Toward a common language for measuring patient mobility in the hospital: Reliability and construct validity of interprofessional mobility measures

Erik H. Hoyer, Daniel L. Young, Lisa M. Klein, Julie Kreif, Kara Shumock, Stephanie Hiser, Michael Friedman, Annette Lavezza, Alan Jette, Kitty S. Chan, Dale M. Needham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. The lack of common language among interprofessional inpatient clinical teams is an important barrier to achieving inpatient mobilization. In The Johns Hopkins Hospital, the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Inpatient Mobility Short Form (IMSF), also called "6-Clicks," and the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) are part of routine clinical practice. The measurement characteristics of these tools when used by both nurses and physical therapists for interprofessional communication or assessment are unknown. Objective. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the reliability and minimal detectable change of AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM when completed by nurses and physical therapists and to evaluate the construct validity of both measures when used by nurses. Design. A prospective evaluation of a convenience sample was used. Methods. The test-retest reliability and the interrater reliability of AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM for inpatients in the neuroscience department (n = 118) of an academic medical center were evaluated. Each participant was independently scored twice by a team of 2 nurses and 1 physical therapist; a total of 4 physical therapists and 8 nurses participated in reliability testing. In a separate inpatient study protocol (n = 69), construct validity was evaluated via an assessment of convergent validity with other measures of function (grip strength, Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale, 2-minute walk test, 5-times sit-to-stand test) used by 5 nurses. Results. The test-retest reliability values (intraclass correlation coefficients) for physical therapists and nurses were 0.91 and 0.97, respectively, for AM-PAC IMSF and 0.94 and 0.95, respectively, for JH-HLM. The interrater reliability values (intraclass correlation coefficients) between physical therapists and nurses were 0.96 for AM-PAC IMSF and 0.99 for JH-HLM. Construct validity (Spearman correlations) ranged from 0.25 between JH-HLM and right-hand grip strength to 0.80 between AM-PAC IMSF and the Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale. Limitations. The results were obtained from inpatients in the neuroscience department of a single hospital. Conclusions. The AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM had excellent interrater reliability and test-retest reliability for both physical therapists and nurses. The evaluation of convergent validity suggested that AM-PAC IMSF and JH-HLM measured constructs of patient mobility and physical functioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberpzx110
Pages (from-to)133-142
Number of pages10
JournalPhysical therapy
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Hoyer, E. H., Young, D. L., Klein, L. M., Kreif, J., Shumock, K., Hiser, S., Friedman, M., Lavezza, A., Jette, A., Chan, K. S., & Needham, D. M. (2018). Toward a common language for measuring patient mobility in the hospital: Reliability and construct validity of interprofessional mobility measures. Physical therapy, 98(2), 133-142. [pzx110]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzx110