Training Retention of Level C Personal Protective Equipment Use by Emergency Medical Services Personnel

William E. Northington, G. Michael Mahoney, Michael E. Hahn, Joe Suyama, Dave Hostler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the six-month training retention for out-of-hospital providers donning and doffing Level C personal protective equipment (PPE). Methods: In this prospective observational study, 36 out-of-hospital providers enrolled in a paramedic program were trained in Level C (chemical-resistant coverall, butyl gloves, and boots and an air-purifying respirator) PPE use. A standardized training module and checklist of critical actions developed by a hazardous materials (hazmat) technician were used to evaluate donning and doffing. Students were trained until they were able to correctly don and doff the Level C PPE. An investigator used the checklist accompanying the training module to assess proficiency and remediate mistakes. Six months after initial training, the subjects were reassessed using the same investigator and checklist. Errors were designated as either critical (resulted in major self-contamination of the airway, such as early removal of the respirator) or noncritical (potentially resulted in minor self-contamination not involving the airway). Results: Only five subjects (14.3%) were able to don and doff PPE without committing a critical error. The most common critical errors were premature removal of the respirator (65.7%; n = 23) and actions allowing the contaminated suit to touch the body (54.3%; n = 19). The most common noncritical error was possible self-contamination due to the boots not being removed before exposing other body parts (37.1%; n = 13). Of the seven subjects (20%) with additional prior hazmat training, only two donned and doffed PPE without committing a critical error. Conclusions: Retention of proper donning and doffing techniques in paramedic students is poor at six months after initial training. Even in subjects with previous hazmat, firefighter, and emergency medical services training, critical errors were common, suggesting that current training may be inadequate to prevent harmful exposures in emergency medical services personnel working at a hazmat or weapons of mass destruction incident.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)846-849
Number of pages4
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Hazardous Substances
Checklist
Allied Health Personnel
Mechanical Ventilators
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Respiratory Protective Devices
Research Personnel
Firefighters
Students
Touch
Human Body
Observational Studies
Personal Protective Equipment
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • first responder
  • PPE
  • safety
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Training Retention of Level C Personal Protective Equipment Use by Emergency Medical Services Personnel. / Northington, William E.; Mahoney, G. Michael; Hahn, Michael E.; Suyama, Joe; Hostler, Dave.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 846-849.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Northington, William E. ; Mahoney, G. Michael ; Hahn, Michael E. ; Suyama, Joe ; Hostler, Dave. / Training Retention of Level C Personal Protective Equipment Use by Emergency Medical Services Personnel. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 10. pp. 846-849.
@article{3771c85850224cb0a8ad5c87fb4d4f49,
title = "Training Retention of Level C Personal Protective Equipment Use by Emergency Medical Services Personnel",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the six-month training retention for out-of-hospital providers donning and doffing Level C personal protective equipment (PPE). Methods: In this prospective observational study, 36 out-of-hospital providers enrolled in a paramedic program were trained in Level C (chemical-resistant coverall, butyl gloves, and boots and an air-purifying respirator) PPE use. A standardized training module and checklist of critical actions developed by a hazardous materials (hazmat) technician were used to evaluate donning and doffing. Students were trained until they were able to correctly don and doff the Level C PPE. An investigator used the checklist accompanying the training module to assess proficiency and remediate mistakes. Six months after initial training, the subjects were reassessed using the same investigator and checklist. Errors were designated as either critical (resulted in major self-contamination of the airway, such as early removal of the respirator) or noncritical (potentially resulted in minor self-contamination not involving the airway). Results: Only five subjects (14.3{\%}) were able to don and doff PPE without committing a critical error. The most common critical errors were premature removal of the respirator (65.7{\%}; n = 23) and actions allowing the contaminated suit to touch the body (54.3{\%}; n = 19). The most common noncritical error was possible self-contamination due to the boots not being removed before exposing other body parts (37.1{\%}; n = 13). Of the seven subjects (20{\%}) with additional prior hazmat training, only two donned and doffed PPE without committing a critical error. Conclusions: Retention of proper donning and doffing techniques in paramedic students is poor at six months after initial training. Even in subjects with previous hazmat, firefighter, and emergency medical services training, critical errors were common, suggesting that current training may be inadequate to prevent harmful exposures in emergency medical services personnel working at a hazmat or weapons of mass destruction incident.",
keywords = "first responder, PPE, safety, training",
author = "Northington, {William E.} and Mahoney, {G. Michael} and Hahn, {Michael E.} and Joe Suyama and Dave Hostler",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "846--849",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training Retention of Level C Personal Protective Equipment Use by Emergency Medical Services Personnel

AU - Northington, William E.

AU - Mahoney, G. Michael

AU - Hahn, Michael E.

AU - Suyama, Joe

AU - Hostler, Dave

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Objectives: To assess the six-month training retention for out-of-hospital providers donning and doffing Level C personal protective equipment (PPE). Methods: In this prospective observational study, 36 out-of-hospital providers enrolled in a paramedic program were trained in Level C (chemical-resistant coverall, butyl gloves, and boots and an air-purifying respirator) PPE use. A standardized training module and checklist of critical actions developed by a hazardous materials (hazmat) technician were used to evaluate donning and doffing. Students were trained until they were able to correctly don and doff the Level C PPE. An investigator used the checklist accompanying the training module to assess proficiency and remediate mistakes. Six months after initial training, the subjects were reassessed using the same investigator and checklist. Errors were designated as either critical (resulted in major self-contamination of the airway, such as early removal of the respirator) or noncritical (potentially resulted in minor self-contamination not involving the airway). Results: Only five subjects (14.3%) were able to don and doff PPE without committing a critical error. The most common critical errors were premature removal of the respirator (65.7%; n = 23) and actions allowing the contaminated suit to touch the body (54.3%; n = 19). The most common noncritical error was possible self-contamination due to the boots not being removed before exposing other body parts (37.1%; n = 13). Of the seven subjects (20%) with additional prior hazmat training, only two donned and doffed PPE without committing a critical error. Conclusions: Retention of proper donning and doffing techniques in paramedic students is poor at six months after initial training. Even in subjects with previous hazmat, firefighter, and emergency medical services training, critical errors were common, suggesting that current training may be inadequate to prevent harmful exposures in emergency medical services personnel working at a hazmat or weapons of mass destruction incident.

AB - Objectives: To assess the six-month training retention for out-of-hospital providers donning and doffing Level C personal protective equipment (PPE). Methods: In this prospective observational study, 36 out-of-hospital providers enrolled in a paramedic program were trained in Level C (chemical-resistant coverall, butyl gloves, and boots and an air-purifying respirator) PPE use. A standardized training module and checklist of critical actions developed by a hazardous materials (hazmat) technician were used to evaluate donning and doffing. Students were trained until they were able to correctly don and doff the Level C PPE. An investigator used the checklist accompanying the training module to assess proficiency and remediate mistakes. Six months after initial training, the subjects were reassessed using the same investigator and checklist. Errors were designated as either critical (resulted in major self-contamination of the airway, such as early removal of the respirator) or noncritical (potentially resulted in minor self-contamination not involving the airway). Results: Only five subjects (14.3%) were able to don and doff PPE without committing a critical error. The most common critical errors were premature removal of the respirator (65.7%; n = 23) and actions allowing the contaminated suit to touch the body (54.3%; n = 19). The most common noncritical error was possible self-contamination due to the boots not being removed before exposing other body parts (37.1%; n = 13). Of the seven subjects (20%) with additional prior hazmat training, only two donned and doffed PPE without committing a critical error. Conclusions: Retention of proper donning and doffing techniques in paramedic students is poor at six months after initial training. Even in subjects with previous hazmat, firefighter, and emergency medical services training, critical errors were common, suggesting that current training may be inadequate to prevent harmful exposures in emergency medical services personnel working at a hazmat or weapons of mass destruction incident.

KW - first responder

KW - PPE

KW - safety

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548808048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548808048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.034

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 17898247

AN - SCOPUS:34548808048

VL - 14

SP - 846

EP - 849

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 10

ER -