Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations: Defining high-risk clinical clusters

Emily F. Hamilton, Samuel Smith, Lin Yang, Philip Warrick, Antonio Ciampi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Statistical methods that measure the independent contribution of individual factors for third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration (TFPL) fall short when the clinician is faced with a combination of factors. Our objective was to demonstrate how a statistical technique, classification and regression trees (CART), can identify high-risk clinical clusters. Study Design: We performed multivariable logistic regression, and CART analysis on data from 25,150 term vaginal births. Results: Multivariable analyses found strong associations with the use of episiotomy, forceps, vacuum, nulliparity, and birthweight. CART ranked episiotomy, operative delivery, and birthweight as the more discriminating factors and defined distinct risk groups with TFPL rates that ranged from 0-100%. For example, without episiotomy, the rate of TFPL was 2.2%. In the presence of an episiotomy, forceps, and birthweight of >3634 g, the rate of TFPL was 68.9%. Conclusion: CART showed that certain combinations held low risk, where as other combinations carried extreme risk, which clarified how choices on delivery options can markedly affect the rate of TFPL for specific mothers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309.e1-309.e6
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume204
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lacerations
Episiotomy
Surgical Instruments
Term Birth
Vacuum
Parity
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • classification and regression
  • episiotomy
  • perineal laceration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations : Defining high-risk clinical clusters. / Hamilton, Emily F.; Smith, Samuel; Yang, Lin; Warrick, Philip; Ciampi, Antonio.

In: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, Vol. 204, No. 4, 01.01.2011, p. 309.e1-309.e6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hamilton, Emily F. ; Smith, Samuel ; Yang, Lin ; Warrick, Philip ; Ciampi, Antonio. / Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations : Defining high-risk clinical clusters. In: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2011 ; Vol. 204, No. 4. pp. 309.e1-309.e6.
@article{0d2b65f31ae24140a79b2601920851cc,
title = "Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations: Defining high-risk clinical clusters",
abstract = "Objective: Statistical methods that measure the independent contribution of individual factors for third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration (TFPL) fall short when the clinician is faced with a combination of factors. Our objective was to demonstrate how a statistical technique, classification and regression trees (CART), can identify high-risk clinical clusters. Study Design: We performed multivariable logistic regression, and CART analysis on data from 25,150 term vaginal births. Results: Multivariable analyses found strong associations with the use of episiotomy, forceps, vacuum, nulliparity, and birthweight. CART ranked episiotomy, operative delivery, and birthweight as the more discriminating factors and defined distinct risk groups with TFPL rates that ranged from 0-100{\%}. For example, without episiotomy, the rate of TFPL was 2.2{\%}. In the presence of an episiotomy, forceps, and birthweight of >3634 g, the rate of TFPL was 68.9{\%}. Conclusion: CART showed that certain combinations held low risk, where as other combinations carried extreme risk, which clarified how choices on delivery options can markedly affect the rate of TFPL for specific mothers.",
keywords = "classification and regression, episiotomy, perineal laceration",
author = "Hamilton, {Emily F.} and Samuel Smith and Lin Yang and Philip Warrick and Antonio Ciampi",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "204",
pages = "309.e1--309.e6",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations

T2 - Defining high-risk clinical clusters

AU - Hamilton, Emily F.

AU - Smith, Samuel

AU - Yang, Lin

AU - Warrick, Philip

AU - Ciampi, Antonio

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Objective: Statistical methods that measure the independent contribution of individual factors for third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration (TFPL) fall short when the clinician is faced with a combination of factors. Our objective was to demonstrate how a statistical technique, classification and regression trees (CART), can identify high-risk clinical clusters. Study Design: We performed multivariable logistic regression, and CART analysis on data from 25,150 term vaginal births. Results: Multivariable analyses found strong associations with the use of episiotomy, forceps, vacuum, nulliparity, and birthweight. CART ranked episiotomy, operative delivery, and birthweight as the more discriminating factors and defined distinct risk groups with TFPL rates that ranged from 0-100%. For example, without episiotomy, the rate of TFPL was 2.2%. In the presence of an episiotomy, forceps, and birthweight of >3634 g, the rate of TFPL was 68.9%. Conclusion: CART showed that certain combinations held low risk, where as other combinations carried extreme risk, which clarified how choices on delivery options can markedly affect the rate of TFPL for specific mothers.

AB - Objective: Statistical methods that measure the independent contribution of individual factors for third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration (TFPL) fall short when the clinician is faced with a combination of factors. Our objective was to demonstrate how a statistical technique, classification and regression trees (CART), can identify high-risk clinical clusters. Study Design: We performed multivariable logistic regression, and CART analysis on data from 25,150 term vaginal births. Results: Multivariable analyses found strong associations with the use of episiotomy, forceps, vacuum, nulliparity, and birthweight. CART ranked episiotomy, operative delivery, and birthweight as the more discriminating factors and defined distinct risk groups with TFPL rates that ranged from 0-100%. For example, without episiotomy, the rate of TFPL was 2.2%. In the presence of an episiotomy, forceps, and birthweight of >3634 g, the rate of TFPL was 68.9%. Conclusion: CART showed that certain combinations held low risk, where as other combinations carried extreme risk, which clarified how choices on delivery options can markedly affect the rate of TFPL for specific mothers.

KW - classification and regression

KW - episiotomy

KW - perineal laceration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953277301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953277301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.048

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.048

M3 - Article

C2 - 21349493

AN - SCOPUS:79953277301

VL - 204

SP - 309.e1-309.e6

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 4

ER -