The value of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. Results of a survey

John J L Yap, Leigh Ann Curl, Ronald S. Kvitne, Edward G McFarland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One hundred twelve practicing members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding use of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. They were also asked about treatment for hypothetical patients seen in the emergency department or office with grade II or III acromioclavicular separations. One hundred five physicians (94%) responded to the survey. Eighty-five members (81%) did not recommend obtaining weighted views in the emergency department. Sixty members (57%) did not use weighted views, and the majority commented that weighted views had no influence on their decision-making regarding treatment. Forty- five members (43%) used weighted views, but most did not use the results of this test to determine surgical intervention. Physicians recommending weighted views averaged 21 years of practice, compared with 16 years for those who did not obtain weighted views. Only nine physicians (9%) had changed treatment on the basis of weighted views. The patient's arm dominance, work, or athletic status did not influence most surgeons' decision to perform surgery when weighted views revealed a grade III separation. We found no correlation between obtaining weighted views and performing surgical reconstruction for patients with grade III acromioclavicular separations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)806-809
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume27
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Acromioclavicular Joint
Physicians
Hospital Emergency Service
Elbow
Canada
Sports
Decision Making
Arm
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

The value of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. Results of a survey. / Yap, John J L; Curl, Leigh Ann; Kvitne, Ronald S.; McFarland, Edward G.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 6, 1999, p. 806-809.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yap, John J L ; Curl, Leigh Ann ; Kvitne, Ronald S. ; McFarland, Edward G. / The value of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. Results of a survey. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 806-809.
@article{d88258c8879a4792932ba00fda217320,
title = "The value of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. Results of a survey",
abstract = "One hundred twelve practicing members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding use of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. They were also asked about treatment for hypothetical patients seen in the emergency department or office with grade II or III acromioclavicular separations. One hundred five physicians (94{\%}) responded to the survey. Eighty-five members (81{\%}) did not recommend obtaining weighted views in the emergency department. Sixty members (57{\%}) did not use weighted views, and the majority commented that weighted views had no influence on their decision-making regarding treatment. Forty- five members (43{\%}) used weighted views, but most did not use the results of this test to determine surgical intervention. Physicians recommending weighted views averaged 21 years of practice, compared with 16 years for those who did not obtain weighted views. Only nine physicians (9{\%}) had changed treatment on the basis of weighted views. The patient's arm dominance, work, or athletic status did not influence most surgeons' decision to perform surgery when weighted views revealed a grade III separation. We found no correlation between obtaining weighted views and performing surgical reconstruction for patients with grade III acromioclavicular separations.",
author = "Yap, {John J L} and Curl, {Leigh Ann} and Kvitne, {Ronald S.} and McFarland, {Edward G}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "806--809",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. Results of a survey

AU - Yap, John J L

AU - Curl, Leigh Ann

AU - Kvitne, Ronald S.

AU - McFarland, Edward G

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - One hundred twelve practicing members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding use of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. They were also asked about treatment for hypothetical patients seen in the emergency department or office with grade II or III acromioclavicular separations. One hundred five physicians (94%) responded to the survey. Eighty-five members (81%) did not recommend obtaining weighted views in the emergency department. Sixty members (57%) did not use weighted views, and the majority commented that weighted views had no influence on their decision-making regarding treatment. Forty- five members (43%) used weighted views, but most did not use the results of this test to determine surgical intervention. Physicians recommending weighted views averaged 21 years of practice, compared with 16 years for those who did not obtain weighted views. Only nine physicians (9%) had changed treatment on the basis of weighted views. The patient's arm dominance, work, or athletic status did not influence most surgeons' decision to perform surgery when weighted views revealed a grade III separation. We found no correlation between obtaining weighted views and performing surgical reconstruction for patients with grade III acromioclavicular separations.

AB - One hundred twelve practicing members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding use of weighted views of the acromioclavicular joint. They were also asked about treatment for hypothetical patients seen in the emergency department or office with grade II or III acromioclavicular separations. One hundred five physicians (94%) responded to the survey. Eighty-five members (81%) did not recommend obtaining weighted views in the emergency department. Sixty members (57%) did not use weighted views, and the majority commented that weighted views had no influence on their decision-making regarding treatment. Forty- five members (43%) used weighted views, but most did not use the results of this test to determine surgical intervention. Physicians recommending weighted views averaged 21 years of practice, compared with 16 years for those who did not obtain weighted views. Only nine physicians (9%) had changed treatment on the basis of weighted views. The patient's arm dominance, work, or athletic status did not influence most surgeons' decision to perform surgery when weighted views revealed a grade III separation. We found no correlation between obtaining weighted views and performing surgical reconstruction for patients with grade III acromioclavicular separations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032727744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032727744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10569370

AN - SCOPUS:0032727744

VL - 27

SP - 806

EP - 809

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 6

ER -