The trauma model of dissociation: Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)

Steven Jay Lynn, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Harald Merckelbach, Timo Giesbrecht, Richard J. McNally, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Maggie Bruck, Maryanne Garry, Anne Malaktaris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma- dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)896-910
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume140
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dissociative Disorders
Wounds and Injuries
Fantasy
Multiple Personality Disorder
Amnesia
Dissociation
Trauma
Fiction

Keywords

  • Dissociation
  • Dissociative disorder
  • Dissociative identity disorder
  • Sociocognitive model
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., McNally, R. J., Loftus, E. F., ... Malaktaris, A. (2014). The trauma model of dissociation: Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035570

The trauma model of dissociation : Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). / Lynn, Steven Jay; Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Merckelbach, Harald; Giesbrecht, Timo; McNally, Richard J.; Loftus, Elizabeth F.; Bruck, Maggie; Garry, Maryanne; Malaktaris, Anne.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 140, No. 3, 2014, p. 896-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lynn, SJ, Lilienfeld, SO, Merckelbach, H, Giesbrecht, T, McNally, RJ, Loftus, EF, Bruck, M, Garry, M & Malaktaris, A 2014, 'The trauma model of dissociation: Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)', Psychological Bulletin, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035570
Lynn, Steven Jay ; Lilienfeld, Scott O. ; Merckelbach, Harald ; Giesbrecht, Timo ; McNally, Richard J. ; Loftus, Elizabeth F. ; Bruck, Maggie ; Garry, Maryanne ; Malaktaris, Anne. / The trauma model of dissociation : Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). In: Psychological Bulletin. 2014 ; Vol. 140, No. 3. pp. 896-910.
@article{7159797016684fa296877a74de4161b6,
title = "The trauma model of dissociation: Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)",
abstract = "Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma- dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders.",
keywords = "Dissociation, Dissociative disorder, Dissociative identity disorder, Sociocognitive model, Trauma",
author = "Lynn, {Steven Jay} and Lilienfeld, {Scott O.} and Harald Merckelbach and Timo Giesbrecht and McNally, {Richard J.} and Loftus, {Elizabeth F.} and Maggie Bruck and Maryanne Garry and Anne Malaktaris",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1037/a0035570",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "896--910",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The trauma model of dissociation

T2 - Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012)

AU - Lynn, Steven Jay

AU - Lilienfeld, Scott O.

AU - Merckelbach, Harald

AU - Giesbrecht, Timo

AU - McNally, Richard J.

AU - Loftus, Elizabeth F.

AU - Bruck, Maggie

AU - Garry, Maryanne

AU - Malaktaris, Anne

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma- dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders.

AB - Dalenberg et al. (2012) argued that convincing evidence (a) supports the longstanding trauma model (TM), which posits that early trauma plays a key role in the genesis of dissociation; and (b) refutes the fantasy model (FM), which posits that fantasy proneness, suggestibility, cognitive failures, and other variables foster dissociation. We review evidence bearing on Dalenberg et al.'s 8 predictions and find them largely wanting in empirical support. We contend that the authors repeat errors committed by many previous proponents of the TM, such as attributing a central etiological role to trauma in the absence of sufficient evidence. Specifically, Dalenberg et al. leap too quickly from correlational data to causal conclusions, do not adequately consider the lack of corroboration of abuse in many studies, and underestimate the relation between dissociation and false memories. Nevertheless, we identify points of agreement between the TM and FM regarding potential moderators and mediators of dissociative symptoms (e.g., family environment, biological vulnerabilities) and the hypothesis that dissociative identity disorder is a disorder of self-understanding. We acknowledge that trauma may play a causal role in dissociation but that this role is less central and specific than Dalenberg et al. contend. Finally, although a key assumption of the TM is dissociative amnesia, the notion that people can encode traumatic experiences without being able to recall them lacks strong empirical support. Accordingly, we conclude that the field should now abandon the simple trauma- dissociation model and embrace multifactorial models that accommodate the diversity of causes of dissociation and dissociative disorders.

KW - Dissociation

KW - Dissociative disorder

KW - Dissociative identity disorder

KW - Sociocognitive model

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904896227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904896227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0035570

DO - 10.1037/a0035570

M3 - Article

C2 - 24773505

AN - SCOPUS:84904896227

VL - 140

SP - 896

EP - 910

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 3

ER -