Time to pull the trigger? Examining the ethical permissibility of minimum age restrictions for gun ownership and use

Stephanie R. Morain, Cassandra Crifasi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A series of prominent mass shootings in the United States (US) has prompted renewed interest in revising gun policy. One proposal that has gained political traction is raising the minimum age for purchase and possession of guns to 21. While some commentators have suggested that the public mood may be shifting on gun policy, proposals to raise the minimum age have nevertheless provoked controversy. In this manuscript, we examine the ethical acceptability of raising the minimum age of purchase and possession of guns to 21. First, we examine the nature of the rights claim at issue. Second, we examine liberty-based objections to minimum age laws, and offer counter-arguments to these claims. Then, we examine the nature of the harm to be prevented via minimum age laws. We conclude that gun ownership is an important right, but one that nevertheless is ethical to regulate. We argue that liberty-based objections to minimum age laws are not as strong as critics of these laws claim. While we acknowledge the data limitations on assessing their likely success in reducing gun-related harms, we argue that minimum age laws are an ethically permissible policy strategy. We conclude with several recommendations for further research and policy responses to addressing the toll of gun-related morbidity and mortality.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages205-209
Number of pages5
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume118
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ownership
Policy Making
Firearms
Wounds and Injuries
Traction
Morbidity
Mortality
Research

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Firearms/legislation & jurisprudence
  • Gunshot/prevention & control
  • Policy making
  • United States
  • Wounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Time to pull the trigger? Examining the ethical permissibility of minimum age restrictions for gun ownership and use. / Morain, Stephanie R.; Crifasi, Cassandra.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 118, 01.01.2019, p. 205-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93044370215a49a99dea299185b7e395,
title = "Time to pull the trigger? Examining the ethical permissibility of minimum age restrictions for gun ownership and use",
abstract = "A series of prominent mass shootings in the United States (US) has prompted renewed interest in revising gun policy. One proposal that has gained political traction is raising the minimum age for purchase and possession of guns to 21. While some commentators have suggested that the public mood may be shifting on gun policy, proposals to raise the minimum age have nevertheless provoked controversy. In this manuscript, we examine the ethical acceptability of raising the minimum age of purchase and possession of guns to 21. First, we examine the nature of the rights claim at issue. Second, we examine liberty-based objections to minimum age laws, and offer counter-arguments to these claims. Then, we examine the nature of the harm to be prevented via minimum age laws. We conclude that gun ownership is an important right, but one that nevertheless is ethical to regulate. We argue that liberty-based objections to minimum age laws are not as strong as critics of these laws claim. While we acknowledge the data limitations on assessing their likely success in reducing gun-related harms, we argue that minimum age laws are an ethically permissible policy strategy. We conclude with several recommendations for further research and policy responses to addressing the toll of gun-related morbidity and mortality.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Firearms/legislation & jurisprudence, Gunshot/prevention & control, Policy making, United States, Wounds",
author = "Morain, {Stephanie R.} and Cassandra Crifasi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "205--209",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to pull the trigger? Examining the ethical permissibility of minimum age restrictions for gun ownership and use

AU - Morain, Stephanie R.

AU - Crifasi, Cassandra

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - A series of prominent mass shootings in the United States (US) has prompted renewed interest in revising gun policy. One proposal that has gained political traction is raising the minimum age for purchase and possession of guns to 21. While some commentators have suggested that the public mood may be shifting on gun policy, proposals to raise the minimum age have nevertheless provoked controversy. In this manuscript, we examine the ethical acceptability of raising the minimum age of purchase and possession of guns to 21. First, we examine the nature of the rights claim at issue. Second, we examine liberty-based objections to minimum age laws, and offer counter-arguments to these claims. Then, we examine the nature of the harm to be prevented via minimum age laws. We conclude that gun ownership is an important right, but one that nevertheless is ethical to regulate. We argue that liberty-based objections to minimum age laws are not as strong as critics of these laws claim. While we acknowledge the data limitations on assessing their likely success in reducing gun-related harms, we argue that minimum age laws are an ethically permissible policy strategy. We conclude with several recommendations for further research and policy responses to addressing the toll of gun-related morbidity and mortality.

AB - A series of prominent mass shootings in the United States (US) has prompted renewed interest in revising gun policy. One proposal that has gained political traction is raising the minimum age for purchase and possession of guns to 21. While some commentators have suggested that the public mood may be shifting on gun policy, proposals to raise the minimum age have nevertheless provoked controversy. In this manuscript, we examine the ethical acceptability of raising the minimum age of purchase and possession of guns to 21. First, we examine the nature of the rights claim at issue. Second, we examine liberty-based objections to minimum age laws, and offer counter-arguments to these claims. Then, we examine the nature of the harm to be prevented via minimum age laws. We conclude that gun ownership is an important right, but one that nevertheless is ethical to regulate. We argue that liberty-based objections to minimum age laws are not as strong as critics of these laws claim. While we acknowledge the data limitations on assessing their likely success in reducing gun-related harms, we argue that minimum age laws are an ethically permissible policy strategy. We conclude with several recommendations for further research and policy responses to addressing the toll of gun-related morbidity and mortality.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Firearms/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Gunshot/prevention & control

KW - Policy making

KW - United States

KW - Wounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056187646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056187646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 205

EP - 209

JO - Preventive Medicine

T2 - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

ER -