The slippery slope: Differentiating between quality improvement and research

Robin P. Newhouse, Joan C. Pettit, Stephanie Poe, Laura Rocco

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations


As hospitals strive to create strong work environments for nurses, many use the core requirements for Magnet designation to enhance and build new programs in research and evidence-based practice into patient care and operational processes. The problem is the use of quality improvement projects in these efforts as evidence of a healthy "research" program. This confusion can lead to 3 major consequences: (1) poorly designed and interpreted studies; (2) lack of consideration of subject rights; and (3) Institutional Review Board or other regulatory sanctions for noncompliance with federal, state, and local law and institutional policies. The purpose of this article is to differentiate between research and quality improvement, explore the potential risks of confusing quality improvement with research, and suggest criteria by which to determine the difference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-219
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nursing Administration
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'The slippery slope: Differentiating between quality improvement and research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this