Translational Intracerebral Hemorrhage

a Need for Transparent Descriptions of Fresh Tissue Sampling and Preclinical Model Quality

Che Feng Chang, Li Cai, Jian Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For years, strategies have been proposed to improve translational success in stroke research by improving the quality of animal studies. However, articles that report preclinical intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) studies continue to lack adequate qualitative and quantitative descriptions of fresh brain tissue collection. They also tend to lack transparency about animal model quality. We conducted a systematic review of 82 ICH research articles to determine the level of detail reported for brain tissue collection. We found that only 24 (29 %) reported the volume, weight, or thickness of tissue collected and a specific description of the anatomical location. Thus, up to 71 % of preclinical ICH research articles did not properly define how fresh specimens were collected for biochemical measurements. Such omissions may impede reproducibility of results between laboratories. Although existing criteria have improved the quality of preclinical stroke studies, ICH researchers need to identify specific guidelines and strategies to avoid pitfalls, minimize bias, and increase reproducibility in this field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-389
Number of pages6
JournalTranslational Stroke Research
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 25 2015

Fingerprint

Cerebral Hemorrhage
Stroke
Research
Brain
Reproducibility of Results
Animal Models
Research Personnel
Guidelines
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Basic science
  • Hematoma
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Multidisciplinary collaboration
  • Preclinical criteria
  • Translational stroke research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Translational Intracerebral Hemorrhage : a Need for Transparent Descriptions of Fresh Tissue Sampling and Preclinical Model Quality. / Chang, Che Feng; Cai, Li; Wang, Jian.

In: Translational Stroke Research, Vol. 6, No. 5, 25.04.2015, p. 384-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2198846180048c28a7c01b44976a86e,
title = "Translational Intracerebral Hemorrhage: a Need for Transparent Descriptions of Fresh Tissue Sampling and Preclinical Model Quality",
abstract = "For years, strategies have been proposed to improve translational success in stroke research by improving the quality of animal studies. However, articles that report preclinical intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) studies continue to lack adequate qualitative and quantitative descriptions of fresh brain tissue collection. They also tend to lack transparency about animal model quality. We conducted a systematic review of 82 ICH research articles to determine the level of detail reported for brain tissue collection. We found that only 24 (29 {\%}) reported the volume, weight, or thickness of tissue collected and a specific description of the anatomical location. Thus, up to 71 {\%} of preclinical ICH research articles did not properly define how fresh specimens were collected for biochemical measurements. Such omissions may impede reproducibility of results between laboratories. Although existing criteria have improved the quality of preclinical stroke studies, ICH researchers need to identify specific guidelines and strategies to avoid pitfalls, minimize bias, and increase reproducibility in this field.",
keywords = "Basic science, Hematoma, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Multidisciplinary collaboration, Preclinical criteria, Translational stroke research",
author = "Chang, {Che Feng} and Li Cai and Jian Wang",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1007/s12975-015-0399-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "384--389",
journal = "Translational Stroke Research",
issn = "1868-4483",
publisher = "Springer US",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translational Intracerebral Hemorrhage

T2 - a Need for Transparent Descriptions of Fresh Tissue Sampling and Preclinical Model Quality

AU - Chang, Che Feng

AU - Cai, Li

AU - Wang, Jian

PY - 2015/4/25

Y1 - 2015/4/25

N2 - For years, strategies have been proposed to improve translational success in stroke research by improving the quality of animal studies. However, articles that report preclinical intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) studies continue to lack adequate qualitative and quantitative descriptions of fresh brain tissue collection. They also tend to lack transparency about animal model quality. We conducted a systematic review of 82 ICH research articles to determine the level of detail reported for brain tissue collection. We found that only 24 (29 %) reported the volume, weight, or thickness of tissue collected and a specific description of the anatomical location. Thus, up to 71 % of preclinical ICH research articles did not properly define how fresh specimens were collected for biochemical measurements. Such omissions may impede reproducibility of results between laboratories. Although existing criteria have improved the quality of preclinical stroke studies, ICH researchers need to identify specific guidelines and strategies to avoid pitfalls, minimize bias, and increase reproducibility in this field.

AB - For years, strategies have been proposed to improve translational success in stroke research by improving the quality of animal studies. However, articles that report preclinical intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) studies continue to lack adequate qualitative and quantitative descriptions of fresh brain tissue collection. They also tend to lack transparency about animal model quality. We conducted a systematic review of 82 ICH research articles to determine the level of detail reported for brain tissue collection. We found that only 24 (29 %) reported the volume, weight, or thickness of tissue collected and a specific description of the anatomical location. Thus, up to 71 % of preclinical ICH research articles did not properly define how fresh specimens were collected for biochemical measurements. Such omissions may impede reproducibility of results between laboratories. Although existing criteria have improved the quality of preclinical stroke studies, ICH researchers need to identify specific guidelines and strategies to avoid pitfalls, minimize bias, and increase reproducibility in this field.

KW - Basic science

KW - Hematoma

KW - Intracerebral hemorrhage

KW - Multidisciplinary collaboration

KW - Preclinical criteria

KW - Translational stroke research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941187764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941187764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12975-015-0399-5

DO - 10.1007/s12975-015-0399-5

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 384

EP - 389

JO - Translational Stroke Research

JF - Translational Stroke Research

SN - 1868-4483

IS - 5

ER -