Topical nepafenec in eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema

Scott M. Friedman, Talat H. Almukhtar, Carl W. Baker, Adam R. Glassman, Michael J. Elman, Neil M. Bressler, Manvi P. Maker, Lee M. Jampol, Michele Melia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a topical, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, nepafenac 0.1%, in eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema. Methods: Multicenter, double-masked randomized trial. Individuals with good visual acuity and noncentral-involved diabetic macular edema were randomly assigned to nepafenac 0.1% (N 61) or placebo (nepafenac vehicle, N 64) 3 times a day for 12 months. The primary outcome was mean change in optical coherence tomography retinal volume at 12 months. Results: Mean baseline retinal volume was 7.8 mm 3. At 12 months, in the nepafenac and placebo groups respectively, mean change in retinal volume was -0.03 mm 3 and -0.02 mm 3 (treatment group difference: -0.02, 95% confidence interval: -0.27 to 0.23, P 0.89). Central-involved diabetic macular edema was present in 7 eyes (11%) and 9 eyes (14%) at the 12-month visit (P 0.79), respectively. No differences in visual acuity outcomes were identified. One study participant developed a corneal melt after using nepafenac in the nonstudy eye, which had a history of severe dry eye. No additional safety concerns were evident. Conclusion: In eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema and good visual acuity, topical nepafenac 0.1% 3 times daily for 1 year likely does not have a meaningful effect on optical coherence tomography-measured retinal thickness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)944-956
Number of pages13
JournalRetina
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 8 2015

Keywords

  • Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
  • nepafenac
  • noncentral DME
  • topical NSAID

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Topical nepafenec in eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this