Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture

Charles L. Folk, Andrew B. Leber, Howard E Egeth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that spatial attention can be "captured" by irrelevant events, but only if the eliciting stimulus matches top-down attentional control settings. Here we explore whether similar principles hold for nonspatial attentional selection. Subjects searched for a coloured target letter embedded in an RSVP stream of letters inside a box centred on fixation. On critical trials, a distractor, consisting of a brief change in the colour of the box, occurred at various temporal lags prior to the target. In Experiment 1, the distractor produced a decrement in target detection, but only when it matched the target colour. Experiments 2 and 3 provide evidence that this effect does not reflect masking or the dispersion of spatial attention. The results establish that (1) nonspatial selection is subject to "capture", (2) such capture is contingent on top-down attentional control settings, and (3) control settings for nonspatial capture can vary in specificity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)616-642
Number of pages27
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Attentional Blink
Color
Patient Selection
Contingent
Top-down

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Top-down control settings and the attentional blink : Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture. / Folk, Charles L.; Leber, Andrew B.; Egeth, Howard E.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 16, No. 5, 07.2008, p. 616-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22b3c125c0224b6e928314005def768d,
title = "Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture",
abstract = "Previous studies have shown that spatial attention can be {"}captured{"} by irrelevant events, but only if the eliciting stimulus matches top-down attentional control settings. Here we explore whether similar principles hold for nonspatial attentional selection. Subjects searched for a coloured target letter embedded in an RSVP stream of letters inside a box centred on fixation. On critical trials, a distractor, consisting of a brief change in the colour of the box, occurred at various temporal lags prior to the target. In Experiment 1, the distractor produced a decrement in target detection, but only when it matched the target colour. Experiments 2 and 3 provide evidence that this effect does not reflect masking or the dispersion of spatial attention. The results establish that (1) nonspatial selection is subject to {"}capture{"}, (2) such capture is contingent on top-down attentional control settings, and (3) control settings for nonspatial capture can vary in specificity.",
author = "Folk, {Charles L.} and Leber, {Andrew B.} and Egeth, {Howard E}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/13506280601134018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "616--642",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Top-down control settings and the attentional blink

T2 - Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture

AU - Folk, Charles L.

AU - Leber, Andrew B.

AU - Egeth, Howard E

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Previous studies have shown that spatial attention can be "captured" by irrelevant events, but only if the eliciting stimulus matches top-down attentional control settings. Here we explore whether similar principles hold for nonspatial attentional selection. Subjects searched for a coloured target letter embedded in an RSVP stream of letters inside a box centred on fixation. On critical trials, a distractor, consisting of a brief change in the colour of the box, occurred at various temporal lags prior to the target. In Experiment 1, the distractor produced a decrement in target detection, but only when it matched the target colour. Experiments 2 and 3 provide evidence that this effect does not reflect masking or the dispersion of spatial attention. The results establish that (1) nonspatial selection is subject to "capture", (2) such capture is contingent on top-down attentional control settings, and (3) control settings for nonspatial capture can vary in specificity.

AB - Previous studies have shown that spatial attention can be "captured" by irrelevant events, but only if the eliciting stimulus matches top-down attentional control settings. Here we explore whether similar principles hold for nonspatial attentional selection. Subjects searched for a coloured target letter embedded in an RSVP stream of letters inside a box centred on fixation. On critical trials, a distractor, consisting of a brief change in the colour of the box, occurred at various temporal lags prior to the target. In Experiment 1, the distractor produced a decrement in target detection, but only when it matched the target colour. Experiments 2 and 3 provide evidence that this effect does not reflect masking or the dispersion of spatial attention. The results establish that (1) nonspatial selection is subject to "capture", (2) such capture is contingent on top-down attentional control settings, and (3) control settings for nonspatial capture can vary in specificity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46949110321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46949110321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13506280601134018

DO - 10.1080/13506280601134018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:46949110321

VL - 16

SP - 616

EP - 642

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 5

ER -