The structure of bacteriorhodopsin: An emerging consensus

Sriram Subramaniam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Six different sets of coordinates have been recently published for bacteriorhodopsin, with reported resolutions ranging from 3.5 Å to 2.3 Å. Three of these are the result of electron crystallographic investigations of two-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin, whereas the others are from X-ray crystallographic studies of three-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin. How similar are these models? Are the structure determinations using X-ray diffraction data more accurate than those determined by electron crystallography? Is any one of these coordinate sets closer to the 'real' structure of bacteriorhodopsin than the others? Does the availability of newer models bring us closer to understanding how bacteriorhodopsin really works? These questions, as well as some related issues, are currently being explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-468
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bacteriorhodopsins
Electrons
Crystallography
X-Ray Diffraction
X-Rays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Structural Biology

Cite this

The structure of bacteriorhodopsin : An emerging consensus. / Subramaniam, Sriram.

In: Current Opinion in Structural Biology, Vol. 9, No. 4, 08.1999, p. 462-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Subramaniam, Sriram. / The structure of bacteriorhodopsin : An emerging consensus. In: Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 1999 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 462-468.
@article{78125a0fc2ce47b4ac4ac1a4bcfcac07,
title = "The structure of bacteriorhodopsin: An emerging consensus",
abstract = "Six different sets of coordinates have been recently published for bacteriorhodopsin, with reported resolutions ranging from 3.5 {\AA} to 2.3 {\AA}. Three of these are the result of electron crystallographic investigations of two-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin, whereas the others are from X-ray crystallographic studies of three-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin. How similar are these models? Are the structure determinations using X-ray diffraction data more accurate than those determined by electron crystallography? Is any one of these coordinate sets closer to the 'real' structure of bacteriorhodopsin than the others? Does the availability of newer models bring us closer to understanding how bacteriorhodopsin really works? These questions, as well as some related issues, are currently being explored.",
author = "Sriram Subramaniam",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80065-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "462--468",
journal = "Current Opinion in Structural Biology",
issn = "0959-440X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The structure of bacteriorhodopsin

T2 - An emerging consensus

AU - Subramaniam, Sriram

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - Six different sets of coordinates have been recently published for bacteriorhodopsin, with reported resolutions ranging from 3.5 Å to 2.3 Å. Three of these are the result of electron crystallographic investigations of two-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin, whereas the others are from X-ray crystallographic studies of three-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin. How similar are these models? Are the structure determinations using X-ray diffraction data more accurate than those determined by electron crystallography? Is any one of these coordinate sets closer to the 'real' structure of bacteriorhodopsin than the others? Does the availability of newer models bring us closer to understanding how bacteriorhodopsin really works? These questions, as well as some related issues, are currently being explored.

AB - Six different sets of coordinates have been recently published for bacteriorhodopsin, with reported resolutions ranging from 3.5 Å to 2.3 Å. Three of these are the result of electron crystallographic investigations of two-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin, whereas the others are from X-ray crystallographic studies of three-dimensional crystals of bacteriorhodopsin. How similar are these models? Are the structure determinations using X-ray diffraction data more accurate than those determined by electron crystallography? Is any one of these coordinate sets closer to the 'real' structure of bacteriorhodopsin than the others? Does the availability of newer models bring us closer to understanding how bacteriorhodopsin really works? These questions, as well as some related issues, are currently being explored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033179340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033179340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80065-7

DO - 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80065-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 10449372

AN - SCOPUS:0033179340

VL - 9

SP - 462

EP - 468

JO - Current Opinion in Structural Biology

JF - Current Opinion in Structural Biology

SN - 0959-440X

IS - 4

ER -