Too few radiologists?

Mythreyi Bhargavan, Jonathan H. Sunshine, Barbara Schepps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to model the supply and demand for diagnostic radiologists over the next 30 years under alternative scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We used responses from the American College of Radiology's 2000 Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists and Radiation Oncologists to determine the current age distribution and activity of diagnostic radiologists. The numbers entering the profession were projected using three assumptions: no change in training programs, reduction of residency to 3 years (or otherwise increasing the annual number of graduates by one third), and elimination of most fellowship programs. Demand projections assume a 5% shortage in 2001 and depend on growth rates of the population, aging, scenarios of growth of age-standardized demand, and the effect of possibly productivity-enhancing technologies such as PACS (picture archiving and communication systems). RESULTS. Only a one-third increase in annual graduates materially increases the work-force relative to current training patterns. In all cases, the growth rate of the demand for radiologists far outstrips the supply over a 30-year horizon. In the shorter term, projections of current trends point to an increasing shortage, but rapid major productivity increases could produce a surplus. CONCLUSION. Those in the field of diagnostic radiology should consider measures to mitigate the increasing shortage, while monitoring developments that might signal departures from current trends in supply and demand.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1075-1082
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume178
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiology
Radiology Information Systems
Population Growth
Age Distribution
Internship and Residency
Growth
Technology
Education
Radiologists
Radiation Oncologists
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Bhargavan, M., Sunshine, J. H., & Schepps, B. (2002). Too few radiologists? American Journal of Roentgenology, 178(5), 1075-1082.

Too few radiologists? / Bhargavan, Mythreyi; Sunshine, Jonathan H.; Schepps, Barbara.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 178, No. 5, 2002, p. 1075-1082.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bhargavan, M, Sunshine, JH & Schepps, B 2002, 'Too few radiologists?', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1075-1082.
Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Schepps B. Too few radiologists? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;178(5):1075-1082.
Bhargavan, Mythreyi ; Sunshine, Jonathan H. ; Schepps, Barbara. / Too few radiologists?. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002 ; Vol. 178, No. 5. pp. 1075-1082.
@article{0d0b1546e83b4d56aa360795c5b2e41a,
title = "Too few radiologists?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to model the supply and demand for diagnostic radiologists over the next 30 years under alternative scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We used responses from the American College of Radiology's 2000 Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists and Radiation Oncologists to determine the current age distribution and activity of diagnostic radiologists. The numbers entering the profession were projected using three assumptions: no change in training programs, reduction of residency to 3 years (or otherwise increasing the annual number of graduates by one third), and elimination of most fellowship programs. Demand projections assume a 5{\%} shortage in 2001 and depend on growth rates of the population, aging, scenarios of growth of age-standardized demand, and the effect of possibly productivity-enhancing technologies such as PACS (picture archiving and communication systems). RESULTS. Only a one-third increase in annual graduates materially increases the work-force relative to current training patterns. In all cases, the growth rate of the demand for radiologists far outstrips the supply over a 30-year horizon. In the shorter term, projections of current trends point to an increasing shortage, but rapid major productivity increases could produce a surplus. CONCLUSION. Those in the field of diagnostic radiology should consider measures to mitigate the increasing shortage, while monitoring developments that might signal departures from current trends in supply and demand.",
author = "Mythreyi Bhargavan and Sunshine, {Jonathan H.} and Barbara Schepps",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "178",
pages = "1075--1082",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too few radiologists?

AU - Bhargavan, Mythreyi

AU - Sunshine, Jonathan H.

AU - Schepps, Barbara

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to model the supply and demand for diagnostic radiologists over the next 30 years under alternative scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We used responses from the American College of Radiology's 2000 Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists and Radiation Oncologists to determine the current age distribution and activity of diagnostic radiologists. The numbers entering the profession were projected using three assumptions: no change in training programs, reduction of residency to 3 years (or otherwise increasing the annual number of graduates by one third), and elimination of most fellowship programs. Demand projections assume a 5% shortage in 2001 and depend on growth rates of the population, aging, scenarios of growth of age-standardized demand, and the effect of possibly productivity-enhancing technologies such as PACS (picture archiving and communication systems). RESULTS. Only a one-third increase in annual graduates materially increases the work-force relative to current training patterns. In all cases, the growth rate of the demand for radiologists far outstrips the supply over a 30-year horizon. In the shorter term, projections of current trends point to an increasing shortage, but rapid major productivity increases could produce a surplus. CONCLUSION. Those in the field of diagnostic radiology should consider measures to mitigate the increasing shortage, while monitoring developments that might signal departures from current trends in supply and demand.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to model the supply and demand for diagnostic radiologists over the next 30 years under alternative scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We used responses from the American College of Radiology's 2000 Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists and Radiation Oncologists to determine the current age distribution and activity of diagnostic radiologists. The numbers entering the profession were projected using three assumptions: no change in training programs, reduction of residency to 3 years (or otherwise increasing the annual number of graduates by one third), and elimination of most fellowship programs. Demand projections assume a 5% shortage in 2001 and depend on growth rates of the population, aging, scenarios of growth of age-standardized demand, and the effect of possibly productivity-enhancing technologies such as PACS (picture archiving and communication systems). RESULTS. Only a one-third increase in annual graduates materially increases the work-force relative to current training patterns. In all cases, the growth rate of the demand for radiologists far outstrips the supply over a 30-year horizon. In the shorter term, projections of current trends point to an increasing shortage, but rapid major productivity increases could produce a surplus. CONCLUSION. Those in the field of diagnostic radiology should consider measures to mitigate the increasing shortage, while monitoring developments that might signal departures from current trends in supply and demand.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036112217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036112217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 178

SP - 1075

EP - 1082

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 5

ER -