Transparency and dermatologic device approval by the US food and drug administration

Harib H. Ezaldein, Jeffrey F. Scott, Emily S. Yin, Alessandra Ventura, Nicholaas P. Deruyter, David J. Leffell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


IMPORTANCE The US Food and Drug Administration approves Class III medical devices via the premarket approval pathway, often requiring clinical data on safety and efficacy. Manufacturers can submit incremental device changes via supplemental applications, which are not subjected to such vetting measures and can cause understudied changes that lead to drift from a device's original design. OBJECTIVES To characterize the postapproval changes to Class III dermatologic devices and to evaluate inconsistencies in the use of the premarket approval pathway. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This studywas a cross-sectional retrospective cohort analysis of a public US Food and Drug Administration database for premarket approval of devices. Included were dermatologic devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between January 1, 1980, and November 1, 2016, through the premarket pathway for device approval. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Original deviceswere identified, and their supplements were characterized chronologically, by review track, and by modification category. RESULTS The 27 dermatologic devices studied consisted of 14 injectables, 11 photodynamic therapies, a dermal replacement matrix, and a diagnostic imaging instrument. Supplemental applications are increasingly used: the data-requiring panel-track pathway was the least common approach (2.8%[16 of 562 supplements]), while the 30-day track, which does not require clinical data, was most frequently used (42.5%[239 of 562 supplements]). Four devices (14.8%) underwent low-risk recalls (Class II or Class III), and 10 devices (37.0%) were voluntarily withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE As manufacturers make increasing use of supplemental applications, minor device changesmay occur without supporting clinical data, which could pose a safety risk to patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-280
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Dermatology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology


Dive into the research topics of 'Transparency and dermatologic device approval by the US food and drug administration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this