The value of cognitive neuropsychology: The case of vision research

Michael McCloskey, Thitaporn Chaisilprungraung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely viewed as inherently flawed or weak, despite well-reasoned arguments to the contrary by many theorists. Rather than attempting yet another defence of cognitive neuropsychology on logical grounds, we point out through examples that in practice, cognitive neuropsychological evidence is widely accepted as valid and important, and has had a major impact on cognitive theory and research. Objections offered in the abstract rarely arise in the context of actual studies. We develop these points through examples from the domain of vision, discussing cerebral achromatopsia and akinetopsia, selective impairment and sparing of face recognition, perception–action dissociations, and blindsight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-419
Number of pages8
JournalCognitive neuropsychology
Volume34
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 17 2017

Keywords

  • Achromatopsia
  • akinetopsia
  • blindsight
  • perception–action dissociations
  • prosopagnosia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The value of cognitive neuropsychology: The case of vision research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this