TY - JOUR
T1 - The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine
T2 - Discrepant findings persist
AU - Kuijpers, Chantal C.H.J.
AU - Fronczek, Judith
AU - Van De Goot, Frank R.W.
AU - Niessen, Hans W.M.
AU - van Diest, Paulus Joannes
AU - Jiwa, Mehdi
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - Aims: Although the autopsy is still the gold standard for quality assessment of clinical diagnoses, autopsy rates have been declining over the last decades to <10%. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of autopsies in the high-tech medicine era by determining the frequency of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. Methods: We classified all adult autopsy cases (n=460), performed at Symbiant, Pathology Expert Centre, in 2007 and 2012/2013, as having major, or minor discrepancy or total concordance. The roles of possible contributory factors were analysed. Finally, we assessed the role of microscopic examination in identifying cause of death. Results: Major and minor discrepancies were found in 23.5% and 32.6% of the classifiable autopsies, respectively. Most commonly observed major discrepancies were myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism and pneumonia. Improper imaging and discontinuation of active treatment were significantly associated with a higher and a lower frequency of major discrepancies, respectively. Comparing 2007 and 2012/2013, the frequency of minor discrepancies significantly increased from 26.8% to 39.3%. Final admission length of >2 days was significantly associated with a lower frequency of class III minor discrepancies. Microscopic examination contributed to establishing cause of death in 19.6% of the cases. Conclusions: Discrepant findings persist at autopsy, even in the era of high-tech medicine. Therefore, autopsies still should serve as a very important part of quality control in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Learning from individual and system-related diagnostic errors can aid in improving patient safety.
AB - Aims: Although the autopsy is still the gold standard for quality assessment of clinical diagnoses, autopsy rates have been declining over the last decades to <10%. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of autopsies in the high-tech medicine era by determining the frequency of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. Methods: We classified all adult autopsy cases (n=460), performed at Symbiant, Pathology Expert Centre, in 2007 and 2012/2013, as having major, or minor discrepancy or total concordance. The roles of possible contributory factors were analysed. Finally, we assessed the role of microscopic examination in identifying cause of death. Results: Major and minor discrepancies were found in 23.5% and 32.6% of the classifiable autopsies, respectively. Most commonly observed major discrepancies were myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism and pneumonia. Improper imaging and discontinuation of active treatment were significantly associated with a higher and a lower frequency of major discrepancies, respectively. Comparing 2007 and 2012/2013, the frequency of minor discrepancies significantly increased from 26.8% to 39.3%. Final admission length of >2 days was significantly associated with a lower frequency of class III minor discrepancies. Microscopic examination contributed to establishing cause of death in 19.6% of the cases. Conclusions: Discrepant findings persist at autopsy, even in the era of high-tech medicine. Therefore, autopsies still should serve as a very important part of quality control in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Learning from individual and system-related diagnostic errors can aid in improving patient safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901654370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901654370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202122
DO - 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202122
M3 - Article
C2 - 24596140
AN - SCOPUS:84901654370
SN - 0021-9746
VL - 67
SP - 512
EP - 519
JO - Journal of clinical pathology
JF - Journal of clinical pathology
IS - 6
ER -