Three-dimensional US of the prostate

Early experience

Ulrike Maria Hamper, Victoria Trapanotto, M. Robert DeJong, Sheila Sheth, Cynthia I. Caskey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using a three-dimensional (3D) endorectal transducer at ultrasonography (US) in the prostate gland in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent 3D imaging of the prostate gland with a 3D endorectal probe following conventional two-dimensional (2D) US and prior to prostatic biopsy. Image acquisition was performed as a volume of data with nearly immediate reconstruction and simultaneous display of sectional anatomy in three orthogonal planes - sagittal plane, transverse or coronal plane, or any arbitrary oblique plane. Images were evaluated for presence of focal lesions, glandular volume, visualization of lateral and anterior portions of the gland, and extraglandular extension of tumor. RESULTS: Three-dimensional US allowed better visualization of the gland and focal lesions, especially on the coronally reconstructed images, which were judged superior to the sagittally or transversely reconstructed images for interpretation in 50% of the patients. Prostatic volumes obtained from 3D US were consistently smaller than volumes obtained from 2D US (20% difference, P = .006). Three- dimensional US was superior to 2D US in depicting tumor presence (nine of 10 right hemispheres, three of eight left hemispheres) and extraglandular extent of disease (three of five hemispheres). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional endorectal prostatic US appears to be clinically feasible and easy to perform. Added anatomic information from the coronal plane may allow better depiction of tumors and extraglandular spread than is possible with current 2D techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)719-723
Number of pages5
JournalRadiology
Volume212
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1999

Fingerprint

Prostate
Ultrasonography
Cross-Sectional Anatomy
Neoplasms
Transducers
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Prostate, neoplasms
  • Prostate, US
  • Ultrasound (US), technology
  • Ultrasound (US), three-dimensional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Hamper, U. M., Trapanotto, V., DeJong, M. R., Sheth, S., & Caskey, C. I. (1999). Three-dimensional US of the prostate: Early experience. Radiology, 212(3), 719-723.

Three-dimensional US of the prostate : Early experience. / Hamper, Ulrike Maria; Trapanotto, Victoria; DeJong, M. Robert; Sheth, Sheila; Caskey, Cynthia I.

In: Radiology, Vol. 212, No. 3, 09.1999, p. 719-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hamper, UM, Trapanotto, V, DeJong, MR, Sheth, S & Caskey, CI 1999, 'Three-dimensional US of the prostate: Early experience', Radiology, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 719-723.
Hamper UM, Trapanotto V, DeJong MR, Sheth S, Caskey CI. Three-dimensional US of the prostate: Early experience. Radiology. 1999 Sep;212(3):719-723.
Hamper, Ulrike Maria ; Trapanotto, Victoria ; DeJong, M. Robert ; Sheth, Sheila ; Caskey, Cynthia I. / Three-dimensional US of the prostate : Early experience. In: Radiology. 1999 ; Vol. 212, No. 3. pp. 719-723.
@article{b04f383df61e4f69bb2d44b40967a332,
title = "Three-dimensional US of the prostate: Early experience",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using a three-dimensional (3D) endorectal transducer at ultrasonography (US) in the prostate gland in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent 3D imaging of the prostate gland with a 3D endorectal probe following conventional two-dimensional (2D) US and prior to prostatic biopsy. Image acquisition was performed as a volume of data with nearly immediate reconstruction and simultaneous display of sectional anatomy in three orthogonal planes - sagittal plane, transverse or coronal plane, or any arbitrary oblique plane. Images were evaluated for presence of focal lesions, glandular volume, visualization of lateral and anterior portions of the gland, and extraglandular extension of tumor. RESULTS: Three-dimensional US allowed better visualization of the gland and focal lesions, especially on the coronally reconstructed images, which were judged superior to the sagittally or transversely reconstructed images for interpretation in 50{\%} of the patients. Prostatic volumes obtained from 3D US were consistently smaller than volumes obtained from 2D US (20{\%} difference, P = .006). Three- dimensional US was superior to 2D US in depicting tumor presence (nine of 10 right hemispheres, three of eight left hemispheres) and extraglandular extent of disease (three of five hemispheres). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional endorectal prostatic US appears to be clinically feasible and easy to perform. Added anatomic information from the coronal plane may allow better depiction of tumors and extraglandular spread than is possible with current 2D techniques.",
keywords = "Prostate, neoplasms, Prostate, US, Ultrasound (US), technology, Ultrasound (US), three-dimensional",
author = "Hamper, {Ulrike Maria} and Victoria Trapanotto and DeJong, {M. Robert} and Sheila Sheth and Caskey, {Cynthia I.}",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "212",
pages = "719--723",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional US of the prostate

T2 - Early experience

AU - Hamper, Ulrike Maria

AU - Trapanotto, Victoria

AU - DeJong, M. Robert

AU - Sheth, Sheila

AU - Caskey, Cynthia I.

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using a three-dimensional (3D) endorectal transducer at ultrasonography (US) in the prostate gland in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent 3D imaging of the prostate gland with a 3D endorectal probe following conventional two-dimensional (2D) US and prior to prostatic biopsy. Image acquisition was performed as a volume of data with nearly immediate reconstruction and simultaneous display of sectional anatomy in three orthogonal planes - sagittal plane, transverse or coronal plane, or any arbitrary oblique plane. Images were evaluated for presence of focal lesions, glandular volume, visualization of lateral and anterior portions of the gland, and extraglandular extension of tumor. RESULTS: Three-dimensional US allowed better visualization of the gland and focal lesions, especially on the coronally reconstructed images, which were judged superior to the sagittally or transversely reconstructed images for interpretation in 50% of the patients. Prostatic volumes obtained from 3D US were consistently smaller than volumes obtained from 2D US (20% difference, P = .006). Three- dimensional US was superior to 2D US in depicting tumor presence (nine of 10 right hemispheres, three of eight left hemispheres) and extraglandular extent of disease (three of five hemispheres). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional endorectal prostatic US appears to be clinically feasible and easy to perform. Added anatomic information from the coronal plane may allow better depiction of tumors and extraglandular spread than is possible with current 2D techniques.

AB - PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using a three-dimensional (3D) endorectal transducer at ultrasonography (US) in the prostate gland in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent 3D imaging of the prostate gland with a 3D endorectal probe following conventional two-dimensional (2D) US and prior to prostatic biopsy. Image acquisition was performed as a volume of data with nearly immediate reconstruction and simultaneous display of sectional anatomy in three orthogonal planes - sagittal plane, transverse or coronal plane, or any arbitrary oblique plane. Images were evaluated for presence of focal lesions, glandular volume, visualization of lateral and anterior portions of the gland, and extraglandular extension of tumor. RESULTS: Three-dimensional US allowed better visualization of the gland and focal lesions, especially on the coronally reconstructed images, which were judged superior to the sagittally or transversely reconstructed images for interpretation in 50% of the patients. Prostatic volumes obtained from 3D US were consistently smaller than volumes obtained from 2D US (20% difference, P = .006). Three- dimensional US was superior to 2D US in depicting tumor presence (nine of 10 right hemispheres, three of eight left hemispheres) and extraglandular extent of disease (three of five hemispheres). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional endorectal prostatic US appears to be clinically feasible and easy to perform. Added anatomic information from the coronal plane may allow better depiction of tumors and extraglandular spread than is possible with current 2D techniques.

KW - Prostate, neoplasms

KW - Prostate, US

KW - Ultrasound (US), technology

KW - Ultrasound (US), three-dimensional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032826716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032826716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 212

SP - 719

EP - 723

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -