The value of cognitive neuropsychology: The case of vision research

Michael McCloskey, Thitaporn Chaisilprungraung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely viewed as inherently flawed or weak, despite well-reasoned arguments to the contrary by many theorists. Rather than attempting yet another defence of cognitive neuropsychology on logical grounds, we point out through examples that in practice, cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely accepted as valid and important, and has had a major impact on cognitive theory and research. Objections offered in the abstract rarely arise in the context of actual studies. We develop these points through examples from the domain of vision, discussing cerebral achromatopsia and akinetopsia, selective impairment and sparing of face recognition, perception–action dissociations, and blindsight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 27 2017

Fingerprint

Color Vision Defects
Neuropsychology
Research
Facial Recognition
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Theorists
Face Recognition
Dissociation
Impairment
Logic
Cognitive Theory

Keywords

  • Achromatopsia
  • akinetopsia
  • blindsight
  • perception–action dissociations
  • prosopagnosia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

The value of cognitive neuropsychology : The case of vision research. / McCloskey, Michael; Chaisilprungraung, Thitaporn.

In: Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27.06.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCloskey, Michael ; Chaisilprungraung, Thitaporn. / The value of cognitive neuropsychology : The case of vision research. In: Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2017 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{0b55ff2d6caa45c7bde851ad6a04e4e7,
title = "The value of cognitive neuropsychology: The case of vision research",
abstract = "Cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely viewed as inherently flawed or weak, despite well-reasoned arguments to the contrary by many theorists. Rather than attempting yet another defence of cognitive neuropsychology on logical grounds, we point out through examples that in practice, cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely accepted as valid and important, and has had a major impact on cognitive theory and research. Objections offered in the abstract rarely arise in the context of actual studies. We develop these points through examples from the domain of vision, discussing cerebral achromatopsia and akinetopsia, selective impairment and sparing of face recognition, perception–action dissociations, and blindsight.",
keywords = "Achromatopsia, akinetopsia, blindsight, perception–action dissociations, prosopagnosia",
author = "Michael McCloskey and Thitaporn Chaisilprungraung",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/02643294.2017.1342618",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Cognitive Neuropsychology",
issn = "0264-3294",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of cognitive neuropsychology

T2 - The case of vision research

AU - McCloskey, Michael

AU - Chaisilprungraung, Thitaporn

PY - 2017/6/27

Y1 - 2017/6/27

N2 - Cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely viewed as inherently flawed or weak, despite well-reasoned arguments to the contrary by many theorists. Rather than attempting yet another defence of cognitive neuropsychology on logical grounds, we point out through examples that in practice, cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely accepted as valid and important, and has had a major impact on cognitive theory and research. Objections offered in the abstract rarely arise in the context of actual studies. We develop these points through examples from the domain of vision, discussing cerebral achromatopsia and akinetopsia, selective impairment and sparing of face recognition, perception–action dissociations, and blindsight.

AB - Cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely viewed as inherently flawed or weak, despite well-reasoned arguments to the contrary by many theorists. Rather than attempting yet another defence of cognitive neuropsychology on logical grounds, we point out through examples that in practice, cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely accepted as valid and important, and has had a major impact on cognitive theory and research. Objections offered in the abstract rarely arise in the context of actual studies. We develop these points through examples from the domain of vision, discussing cerebral achromatopsia and akinetopsia, selective impairment and sparing of face recognition, perception–action dissociations, and blindsight.

KW - Achromatopsia

KW - akinetopsia

KW - blindsight

KW - perception–action dissociations

KW - prosopagnosia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021261943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021261943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02643294.2017.1342618

DO - 10.1080/02643294.2017.1342618

M3 - Article

C2 - 28649924

AN - SCOPUS:85021261943

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology

JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology

SN - 0264-3294

ER -