Total knee arthroplasty fixation

Comparison of the early results of paired cemented versus uncemented Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses

C. A F Dodd, D. S. Hungerford, K. A. Krackow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The results of 18 matched pairs of Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses were studied to compare the early clinical and functional performance of cemented versus uncemented fixation with an average five-year follow-up period for both. The knee score improved from a preoperative average of 35 points to a postoperative average of 90 points in the cemented group, and from 38 points to 93 points in the uncemented group. In particular, the individual pain scores and the range-of-motion values were well matched at the three-, six-, and 12-month follow-up visits and showed a steady improvement. Subjectively, all patients were pleased with the results of surgery; one-third preferred the cemented side, one-third preferred the uncemented side, and one-third found no difference in the performance of either knee. The clinical and functional performance of knee prostheses in patients who had one cemented knee and one uncemented knee were comparable and possibly unrelated to the type of fixation method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-70
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number260
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Knee Prosthesis
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Knee
Articular Range of Motion
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Total knee arthroplasty fixation : Comparison of the early results of paired cemented versus uncemented Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses. / Dodd, C. A F; Hungerford, D. S.; Krackow, K. A.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 260, 1990, p. 66-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87b3035e295747d295fa480df6b84581,
title = "Total knee arthroplasty fixation: Comparison of the early results of paired cemented versus uncemented Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses",
abstract = "The results of 18 matched pairs of Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses were studied to compare the early clinical and functional performance of cemented versus uncemented fixation with an average five-year follow-up period for both. The knee score improved from a preoperative average of 35 points to a postoperative average of 90 points in the cemented group, and from 38 points to 93 points in the uncemented group. In particular, the individual pain scores and the range-of-motion values were well matched at the three-, six-, and 12-month follow-up visits and showed a steady improvement. Subjectively, all patients were pleased with the results of surgery; one-third preferred the cemented side, one-third preferred the uncemented side, and one-third found no difference in the performance of either knee. The clinical and functional performance of knee prostheses in patients who had one cemented knee and one uncemented knee were comparable and possibly unrelated to the type of fixation method.",
author = "Dodd, {C. A F} and Hungerford, {D. S.} and Krackow, {K. A.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "66--70",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "260",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Total knee arthroplasty fixation

T2 - Comparison of the early results of paired cemented versus uncemented Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses

AU - Dodd, C. A F

AU - Hungerford, D. S.

AU - Krackow, K. A.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The results of 18 matched pairs of Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses were studied to compare the early clinical and functional performance of cemented versus uncemented fixation with an average five-year follow-up period for both. The knee score improved from a preoperative average of 35 points to a postoperative average of 90 points in the cemented group, and from 38 points to 93 points in the uncemented group. In particular, the individual pain scores and the range-of-motion values were well matched at the three-, six-, and 12-month follow-up visits and showed a steady improvement. Subjectively, all patients were pleased with the results of surgery; one-third preferred the cemented side, one-third preferred the uncemented side, and one-third found no difference in the performance of either knee. The clinical and functional performance of knee prostheses in patients who had one cemented knee and one uncemented knee were comparable and possibly unrelated to the type of fixation method.

AB - The results of 18 matched pairs of Porous Coated Anatomic knee prostheses were studied to compare the early clinical and functional performance of cemented versus uncemented fixation with an average five-year follow-up period for both. The knee score improved from a preoperative average of 35 points to a postoperative average of 90 points in the cemented group, and from 38 points to 93 points in the uncemented group. In particular, the individual pain scores and the range-of-motion values were well matched at the three-, six-, and 12-month follow-up visits and showed a steady improvement. Subjectively, all patients were pleased with the results of surgery; one-third preferred the cemented side, one-third preferred the uncemented side, and one-third found no difference in the performance of either knee. The clinical and functional performance of knee prostheses in patients who had one cemented knee and one uncemented knee were comparable and possibly unrelated to the type of fixation method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025095960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025095960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 66

EP - 70

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 260

ER -