Tradeoffs driving policy and research decisions in biosurveillance

Howard S. Burkom, Wayne A. Loschen, Zaruhi R. Mnatsakanyan, Joseph S. Lombardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In view of concerns over bioterrorism, pandemic Influenza, and other public health threats, development of advanced surveillance systems to corroborate and supplement physician sentinel surveillance is a research imperative. Objectives of this article are to describe Interrelated decisions underlying the design of a public health surveillance system and to show these decisions' effects on data acquisition and transfer, on analysis methods, and on visualization tools. Some of these decisions are dictated by data limitations, others by goals and resources of the monitoring organization. Most such decisions involve three characteristic tradeoffs: the extent of monitoring for exceptional versus customary health threats, the level of data aggregation for monitoring, and the degree of automation to be used. A fundamental motivation is to extract outbreak information from background noise to empower epidemiologists monitoring public health on a day-to-day basis. This article discusses each of these tradeoffs and Illustrates them with three detailed examples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-312
Number of pages14
JournalJohns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory)
Volume27
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

tradeoffs
public health
Public health
surveillance
Monitoring
Bioterrorism
influenza
physicians
supplements
background noise
Data transfer
automation
health
data acquisition
Data acquisition
resources
Automation
Agglomeration
Visualization
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Tradeoffs driving policy and research decisions in biosurveillance. / Burkom, Howard S.; Loschen, Wayne A.; Mnatsakanyan, Zaruhi R.; Lombardo, Joseph S.

In: Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory), Vol. 27, No. 4, 2008, p. 299-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burkom, Howard S. ; Loschen, Wayne A. ; Mnatsakanyan, Zaruhi R. ; Lombardo, Joseph S. / Tradeoffs driving policy and research decisions in biosurveillance. In: Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory). 2008 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 299-312.
@article{bd14473bafa5401eb8726bb98f7fc78e,
title = "Tradeoffs driving policy and research decisions in biosurveillance",
abstract = "In view of concerns over bioterrorism, pandemic Influenza, and other public health threats, development of advanced surveillance systems to corroborate and supplement physician sentinel surveillance is a research imperative. Objectives of this article are to describe Interrelated decisions underlying the design of a public health surveillance system and to show these decisions' effects on data acquisition and transfer, on analysis methods, and on visualization tools. Some of these decisions are dictated by data limitations, others by goals and resources of the monitoring organization. Most such decisions involve three characteristic tradeoffs: the extent of monitoring for exceptional versus customary health threats, the level of data aggregation for monitoring, and the degree of automation to be used. A fundamental motivation is to extract outbreak information from background noise to empower epidemiologists monitoring public health on a day-to-day basis. This article discusses each of these tradeoffs and Illustrates them with three detailed examples.",
author = "Burkom, {Howard S.} and Loschen, {Wayne A.} and Mnatsakanyan, {Zaruhi R.} and Lombardo, {Joseph S.}",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "299--312",
journal = "Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory)",
issn = "0270-5214",
publisher = "John Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tradeoffs driving policy and research decisions in biosurveillance

AU - Burkom, Howard S.

AU - Loschen, Wayne A.

AU - Mnatsakanyan, Zaruhi R.

AU - Lombardo, Joseph S.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In view of concerns over bioterrorism, pandemic Influenza, and other public health threats, development of advanced surveillance systems to corroborate and supplement physician sentinel surveillance is a research imperative. Objectives of this article are to describe Interrelated decisions underlying the design of a public health surveillance system and to show these decisions' effects on data acquisition and transfer, on analysis methods, and on visualization tools. Some of these decisions are dictated by data limitations, others by goals and resources of the monitoring organization. Most such decisions involve three characteristic tradeoffs: the extent of monitoring for exceptional versus customary health threats, the level of data aggregation for monitoring, and the degree of automation to be used. A fundamental motivation is to extract outbreak information from background noise to empower epidemiologists monitoring public health on a day-to-day basis. This article discusses each of these tradeoffs and Illustrates them with three detailed examples.

AB - In view of concerns over bioterrorism, pandemic Influenza, and other public health threats, development of advanced surveillance systems to corroborate and supplement physician sentinel surveillance is a research imperative. Objectives of this article are to describe Interrelated decisions underlying the design of a public health surveillance system and to show these decisions' effects on data acquisition and transfer, on analysis methods, and on visualization tools. Some of these decisions are dictated by data limitations, others by goals and resources of the monitoring organization. Most such decisions involve three characteristic tradeoffs: the extent of monitoring for exceptional versus customary health threats, the level of data aggregation for monitoring, and the degree of automation to be used. A fundamental motivation is to extract outbreak information from background noise to empower epidemiologists monitoring public health on a day-to-day basis. This article discusses each of these tradeoffs and Illustrates them with three detailed examples.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45849135660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45849135660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 299

EP - 312

JO - Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory)

JF - Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory)

SN - 0270-5214

IS - 4

ER -