TY - JOUR
T1 - The Value of U.S. Pharmacopeial Standards
T2 - A Review of the Literature
AU - Heyward, James
AU - Padula, William
AU - Tierce, Jonothan C.
AU - Alexander, G. Caleb
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by a grant from U.S. Pharmacopeia and performed by Monument Analytics. The funding source participated in the design and conduct of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Pharmacists Association®
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - While there are many standard-setting health care organizations, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention's (USP) role includes the creation of documentary and physical standards for therapeutics, including chemical drugs, excipients, and biologics. Despite the ubiquity of these standards, little work has been carried out to characterize and quantify their value. We reviewed the peer-reviewed and gray literature relevant to such evaluations. The review yielded 36 articles, focused variously on accreditation and other standards in health care, the broad impact of pharmacopeial standards and evaluations of specific USP standards. We did not find any study quantifying the impact of USP or other pharmacopeial standards, but many reports have been published that suggest the utility of USP standards to drug development, quality assurance, and public health. Frequently cited areas of impact include equitably advancing the analytical capabilities of manufacturers; enabling the creation of legally enforceable naming conventions; detecting mislabeled and substandard drugs in the marketplace, especially in the context of increased globalization of drug markets; and facilitating the harmonization of diverse international drug quality standards. Our insights provide opportunities for empiric assessments of the effects of USP standards on important outcomes including their promotion of efficient drug development, market competition, drug quality, and patient safety.
AB - While there are many standard-setting health care organizations, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention's (USP) role includes the creation of documentary and physical standards for therapeutics, including chemical drugs, excipients, and biologics. Despite the ubiquity of these standards, little work has been carried out to characterize and quantify their value. We reviewed the peer-reviewed and gray literature relevant to such evaluations. The review yielded 36 articles, focused variously on accreditation and other standards in health care, the broad impact of pharmacopeial standards and evaluations of specific USP standards. We did not find any study quantifying the impact of USP or other pharmacopeial standards, but many reports have been published that suggest the utility of USP standards to drug development, quality assurance, and public health. Frequently cited areas of impact include equitably advancing the analytical capabilities of manufacturers; enabling the creation of legally enforceable naming conventions; detecting mislabeled and substandard drugs in the marketplace, especially in the context of increased globalization of drug markets; and facilitating the harmonization of diverse international drug quality standards. Our insights provide opportunities for empiric assessments of the effects of USP standards on important outcomes including their promotion of efficient drug development, market competition, drug quality, and patient safety.
KW - US Pharmacopeia (USP)
KW - content uniformity
KW - drug standards
KW - excipient(s)
KW - physical characterization
KW - standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050158239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050158239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 29908148
AN - SCOPUS:85050158239
SN - 0022-3549
VL - 107
SP - 2611
EP - 2617
JO - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
JF - Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
IS - 10
ER -