Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy

X. Ronald Zhu, Yupeng Li, Dennis Mackin, Heng Li, Falk Poenisch, Andrew K. Lee, Anita Mahajan, Steven J. Frank, Michael T. Gillin, Narayan Sahoo, Xiaodong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

An intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) program based on measurement alone can be very time consuming due to the highly modulated dose distributions of IMPT fields. Incorporating independent dose calculation and treatment log file analysis could reduce the time required for measurements. In this article, we summarize our effort to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program that consists of three components: measurements, independent dose calculation, and analysis of patient-specific treatment delivery log files. Measurements included two-dimensional (2D) measurements using an ionization chamber array detector for each field delivered at the planned gantry angles with the electronic medical record (EMR) system in the QA mode and the accelerator control system (ACS) in the treatment mode, and additional measurements at depths for each field with the ACS in physics mode and without the EMR system. Dose distributions for each field in a water phantom were calculated independently using a recently developed in-house pencil beam algorithm and compared with those obtained using the treatment planning system (TPS). The treatment log file for each field was analyzed in terms of deviations in delivered spot positions from their planned positions using various statistical methods. Using this improved PSQA program, we were able to verify the integrity of the data transfer from the TPS to the EMR to the ACS, the dose calculation of the TPS, and the treatment delivery, including the dose delivered and spot positions. On the basis of this experience, we estimate that the in-room measurement time required for each complex IMPT case (e.g., a patient receiving bilateral IMPT for head and neck cancer) is less than 1 h using the improved PSQA program. Our experience demonstrates that it is possible to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program for IMPT with the equipment and resources available in the clinic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)631-647
Number of pages17
JournalCancers
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 10 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Proton Therapy
Electronic Health Records
Therapeutics
Physics
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Equipment and Supplies
Water

Keywords

  • IMPT
  • Patient specific QA
  • SFIB
  • SFO
  • Spot scanning proton therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy. / Zhu, X. Ronald; Li, Yupeng; Mackin, Dennis; Li, Heng; Poenisch, Falk; Lee, Andrew K.; Mahajan, Anita; Frank, Steven J.; Gillin, Michael T.; Sahoo, Narayan; Zhang, Xiaodong.

In: Cancers, Vol. 7, No. 2, 10.04.2015, p. 631-647.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Zhu, XR, Li, Y, Mackin, D, Li, H, Poenisch, F, Lee, AK, Mahajan, A, Frank, SJ, Gillin, MT, Sahoo, N & Zhang, X 2015, 'Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy', Cancers, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 631-647. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7020631
Zhu, X. Ronald ; Li, Yupeng ; Mackin, Dennis ; Li, Heng ; Poenisch, Falk ; Lee, Andrew K. ; Mahajan, Anita ; Frank, Steven J. ; Gillin, Michael T. ; Sahoo, Narayan ; Zhang, Xiaodong. / Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy. In: Cancers. 2015 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 631-647.
@article{9f7286ef7fef45d68a5f6590f8c80001,
title = "Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy",
abstract = "An intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) program based on measurement alone can be very time consuming due to the highly modulated dose distributions of IMPT fields. Incorporating independent dose calculation and treatment log file analysis could reduce the time required for measurements. In this article, we summarize our effort to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program that consists of three components: measurements, independent dose calculation, and analysis of patient-specific treatment delivery log files. Measurements included two-dimensional (2D) measurements using an ionization chamber array detector for each field delivered at the planned gantry angles with the electronic medical record (EMR) system in the QA mode and the accelerator control system (ACS) in the treatment mode, and additional measurements at depths for each field with the ACS in physics mode and without the EMR system. Dose distributions for each field in a water phantom were calculated independently using a recently developed in-house pencil beam algorithm and compared with those obtained using the treatment planning system (TPS). The treatment log file for each field was analyzed in terms of deviations in delivered spot positions from their planned positions using various statistical methods. Using this improved PSQA program, we were able to verify the integrity of the data transfer from the TPS to the EMR to the ACS, the dose calculation of the TPS, and the treatment delivery, including the dose delivered and spot positions. On the basis of this experience, we estimate that the in-room measurement time required for each complex IMPT case (e.g., a patient receiving bilateral IMPT for head and neck cancer) is less than 1 h using the improved PSQA program. Our experience demonstrates that it is possible to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program for IMPT with the equipment and resources available in the clinic.",
keywords = "IMPT, Patient specific QA, SFIB, SFO, Spot scanning proton therapy",
author = "Zhu, {X. Ronald} and Yupeng Li and Dennis Mackin and Heng Li and Falk Poenisch and Lee, {Andrew K.} and Anita Mahajan and Frank, {Steven J.} and Gillin, {Michael T.} and Narayan Sahoo and Xiaodong Zhang",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "10",
doi = "10.3390/cancers7020631",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "631--647",
journal = "Cancers",
issn = "2072-6694",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards effective and efficient patient-specific quality assurance for spot scanning proton therapy

AU - Zhu, X. Ronald

AU - Li, Yupeng

AU - Mackin, Dennis

AU - Li, Heng

AU - Poenisch, Falk

AU - Lee, Andrew K.

AU - Mahajan, Anita

AU - Frank, Steven J.

AU - Gillin, Michael T.

AU - Sahoo, Narayan

AU - Zhang, Xiaodong

PY - 2015/4/10

Y1 - 2015/4/10

N2 - An intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) program based on measurement alone can be very time consuming due to the highly modulated dose distributions of IMPT fields. Incorporating independent dose calculation and treatment log file analysis could reduce the time required for measurements. In this article, we summarize our effort to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program that consists of three components: measurements, independent dose calculation, and analysis of patient-specific treatment delivery log files. Measurements included two-dimensional (2D) measurements using an ionization chamber array detector for each field delivered at the planned gantry angles with the electronic medical record (EMR) system in the QA mode and the accelerator control system (ACS) in the treatment mode, and additional measurements at depths for each field with the ACS in physics mode and without the EMR system. Dose distributions for each field in a water phantom were calculated independently using a recently developed in-house pencil beam algorithm and compared with those obtained using the treatment planning system (TPS). The treatment log file for each field was analyzed in terms of deviations in delivered spot positions from their planned positions using various statistical methods. Using this improved PSQA program, we were able to verify the integrity of the data transfer from the TPS to the EMR to the ACS, the dose calculation of the TPS, and the treatment delivery, including the dose delivered and spot positions. On the basis of this experience, we estimate that the in-room measurement time required for each complex IMPT case (e.g., a patient receiving bilateral IMPT for head and neck cancer) is less than 1 h using the improved PSQA program. Our experience demonstrates that it is possible to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program for IMPT with the equipment and resources available in the clinic.

AB - An intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) program based on measurement alone can be very time consuming due to the highly modulated dose distributions of IMPT fields. Incorporating independent dose calculation and treatment log file analysis could reduce the time required for measurements. In this article, we summarize our effort to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program that consists of three components: measurements, independent dose calculation, and analysis of patient-specific treatment delivery log files. Measurements included two-dimensional (2D) measurements using an ionization chamber array detector for each field delivered at the planned gantry angles with the electronic medical record (EMR) system in the QA mode and the accelerator control system (ACS) in the treatment mode, and additional measurements at depths for each field with the ACS in physics mode and without the EMR system. Dose distributions for each field in a water phantom were calculated independently using a recently developed in-house pencil beam algorithm and compared with those obtained using the treatment planning system (TPS). The treatment log file for each field was analyzed in terms of deviations in delivered spot positions from their planned positions using various statistical methods. Using this improved PSQA program, we were able to verify the integrity of the data transfer from the TPS to the EMR to the ACS, the dose calculation of the TPS, and the treatment delivery, including the dose delivered and spot positions. On the basis of this experience, we estimate that the in-room measurement time required for each complex IMPT case (e.g., a patient receiving bilateral IMPT for head and neck cancer) is less than 1 h using the improved PSQA program. Our experience demonstrates that it is possible to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program for IMPT with the equipment and resources available in the clinic.

KW - IMPT

KW - Patient specific QA

KW - SFIB

KW - SFO

KW - Spot scanning proton therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929410265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929410265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/cancers7020631

DO - 10.3390/cancers7020631

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84929410265

VL - 7

SP - 631

EP - 647

JO - Cancers

JF - Cancers

SN - 2072-6694

IS - 2

ER -