The value of linking hospital discharge and mortality data for comparative effectiveness research

Tami L. Mark, William Lawrence, Rosanna M. Coffey, Timothy Kenney, Bong Chul Chu, Emile R. Mohler, Claudia Angelica Steiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Linkage of US state hospital discharge records to state death certificate records offers the possibility of tracking long-term mortality outcomes across large, diverse patient populations, which may be useful for comparative effective analyses. Aim: To demonstrate the value of linking state community hospital discharge data to vital statistics death files for research by conducting a comparative effectiveness analysis. Methods: Linked Patient Discharge Data and Vital Statistics Death Files from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development were used to compare survival rates for patients with an elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm who received open aneurysm repair (OAR) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The sample consisted of 13,652 hospitalized patients who underwent an OAR or EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1 July 2000 and 31 January 2006. Patients were matched using propensity scores (8966 patients in the matched sample). In-hospital, 30-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality rates were compared between the OAR and EVAR populations, before and after propensity score matching. Results: We found a few data anomalies (92 out of 13,652), primarily in patients' sex and date of death. The analysis revealed that in the matched cohort, in-hospital and 30-day postdischarge mortality rates were significantly lower following EVAR than OAR; however, consistent with previous clinical trials, differences in the 1-and 5-year rates were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that linked US state discharge and mortality data can be a valuable resource for comparative effectiveness analyses. In particular, this approach may be useful when generally available data sets such as Medicare claims data limit the generalizability of findings. Policy-makers and others should consider greater investments in these data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-184
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Comparative Effectiveness Research
Hospital Mortality
Aneurysm
Vital Statistics
Propensity Score
State Hospitals
Death Certificates
Mortality
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Health Planning
Hospital Records
Patient Discharge
Community Hospital
Medicare
Administrative Personnel
Population
Survival Rate
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • comparative effectiveness
  • linked data
  • observational data analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Mark, T. L., Lawrence, W., Coffey, R. M., Kenney, T., Chu, B. C., Mohler, E. R., & Steiner, C. A. (2013). The value of linking hospital discharge and mortality data for comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.13.4

The value of linking hospital discharge and mortality data for comparative effectiveness research. / Mark, Tami L.; Lawrence, William; Coffey, Rosanna M.; Kenney, Timothy; Chu, Bong Chul; Mohler, Emile R.; Steiner, Claudia Angelica.

In: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2013, p. 175-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mark, TL, Lawrence, W, Coffey, RM, Kenney, T, Chu, BC, Mohler, ER & Steiner, CA 2013, 'The value of linking hospital discharge and mortality data for comparative effectiveness research', Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 175-184. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.13.4
Mark, Tami L. ; Lawrence, William ; Coffey, Rosanna M. ; Kenney, Timothy ; Chu, Bong Chul ; Mohler, Emile R. ; Steiner, Claudia Angelica. / The value of linking hospital discharge and mortality data for comparative effectiveness research. In: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2013 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 175-184.
@article{8bd6c94fbf3f4b419d59523887a75c85,
title = "The value of linking hospital discharge and mortality data for comparative effectiveness research",
abstract = "Background: Linkage of US state hospital discharge records to state death certificate records offers the possibility of tracking long-term mortality outcomes across large, diverse patient populations, which may be useful for comparative effective analyses. Aim: To demonstrate the value of linking state community hospital discharge data to vital statistics death files for research by conducting a comparative effectiveness analysis. Methods: Linked Patient Discharge Data and Vital Statistics Death Files from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development were used to compare survival rates for patients with an elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm who received open aneurysm repair (OAR) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The sample consisted of 13,652 hospitalized patients who underwent an OAR or EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1 July 2000 and 31 January 2006. Patients were matched using propensity scores (8966 patients in the matched sample). In-hospital, 30-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality rates were compared between the OAR and EVAR populations, before and after propensity score matching. Results: We found a few data anomalies (92 out of 13,652), primarily in patients' sex and date of death. The analysis revealed that in the matched cohort, in-hospital and 30-day postdischarge mortality rates were significantly lower following EVAR than OAR; however, consistent with previous clinical trials, differences in the 1-and 5-year rates were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that linked US state discharge and mortality data can be a valuable resource for comparative effectiveness analyses. In particular, this approach may be useful when generally available data sets such as Medicare claims data limit the generalizability of findings. Policy-makers and others should consider greater investments in these data.",
keywords = "abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparative effectiveness, linked data, observational data analysis",
author = "Mark, {Tami L.} and William Lawrence and Coffey, {Rosanna M.} and Timothy Kenney and Chu, {Bong Chul} and Mohler, {Emile R.} and Steiner, {Claudia Angelica}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.2217/cer.13.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "175--184",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research",
issn = "2042-6305",
publisher = "Future Medicine Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of linking hospital discharge and mortality data for comparative effectiveness research

AU - Mark, Tami L.

AU - Lawrence, William

AU - Coffey, Rosanna M.

AU - Kenney, Timothy

AU - Chu, Bong Chul

AU - Mohler, Emile R.

AU - Steiner, Claudia Angelica

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Linkage of US state hospital discharge records to state death certificate records offers the possibility of tracking long-term mortality outcomes across large, diverse patient populations, which may be useful for comparative effective analyses. Aim: To demonstrate the value of linking state community hospital discharge data to vital statistics death files for research by conducting a comparative effectiveness analysis. Methods: Linked Patient Discharge Data and Vital Statistics Death Files from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development were used to compare survival rates for patients with an elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm who received open aneurysm repair (OAR) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The sample consisted of 13,652 hospitalized patients who underwent an OAR or EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1 July 2000 and 31 January 2006. Patients were matched using propensity scores (8966 patients in the matched sample). In-hospital, 30-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality rates were compared between the OAR and EVAR populations, before and after propensity score matching. Results: We found a few data anomalies (92 out of 13,652), primarily in patients' sex and date of death. The analysis revealed that in the matched cohort, in-hospital and 30-day postdischarge mortality rates were significantly lower following EVAR than OAR; however, consistent with previous clinical trials, differences in the 1-and 5-year rates were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that linked US state discharge and mortality data can be a valuable resource for comparative effectiveness analyses. In particular, this approach may be useful when generally available data sets such as Medicare claims data limit the generalizability of findings. Policy-makers and others should consider greater investments in these data.

AB - Background: Linkage of US state hospital discharge records to state death certificate records offers the possibility of tracking long-term mortality outcomes across large, diverse patient populations, which may be useful for comparative effective analyses. Aim: To demonstrate the value of linking state community hospital discharge data to vital statistics death files for research by conducting a comparative effectiveness analysis. Methods: Linked Patient Discharge Data and Vital Statistics Death Files from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development were used to compare survival rates for patients with an elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm who received open aneurysm repair (OAR) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The sample consisted of 13,652 hospitalized patients who underwent an OAR or EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1 July 2000 and 31 January 2006. Patients were matched using propensity scores (8966 patients in the matched sample). In-hospital, 30-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality rates were compared between the OAR and EVAR populations, before and after propensity score matching. Results: We found a few data anomalies (92 out of 13,652), primarily in patients' sex and date of death. The analysis revealed that in the matched cohort, in-hospital and 30-day postdischarge mortality rates were significantly lower following EVAR than OAR; however, consistent with previous clinical trials, differences in the 1-and 5-year rates were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that linked US state discharge and mortality data can be a valuable resource for comparative effectiveness analyses. In particular, this approach may be useful when generally available data sets such as Medicare claims data limit the generalizability of findings. Policy-makers and others should consider greater investments in these data.

KW - abdominal aortic aneurysm

KW - comparative effectiveness

KW - linked data

KW - observational data analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886945639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886945639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2217/cer.13.4

DO - 10.2217/cer.13.4

M3 - Article

C2 - 24236559

AN - SCOPUS:84886945639

VL - 2

SP - 175

EP - 184

JO - Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

JF - Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

SN - 2042-6305

IS - 2

ER -