Trauma system structure and viability in the current healthcare environment

A state-by-state assessment

N. Clay Mann, Ellen J Mackenzie, Sandra D. Teitelbaum, Dagan Wright, Cheryl Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that some state trauma systems are struggling to remain solvent while others appear stable in the current health care environment. The purpose of this research is to characterize the current structure and viability of state trauma systems in the U.S. Methods: Expert panels were convened in all 50 states to characterize the current structure of trauma care and to identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing trauma care delivery in each state. Results: States continue to value the formalization of trauma systems. System operations, evaluation/research methods and trauma leadership are highly valued by states with mature systems. However, all states consider their trauma system severely threatened by inadequate funding and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians and nurses. Conclusion: Trauma care systems are valued and demonstrate potential for future expansion. However, economic shortfalls and retention of medical personnel threaten the viability of current systems across the U.S.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-146
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Wounds and Injuries
Operations Research
Nurses
Economics
Physicians
Research

Keywords

  • Health care
  • Trauma center
  • Trauma system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Trauma system structure and viability in the current healthcare environment : A state-by-state assessment. / Mann, N. Clay; Mackenzie, Ellen J; Teitelbaum, Sandra D.; Wright, Dagan; Anderson, Cheryl.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 136-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4d5ce54469349ecabcf5c402d5bdf46,
title = "Trauma system structure and viability in the current healthcare environment: A state-by-state assessment",
abstract = "Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that some state trauma systems are struggling to remain solvent while others appear stable in the current health care environment. The purpose of this research is to characterize the current structure and viability of state trauma systems in the U.S. Methods: Expert panels were convened in all 50 states to characterize the current structure of trauma care and to identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing trauma care delivery in each state. Results: States continue to value the formalization of trauma systems. System operations, evaluation/research methods and trauma leadership are highly valued by states with mature systems. However, all states consider their trauma system severely threatened by inadequate funding and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians and nurses. Conclusion: Trauma care systems are valued and demonstrate potential for future expansion. However, economic shortfalls and retention of medical personnel threaten the viability of current systems across the U.S.",
keywords = "Health care, Trauma center, Trauma system",
author = "Mann, {N. Clay} and Mackenzie, {Ellen J} and Teitelbaum, {Sandra D.} and Dagan Wright and Cheryl Anderson",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.TA.0000151181.44658.0A",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "136--146",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trauma system structure and viability in the current healthcare environment

T2 - A state-by-state assessment

AU - Mann, N. Clay

AU - Mackenzie, Ellen J

AU - Teitelbaum, Sandra D.

AU - Wright, Dagan

AU - Anderson, Cheryl

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that some state trauma systems are struggling to remain solvent while others appear stable in the current health care environment. The purpose of this research is to characterize the current structure and viability of state trauma systems in the U.S. Methods: Expert panels were convened in all 50 states to characterize the current structure of trauma care and to identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing trauma care delivery in each state. Results: States continue to value the formalization of trauma systems. System operations, evaluation/research methods and trauma leadership are highly valued by states with mature systems. However, all states consider their trauma system severely threatened by inadequate funding and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians and nurses. Conclusion: Trauma care systems are valued and demonstrate potential for future expansion. However, economic shortfalls and retention of medical personnel threaten the viability of current systems across the U.S.

AB - Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that some state trauma systems are struggling to remain solvent while others appear stable in the current health care environment. The purpose of this research is to characterize the current structure and viability of state trauma systems in the U.S. Methods: Expert panels were convened in all 50 states to characterize the current structure of trauma care and to identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing trauma care delivery in each state. Results: States continue to value the formalization of trauma systems. System operations, evaluation/research methods and trauma leadership are highly valued by states with mature systems. However, all states consider their trauma system severely threatened by inadequate funding and difficulty recruiting and retaining physicians and nurses. Conclusion: Trauma care systems are valued and demonstrate potential for future expansion. However, economic shortfalls and retention of medical personnel threaten the viability of current systems across the U.S.

KW - Health care

KW - Trauma center

KW - Trauma system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13544271011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13544271011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.TA.0000151181.44658.0A

DO - 10.1097/01.TA.0000151181.44658.0A

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 136

EP - 146

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -