous studies. Biofeedback alone was found insufficient; addition of behavior modification was necessary. Experiment II systematically investigated the relative contribution of these two treatments. Overall, patients who received only behavior modification for three months showed as much clinical improvement as patients who received behavior modification plus biofeedback. This suggests that previous reports, because they have not controlled for nonspecific treatment effects, have overestimated the value of biofeedback in this population. However, a subgroup of patients (27%) were identified for whom biofeedback provided additional, specific benefit. These were children who had spinal cord lesions below L-2 and who initially had two or more bowel movements daily. The combination of behavior modification and biofeedback resulted in a greater than 50% reduction in the frequency of incontinence for 64% of patients, and results were well maintained at follow-up one year later.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-224
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume67
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Fecal Incontinence
Spinal Dysraphism
Behavior Therapy
Enema
Therapeutics
Reward
Meningomyelocele
Suppositories
Sensory Feedback
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Meals
Spinal Cord
Exercise

Keywords

  • Behavior therapy
  • Biofeedback
  • Fecal incontinence
  • Neural tube defects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Whitehead, W. E., Parker, L., Bosmajian, L., Darcie Morrill-Corbin, E., Middaugh, S., Garwood, M., ... Freeman, J. (1986). Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67(4), 218-224.

Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida : Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification. / Whitehead, William E.; Parker, Lynn; Bosmajian, Linda; Darcie Morrill-Corbin, E.; Middaugh, Susan; Garwood, Marcia; Cataldo, Michael F; Freeman, John.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 67, No. 4, 1986, p. 218-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whitehead, WE, Parker, L, Bosmajian, L, Darcie Morrill-Corbin, E, Middaugh, S, Garwood, M, Cataldo, MF & Freeman, J 1986, 'Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification', Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 218-224.
Whitehead WE, Parker L, Bosmajian L, Darcie Morrill-Corbin E, Middaugh S, Garwood M et al. Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1986;67(4):218-224.
Whitehead, William E. ; Parker, Lynn ; Bosmajian, Linda ; Darcie Morrill-Corbin, E. ; Middaugh, Susan ; Garwood, Marcia ; Cataldo, Michael F ; Freeman, John. / Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida : Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1986 ; Vol. 67, No. 4. pp. 218-224.
@article{51ab349dc9264e5fbc987184def97f85,
title = "Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification",
abstract = "Two experiments compared the effects of biofeedback training to behavior modification in the treatment of 33 children aged 5 to 16 who had fecal incontinence secondary to myelomeningocele. Biofeedback involved (a) providing visual feedback and rewards for successively stronger sphincter contractions during training sessions and (b) requiring 50 sphincter contraction exercises daily. Behavior modification involved (a) attempting to defecate immediately after the evening meal each day, (b) receiving a reward for defecting in the toilet without an enema or suppository, and (c) receiving an enema if unsuccessful for two consecutive days. In experiment I, eight children were offered biofeedback alone in an attempt to replicate previous studies. Biofeedback alone was found insufficient; addition of behavior modification was necessary. Experiment II systematically investigated the relative contribution of these two treatments. Overall, patients who received only behavior modification for three months showed as much clinical improvement as patients who received behavior modification plus biofeedback. This suggests that previous reports, because they have not controlled for nonspecific treatment effects, have overestimated the value of biofeedback in this population. However, a subgroup of patients (27{\%}) were identified for whom biofeedback provided additional, specific benefit. These were children who had spinal cord lesions below L-2 and who initially had two or more bowel movements daily. The combination of behavior modification and biofeedback resulted in a greater than 50{\%} reduction in the frequency of incontinence for 64{\%} of patients, and results were well maintained at follow-up one year later.",
keywords = "Behavior therapy, Biofeedback, Fecal incontinence, Neural tube defects",
author = "Whitehead, {William E.} and Lynn Parker and Linda Bosmajian and {Darcie Morrill-Corbin}, E. and Susan Middaugh and Marcia Garwood and Cataldo, {Michael F} and John Freeman",
year = "1986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "218--224",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida

T2 - Comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification

AU - Whitehead, William E.

AU - Parker, Lynn

AU - Bosmajian, Linda

AU - Darcie Morrill-Corbin, E.

AU - Middaugh, Susan

AU - Garwood, Marcia

AU - Cataldo, Michael F

AU - Freeman, John

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Two experiments compared the effects of biofeedback training to behavior modification in the treatment of 33 children aged 5 to 16 who had fecal incontinence secondary to myelomeningocele. Biofeedback involved (a) providing visual feedback and rewards for successively stronger sphincter contractions during training sessions and (b) requiring 50 sphincter contraction exercises daily. Behavior modification involved (a) attempting to defecate immediately after the evening meal each day, (b) receiving a reward for defecting in the toilet without an enema or suppository, and (c) receiving an enema if unsuccessful for two consecutive days. In experiment I, eight children were offered biofeedback alone in an attempt to replicate previous studies. Biofeedback alone was found insufficient; addition of behavior modification was necessary. Experiment II systematically investigated the relative contribution of these two treatments. Overall, patients who received only behavior modification for three months showed as much clinical improvement as patients who received behavior modification plus biofeedback. This suggests that previous reports, because they have not controlled for nonspecific treatment effects, have overestimated the value of biofeedback in this population. However, a subgroup of patients (27%) were identified for whom biofeedback provided additional, specific benefit. These were children who had spinal cord lesions below L-2 and who initially had two or more bowel movements daily. The combination of behavior modification and biofeedback resulted in a greater than 50% reduction in the frequency of incontinence for 64% of patients, and results were well maintained at follow-up one year later.

AB - Two experiments compared the effects of biofeedback training to behavior modification in the treatment of 33 children aged 5 to 16 who had fecal incontinence secondary to myelomeningocele. Biofeedback involved (a) providing visual feedback and rewards for successively stronger sphincter contractions during training sessions and (b) requiring 50 sphincter contraction exercises daily. Behavior modification involved (a) attempting to defecate immediately after the evening meal each day, (b) receiving a reward for defecting in the toilet without an enema or suppository, and (c) receiving an enema if unsuccessful for two consecutive days. In experiment I, eight children were offered biofeedback alone in an attempt to replicate previous studies. Biofeedback alone was found insufficient; addition of behavior modification was necessary. Experiment II systematically investigated the relative contribution of these two treatments. Overall, patients who received only behavior modification for three months showed as much clinical improvement as patients who received behavior modification plus biofeedback. This suggests that previous reports, because they have not controlled for nonspecific treatment effects, have overestimated the value of biofeedback in this population. However, a subgroup of patients (27%) were identified for whom biofeedback provided additional, specific benefit. These were children who had spinal cord lesions below L-2 and who initially had two or more bowel movements daily. The combination of behavior modification and biofeedback resulted in a greater than 50% reduction in the frequency of incontinence for 64% of patients, and results were well maintained at follow-up one year later.

KW - Behavior therapy

KW - Biofeedback

KW - Fecal incontinence

KW - Neural tube defects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022607671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022607671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3964054

AN - SCOPUS:0022607671

VL - 67

SP - 218

EP - 224

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 4

ER -