Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: A working model

Bridget Pratt, Maria Merritt, Adnan A. Hyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments with national research priorities presupposes that such national priorities exist and are just. Arguably, justice requires national health research priority-setting to promote health equity. Such a position is consistent with recommendations made by the World Health Organization and at global ministerial summits that health research should serve to reduce health inequalities between and within countries. Thus far, no specific requirements for equity-oriented research priority-setting have been described to guide policymakers. As a step towards the explication and defence of such requirements, we propose that deep inclusion is a key procedural component of equity-oriented research priority-setting. We offer a model of deep inclusion that was developed by applying concepts from work on deliberative democracy and development ethics. This model consists of three dimensions-breadth, qualitative equality, and high-quality non-elite participation. Deep inclusion is captured not only by who is invited to join a decision-making process but also by how they are involved and by when non-elite stakeholders are involved. To clarify and illustrate the proposed dimensions, we use the sustained example of health systems research. We conclude by reviewing practical challenges to achieving deep inclusion. Despite the existence of barriers to implementation, our model can help policymakers and other stakeholders design more inclusive national health research priority-setting processes and assess these processes' depth of inclusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-224
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume151
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Health Priorities
equity
inclusion
health
Research
Health
stakeholder
deliberative democracy
Democracy
systems research
Health Research
Equity
Inclusion
WHO
Social Justice
decision-making process
equality
Ethics
justice
moral philosophy

Keywords

  • Health equity
  • Health research
  • Health systems research
  • Inclusion
  • Justice
  • Priority-setting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting : A working model. / Pratt, Bridget; Merritt, Maria; Hyder, Adnan A.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 151, 01.02.2016, p. 215-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a243a074bf7d4ee48ea53028a8b8cf22,
title = "Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: A working model",
abstract = "Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments with national research priorities presupposes that such national priorities exist and are just. Arguably, justice requires national health research priority-setting to promote health equity. Such a position is consistent with recommendations made by the World Health Organization and at global ministerial summits that health research should serve to reduce health inequalities between and within countries. Thus far, no specific requirements for equity-oriented research priority-setting have been described to guide policymakers. As a step towards the explication and defence of such requirements, we propose that deep inclusion is a key procedural component of equity-oriented research priority-setting. We offer a model of deep inclusion that was developed by applying concepts from work on deliberative democracy and development ethics. This model consists of three dimensions-breadth, qualitative equality, and high-quality non-elite participation. Deep inclusion is captured not only by who is invited to join a decision-making process but also by how they are involved and by when non-elite stakeholders are involved. To clarify and illustrate the proposed dimensions, we use the sustained example of health systems research. We conclude by reviewing practical challenges to achieving deep inclusion. Despite the existence of barriers to implementation, our model can help policymakers and other stakeholders design more inclusive national health research priority-setting processes and assess these processes' depth of inclusion.",
keywords = "Health equity, Health research, Health systems research, Inclusion, Justice, Priority-setting",
author = "Bridget Pratt and Maria Merritt and Hyder, {Adnan A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "215--224",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting

T2 - A working model

AU - Pratt, Bridget

AU - Merritt, Maria

AU - Hyder, Adnan A.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments with national research priorities presupposes that such national priorities exist and are just. Arguably, justice requires national health research priority-setting to promote health equity. Such a position is consistent with recommendations made by the World Health Organization and at global ministerial summits that health research should serve to reduce health inequalities between and within countries. Thus far, no specific requirements for equity-oriented research priority-setting have been described to guide policymakers. As a step towards the explication and defence of such requirements, we propose that deep inclusion is a key procedural component of equity-oriented research priority-setting. We offer a model of deep inclusion that was developed by applying concepts from work on deliberative democracy and development ethics. This model consists of three dimensions-breadth, qualitative equality, and high-quality non-elite participation. Deep inclusion is captured not only by who is invited to join a decision-making process but also by how they are involved and by when non-elite stakeholders are involved. To clarify and illustrate the proposed dimensions, we use the sustained example of health systems research. We conclude by reviewing practical challenges to achieving deep inclusion. Despite the existence of barriers to implementation, our model can help policymakers and other stakeholders design more inclusive national health research priority-setting processes and assess these processes' depth of inclusion.

AB - Growing consensus that health research funders should align their investments with national research priorities presupposes that such national priorities exist and are just. Arguably, justice requires national health research priority-setting to promote health equity. Such a position is consistent with recommendations made by the World Health Organization and at global ministerial summits that health research should serve to reduce health inequalities between and within countries. Thus far, no specific requirements for equity-oriented research priority-setting have been described to guide policymakers. As a step towards the explication and defence of such requirements, we propose that deep inclusion is a key procedural component of equity-oriented research priority-setting. We offer a model of deep inclusion that was developed by applying concepts from work on deliberative democracy and development ethics. This model consists of three dimensions-breadth, qualitative equality, and high-quality non-elite participation. Deep inclusion is captured not only by who is invited to join a decision-making process but also by how they are involved and by when non-elite stakeholders are involved. To clarify and illustrate the proposed dimensions, we use the sustained example of health systems research. We conclude by reviewing practical challenges to achieving deep inclusion. Despite the existence of barriers to implementation, our model can help policymakers and other stakeholders design more inclusive national health research priority-setting processes and assess these processes' depth of inclusion.

KW - Health equity

KW - Health research

KW - Health systems research

KW - Inclusion

KW - Justice

KW - Priority-setting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955163611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955163611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.018

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 26812416

AN - SCOPUS:84955163611

VL - 151

SP - 215

EP - 224

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -