TY - JOUR
T1 - The utility of handheld echocardiography for early rheumatic heart disease diagnosis
T2 - A field study
AU - Beaton, Andrea
AU - Lu, Jimmy C.
AU - Aliku, Twalib
AU - Dean, Peter
AU - Gaur, Lasya
AU - Weinberg, Jacqueline
AU - Godown, Justin
AU - Lwabi, Peter
AU - Mirembe, Grace
AU - Okello, Emmy
AU - Reese, Allison
AU - Shrestha-Astudillo, Ashley
AU - Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler
AU - Scheel, Janet
AU - Webb, Catherine
AU - McCarter, Robert
AU - Ensing, Greg
AU - Sable, Craig
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015.
PY - 2015/5
Y1 - 2015/5
N2 - Aims: TheWorld Heart Federation (WHF) guidelines for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) are designed for a standard portable echocardiography (STAND) machine. Arecent study in a tertiary care centre demonstrated that they also had good sensitivity and specificity when modified for use with handheld echocardiography (HAND). Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of HAND for early RHD diagnosis in the setting of a large-scale field screening. Methods and results: STAND was performed in 4773 children in Gulu, Uganda, with 10% randomly assigned to also undergo HAND. Additionally, any child with mitral or aortic regurgitation also underwent HAND. Studies were performed by experienced echocardiographers and blindly reviewedby cardiologists using 2012WHFcriteria, which were modified slightly for HAND - due to the lack of spectral Doppler capability. Paired echocardiograms were performed in 1420 children (mean age 10.8 and 53% female), resulting in 1234 children who were normal, 133 who met criteria for borderline RHD, 47 who met criteria for definite RHD, and 6 who had other diagnoses. HAND had good sensitivity and specificity for RHD detection (78.9 and 87.2%, respectively), but was most sensitive for definite RHD (97.9%). Inter- and intra-reviewer agreement ranged between 66-83 and 71.4-94.1%, respectively. Conclusions: HAND has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of early RHD, performing best for definite RHD. Protocols for RHD detection utilizing HAND will need to include confirmation by STAND to avoid over-diagnosis. Strategies that evaluate simplified screening protocols and training of non-physicians hold promise for more wide spread deployment of HAND-based protocols.
AB - Aims: TheWorld Heart Federation (WHF) guidelines for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) are designed for a standard portable echocardiography (STAND) machine. Arecent study in a tertiary care centre demonstrated that they also had good sensitivity and specificity when modified for use with handheld echocardiography (HAND). Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of HAND for early RHD diagnosis in the setting of a large-scale field screening. Methods and results: STAND was performed in 4773 children in Gulu, Uganda, with 10% randomly assigned to also undergo HAND. Additionally, any child with mitral or aortic regurgitation also underwent HAND. Studies were performed by experienced echocardiographers and blindly reviewedby cardiologists using 2012WHFcriteria, which were modified slightly for HAND - due to the lack of spectral Doppler capability. Paired echocardiograms were performed in 1420 children (mean age 10.8 and 53% female), resulting in 1234 children who were normal, 133 who met criteria for borderline RHD, 47 who met criteria for definite RHD, and 6 who had other diagnoses. HAND had good sensitivity and specificity for RHD detection (78.9 and 87.2%, respectively), but was most sensitive for definite RHD (97.9%). Inter- and intra-reviewer agreement ranged between 66-83 and 71.4-94.1%, respectively. Conclusions: HAND has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of early RHD, performing best for definite RHD. Protocols for RHD detection utilizing HAND will need to include confirmation by STAND to avoid over-diagnosis. Strategies that evaluate simplified screening protocols and training of non-physicians hold promise for more wide spread deployment of HAND-based protocols.
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Handheld echocardiography
KW - Rheumatic heart disease
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925005016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925005016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jeu296
DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jeu296
M3 - Article
C2 - 25564396
AN - SCOPUS:84925005016
SN - 2047-2404
VL - 16
SP - 475
EP - 482
JO - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 5
ER -