The stroke prevention policy model: Linking evidence and clinical decisions

David B. Matchar, Gregory P. Samsa, J. Rosser Matthews, Marek Ancukiewicz, Giovanni Parmigiani, Vic Hasselblad, Phillip A. Wolf, Ralph B. D'Agostino, Joseph Lipscomb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Simulation models that support decision and cost-effectiveness analysis can further the goals of evidence-based medicine by facilitating the synthesis of information from several sources into a single comprehensive structure. The Stroke Prevention Policy Model (SPPM) performs this function for the clinical and policy questions that surround stroke prevention. This paper first describes the basic structure and functions of the SPPM, concentrating on the role of large databases (broadly defined as any database that contains many patients, regardless of study design) in providing the SPPM inputs. Next, recognizing that the use of modeling continues to be a source of some controversy in the medical community, it discusses the philosophical underpinnings of the SPPM. Finally, it discusses conclusions in the context of both stroke prevention and other complex medical decisions. We conclude that despite the difficulties in developing comprehensive models (for example, the length and complexity of model development and validation processes, the proprietary nature of data sources, and the necessity for developing new software), the benefits of such models exceed the costs of continuing to rely on more conventional methods. Although they should not replace the clinician in decision making, comprehensive models based on the best available evidence from large databases can support decision making in medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)704-711
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Issue number8 II SUPPL.
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'The stroke prevention policy model: Linking evidence and clinical decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this