Abstract
Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that some state trauma systems are struggling to remain solvent while others appear stable in the current health care environment. The purpose of this research is to characterize the current structure and viability of state trauma systems in the U.S. Methods: Expert panels were convened in all 50 states to characterize the current structure of trauma care and to identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing trauma care delivery in each state. Results: States continue to value the formalization of trauma systems. System operations, evaluation/research methods and trauma leadership are highly valued by states with mature systems. However, all states consider their trauma system severely threatened by inadequate funding and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians and nurses. Conclusion: Trauma care systems are valued and demonstrate potential for future expansion. However, economic shortfalls and retention of medical personnel threaten the viability of current systems across the U.S.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 136-146 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2005 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Health care
- Trauma center
- Trauma system
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
Cite this
Trauma system structure and viability in the current healthcare environment : A state-by-state assessment. / Mann, N. Clay; Mackenzie, Ellen J; Teitelbaum, Sandra D.; Wright, Dagan; Anderson, Cheryl.
In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 136-146.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Trauma system structure and viability in the current healthcare environment
T2 - A state-by-state assessment
AU - Mann, N. Clay
AU - Mackenzie, Ellen J
AU - Teitelbaum, Sandra D.
AU - Wright, Dagan
AU - Anderson, Cheryl
PY - 2005/1
Y1 - 2005/1
N2 - Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that some state trauma systems are struggling to remain solvent while others appear stable in the current health care environment. The purpose of this research is to characterize the current structure and viability of state trauma systems in the U.S. Methods: Expert panels were convened in all 50 states to characterize the current structure of trauma care and to identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing trauma care delivery in each state. Results: States continue to value the formalization of trauma systems. System operations, evaluation/research methods and trauma leadership are highly valued by states with mature systems. However, all states consider their trauma system severely threatened by inadequate funding and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians and nurses. Conclusion: Trauma care systems are valued and demonstrate potential for future expansion. However, economic shortfalls and retention of medical personnel threaten the viability of current systems across the U.S.
AB - Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that some state trauma systems are struggling to remain solvent while others appear stable in the current health care environment. The purpose of this research is to characterize the current structure and viability of state trauma systems in the U.S. Methods: Expert panels were convened in all 50 states to characterize the current structure of trauma care and to identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing trauma care delivery in each state. Results: States continue to value the formalization of trauma systems. System operations, evaluation/research methods and trauma leadership are highly valued by states with mature systems. However, all states consider their trauma system severely threatened by inadequate funding and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians and nurses. Conclusion: Trauma care systems are valued and demonstrate potential for future expansion. However, economic shortfalls and retention of medical personnel threaten the viability of current systems across the U.S.
KW - Health care
KW - Trauma center
KW - Trauma system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13544271011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13544271011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.TA.0000151181.44658.0A
DO - 10.1097/01.TA.0000151181.44658.0A
M3 - Article
VL - 58
SP - 136
EP - 146
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
SN - 2163-0755
IS - 1
ER -