The use of clinical guidelines highlights ongoing educational gaps in physicians' knowledge and decision making related to diabetes

Mark D. Corriere, Laura B. Minang, Stephen D Sisson, Frederick L. Brancati, Rita R. Kalyani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes are a resource for providers to manage their patients and may help highlight specific areas in need of further education and training. We sought to determine how often guidelines are used and the relationship to physicians' diabetes-related knowledge and decision making. Methods. Existing users of electronic clinical support tools were invited to complete an online questionnaire. A knowledge score was calculated for five questions related to prevention of diabetes and treatment of its complications. We explored the association of clinical guideline use with diabetes-related knowledge and self-reported decision making using logistic regression models, adjusted for key covariates. Results: Of 383 physicians completing the questionnaire, 53% reported using diabetes guidelines routinely. Mean diabetes knowledge score for guideline users (GU) was significantly higher than non-guideline users (NGU) (3.37 ± 0.072 vs. 2.76 ± 0.084; p <0.001). GU were significantly more likely to report a good understanding of type 2 diabetes medications (OR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.95-4.61; p <0.001). GU were less likely to report their unfamiliarity with insulin as an important barrier to early insulin use (OR = 0.41, 0.21-0.80; p = 0.007) and with pharmacologic options as a barrier to prescribing intensive multifactorial interventions (OR = 0.32, 0.17-0.58; p <0.001). Associations remained significant after adjusting for physician specialty, practice volume and frequency diagnosing or treating diabetes patients. Conclusions: Significant gaps exist in diabetes-related knowledge and decision making among practicing physicians, as highlighted by clinical guideline use. The development of educational and training strategies to address these needs may ultimately improve outcomes for patients with diabetes and should be investigated in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number186
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 8 2014

Fingerprint

chronic illness
Decision Making
physician
Guidelines
Physicians
decision making
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Logistic Models
Insulin
questionnaire
further education
knowledge
Education
medication
logistics
electronics
regression
resources

Keywords

  • Clinical Guidelines
  • Diabetes
  • Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

The use of clinical guidelines highlights ongoing educational gaps in physicians' knowledge and decision making related to diabetes. / Corriere, Mark D.; Minang, Laura B.; Sisson, Stephen D; Brancati, Frederick L.; Kalyani, Rita R.

In: BMC Medical Education, Vol. 14, No. 1, 186, 08.09.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{06cf1718ce6942289797be7c6ed4fa12,
title = "The use of clinical guidelines highlights ongoing educational gaps in physicians' knowledge and decision making related to diabetes",
abstract = "Background: Clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes are a resource for providers to manage their patients and may help highlight specific areas in need of further education and training. We sought to determine how often guidelines are used and the relationship to physicians' diabetes-related knowledge and decision making. Methods. Existing users of electronic clinical support tools were invited to complete an online questionnaire. A knowledge score was calculated for five questions related to prevention of diabetes and treatment of its complications. We explored the association of clinical guideline use with diabetes-related knowledge and self-reported decision making using logistic regression models, adjusted for key covariates. Results: Of 383 physicians completing the questionnaire, 53{\%} reported using diabetes guidelines routinely. Mean diabetes knowledge score for guideline users (GU) was significantly higher than non-guideline users (NGU) (3.37 ± 0.072 vs. 2.76 ± 0.084; p <0.001). GU were significantly more likely to report a good understanding of type 2 diabetes medications (OR = 2.99, 95{\%} CI 1.95-4.61; p <0.001). GU were less likely to report their unfamiliarity with insulin as an important barrier to early insulin use (OR = 0.41, 0.21-0.80; p = 0.007) and with pharmacologic options as a barrier to prescribing intensive multifactorial interventions (OR = 0.32, 0.17-0.58; p <0.001). Associations remained significant after adjusting for physician specialty, practice volume and frequency diagnosing or treating diabetes patients. Conclusions: Significant gaps exist in diabetes-related knowledge and decision making among practicing physicians, as highlighted by clinical guideline use. The development of educational and training strategies to address these needs may ultimately improve outcomes for patients with diabetes and should be investigated in the future.",
keywords = "Clinical Guidelines, Diabetes, Education",
author = "Corriere, {Mark D.} and Minang, {Laura B.} and Sisson, {Stephen D} and Brancati, {Frederick L.} and Kalyani, {Rita R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6920-14-186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Medical Education",
issn = "1472-6920",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of clinical guidelines highlights ongoing educational gaps in physicians' knowledge and decision making related to diabetes

AU - Corriere, Mark D.

AU - Minang, Laura B.

AU - Sisson, Stephen D

AU - Brancati, Frederick L.

AU - Kalyani, Rita R.

PY - 2014/9/8

Y1 - 2014/9/8

N2 - Background: Clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes are a resource for providers to manage their patients and may help highlight specific areas in need of further education and training. We sought to determine how often guidelines are used and the relationship to physicians' diabetes-related knowledge and decision making. Methods. Existing users of electronic clinical support tools were invited to complete an online questionnaire. A knowledge score was calculated for five questions related to prevention of diabetes and treatment of its complications. We explored the association of clinical guideline use with diabetes-related knowledge and self-reported decision making using logistic regression models, adjusted for key covariates. Results: Of 383 physicians completing the questionnaire, 53% reported using diabetes guidelines routinely. Mean diabetes knowledge score for guideline users (GU) was significantly higher than non-guideline users (NGU) (3.37 ± 0.072 vs. 2.76 ± 0.084; p <0.001). GU were significantly more likely to report a good understanding of type 2 diabetes medications (OR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.95-4.61; p <0.001). GU were less likely to report their unfamiliarity with insulin as an important barrier to early insulin use (OR = 0.41, 0.21-0.80; p = 0.007) and with pharmacologic options as a barrier to prescribing intensive multifactorial interventions (OR = 0.32, 0.17-0.58; p <0.001). Associations remained significant after adjusting for physician specialty, practice volume and frequency diagnosing or treating diabetes patients. Conclusions: Significant gaps exist in diabetes-related knowledge and decision making among practicing physicians, as highlighted by clinical guideline use. The development of educational and training strategies to address these needs may ultimately improve outcomes for patients with diabetes and should be investigated in the future.

AB - Background: Clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes are a resource for providers to manage their patients and may help highlight specific areas in need of further education and training. We sought to determine how often guidelines are used and the relationship to physicians' diabetes-related knowledge and decision making. Methods. Existing users of electronic clinical support tools were invited to complete an online questionnaire. A knowledge score was calculated for five questions related to prevention of diabetes and treatment of its complications. We explored the association of clinical guideline use with diabetes-related knowledge and self-reported decision making using logistic regression models, adjusted for key covariates. Results: Of 383 physicians completing the questionnaire, 53% reported using diabetes guidelines routinely. Mean diabetes knowledge score for guideline users (GU) was significantly higher than non-guideline users (NGU) (3.37 ± 0.072 vs. 2.76 ± 0.084; p <0.001). GU were significantly more likely to report a good understanding of type 2 diabetes medications (OR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.95-4.61; p <0.001). GU were less likely to report their unfamiliarity with insulin as an important barrier to early insulin use (OR = 0.41, 0.21-0.80; p = 0.007) and with pharmacologic options as a barrier to prescribing intensive multifactorial interventions (OR = 0.32, 0.17-0.58; p <0.001). Associations remained significant after adjusting for physician specialty, practice volume and frequency diagnosing or treating diabetes patients. Conclusions: Significant gaps exist in diabetes-related knowledge and decision making among practicing physicians, as highlighted by clinical guideline use. The development of educational and training strategies to address these needs may ultimately improve outcomes for patients with diabetes and should be investigated in the future.

KW - Clinical Guidelines

KW - Diabetes

KW - Education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908410527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908410527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-186

DO - 10.1186/1472-6920-14-186

M3 - Article

C2 - 25199672

AN - SCOPUS:84908410527

VL - 14

JO - BMC Medical Education

JF - BMC Medical Education

SN - 1472-6920

IS - 1

M1 - 186

ER -