TY - JOUR
T1 - The VA is critical to academic development
AU - Robinson, Celia N.
AU - Freischlag, Julie
AU - Brunicardi, F. Charles
AU - Berger, David H.
PY - 2010/11/1
Y1 - 2010/11/1
N2 - Background: A principal responsibility for surgical chairs is the development of academic programs. This has been challenging in light of the current economic downturn, declining reimbursement, and changes in funding. The aim of this study was to determine the importance that surgical chairs place on the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regarding their ability to develop academic programs. Methods: A Web-based survey was constructed and the link sent to 122 university-based surgical department chairs in the United States in 2009 to evaluate previous and current VA affiliations as well as attitudes associated with academic program development. Results: A total of 58 of 122 surveys (47.5%) were completed. Seventy percent of surgical chairs received some of their training at VA facilities, and 65% have held VA appointments. Although only 62% of programs were affiliated with VA centers, 91% of chairs believed that VA affiliations were important for their training programs. Additionally, 91% felt that the VA was a good place for faculty development. Finally, 78% indicated that the opportunity to obtain VA research funding is important for academic faculty development. Conclusion: Academic program development is an important part of a chair's responsibilities. The overwhelming majority of surgical chairs view a VA affiliation as an important resource in building academic surgical programs.
AB - Background: A principal responsibility for surgical chairs is the development of academic programs. This has been challenging in light of the current economic downturn, declining reimbursement, and changes in funding. The aim of this study was to determine the importance that surgical chairs place on the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regarding their ability to develop academic programs. Methods: A Web-based survey was constructed and the link sent to 122 university-based surgical department chairs in the United States in 2009 to evaluate previous and current VA affiliations as well as attitudes associated with academic program development. Results: A total of 58 of 122 surveys (47.5%) were completed. Seventy percent of surgical chairs received some of their training at VA facilities, and 65% have held VA appointments. Although only 62% of programs were affiliated with VA centers, 91% of chairs believed that VA affiliations were important for their training programs. Additionally, 91% felt that the VA was a good place for faculty development. Finally, 78% indicated that the opportunity to obtain VA research funding is important for academic faculty development. Conclusion: Academic program development is an important part of a chair's responsibilities. The overwhelming majority of surgical chairs view a VA affiliation as an important resource in building academic surgical programs.
KW - Academic medical center
KW - Academic program development
KW - General surgery education
KW - US Department of Veterans Affairs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149290626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149290626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.007
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 21056142
AN - SCOPUS:78149290626
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 200
SP - 628
EP - 631
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 5
ER -