The use of spelling for variant classification in primary progressive aphasia: Theoretical and practical implications

Kyriaki Neophytou, Robert W. Wiley, Brenda C Rapp, Kyrana Tsapkini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Currently, variant subtyping in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) requires an expert neurologist and extensive language and cognitive testing. Spelling impairments appear early in the development of the disorder, and the three PPA variants (non-fluent - nfvPPA; semantic - svPPA; logopenic - lvPPA) reportedly show fairly distinct spelling profiles. Given the theoretical and empirical evidence indicating that spelling may serve as a proxy for spoken language, the current study aimed to determine whether spelling performance alone, when evaluated with advanced statistical analyses, allows for accurate PPA variant classification. A spelling to dictation task (with real words and pseudowords) was administered to 33 PPA individuals: 17 lvPPA, 10 nfvPPA, 6 svPPA. Using machine learning classification algorithms, we obtained pairwise variant classification accuracies that ranged between 67 and 100%. In additional analyses that assumed no prior knowledge of each case's variant, classification accuracies ranged between 59 and 70%. To our knowledge, this is the first time that all the PPA variants, including the most challenging logopenic variant, have been classified with such high accuracy when using information from a single language task. These results underscore the rich structure of the spelling process and support the use of a spelling task in PPA variant classification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number107157
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume133
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Progressive Aphasia
Language
Primary Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia
Proxy
Semantics

Keywords

  • Language
  • Logopenic variant
  • Non-fluent variant
  • Primary progressive aphasia
  • Semantic variant
  • Spelling
  • Variant classification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

The use of spelling for variant classification in primary progressive aphasia : Theoretical and practical implications. / Neophytou, Kyriaki; Wiley, Robert W.; Rapp, Brenda C; Tsapkini, Kyrana.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 133, 107157, 01.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a1aa7c513f5417eb90525febb5f7bc8,
title = "The use of spelling for variant classification in primary progressive aphasia: Theoretical and practical implications",
abstract = "Currently, variant subtyping in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) requires an expert neurologist and extensive language and cognitive testing. Spelling impairments appear early in the development of the disorder, and the three PPA variants (non-fluent - nfvPPA; semantic - svPPA; logopenic - lvPPA) reportedly show fairly distinct spelling profiles. Given the theoretical and empirical evidence indicating that spelling may serve as a proxy for spoken language, the current study aimed to determine whether spelling performance alone, when evaluated with advanced statistical analyses, allows for accurate PPA variant classification. A spelling to dictation task (with real words and pseudowords) was administered to 33 PPA individuals: 17 lvPPA, 10 nfvPPA, 6 svPPA. Using machine learning classification algorithms, we obtained pairwise variant classification accuracies that ranged between 67 and 100{\%}. In additional analyses that assumed no prior knowledge of each case's variant, classification accuracies ranged between 59 and 70{\%}. To our knowledge, this is the first time that all the PPA variants, including the most challenging logopenic variant, have been classified with such high accuracy when using information from a single language task. These results underscore the rich structure of the spelling process and support the use of a spelling task in PPA variant classification.",
keywords = "Language, Logopenic variant, Non-fluent variant, Primary progressive aphasia, Semantic variant, Spelling, Variant classification",
author = "Kyriaki Neophytou and Wiley, {Robert W.} and Rapp, {Brenda C} and Kyrana Tsapkini",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107157",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "133",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of spelling for variant classification in primary progressive aphasia

T2 - Theoretical and practical implications

AU - Neophytou, Kyriaki

AU - Wiley, Robert W.

AU - Rapp, Brenda C

AU - Tsapkini, Kyrana

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Currently, variant subtyping in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) requires an expert neurologist and extensive language and cognitive testing. Spelling impairments appear early in the development of the disorder, and the three PPA variants (non-fluent - nfvPPA; semantic - svPPA; logopenic - lvPPA) reportedly show fairly distinct spelling profiles. Given the theoretical and empirical evidence indicating that spelling may serve as a proxy for spoken language, the current study aimed to determine whether spelling performance alone, when evaluated with advanced statistical analyses, allows for accurate PPA variant classification. A spelling to dictation task (with real words and pseudowords) was administered to 33 PPA individuals: 17 lvPPA, 10 nfvPPA, 6 svPPA. Using machine learning classification algorithms, we obtained pairwise variant classification accuracies that ranged between 67 and 100%. In additional analyses that assumed no prior knowledge of each case's variant, classification accuracies ranged between 59 and 70%. To our knowledge, this is the first time that all the PPA variants, including the most challenging logopenic variant, have been classified with such high accuracy when using information from a single language task. These results underscore the rich structure of the spelling process and support the use of a spelling task in PPA variant classification.

AB - Currently, variant subtyping in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) requires an expert neurologist and extensive language and cognitive testing. Spelling impairments appear early in the development of the disorder, and the three PPA variants (non-fluent - nfvPPA; semantic - svPPA; logopenic - lvPPA) reportedly show fairly distinct spelling profiles. Given the theoretical and empirical evidence indicating that spelling may serve as a proxy for spoken language, the current study aimed to determine whether spelling performance alone, when evaluated with advanced statistical analyses, allows for accurate PPA variant classification. A spelling to dictation task (with real words and pseudowords) was administered to 33 PPA individuals: 17 lvPPA, 10 nfvPPA, 6 svPPA. Using machine learning classification algorithms, we obtained pairwise variant classification accuracies that ranged between 67 and 100%. In additional analyses that assumed no prior knowledge of each case's variant, classification accuracies ranged between 59 and 70%. To our knowledge, this is the first time that all the PPA variants, including the most challenging logopenic variant, have been classified with such high accuracy when using information from a single language task. These results underscore the rich structure of the spelling process and support the use of a spelling task in PPA variant classification.

KW - Language

KW - Logopenic variant

KW - Non-fluent variant

KW - Primary progressive aphasia

KW - Semantic variant

KW - Spelling

KW - Variant classification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071991989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071991989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107157

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107157

M3 - Article

C2 - 31401078

AN - SCOPUS:85071991989

VL - 133

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

M1 - 107157

ER -