The single active X in human cells: Evolutionary tinkering personified

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

All mammals compensate for sex differences in numbers of X chromosomes by transcribing only a single X chromosome in cells of both sexes; however, they differ from one another in the details of the compensatory mechanisms. These species variations result from chance mutations, species differences in the staging of developmental events, and interactions between events that occur concurrently. Such variations, which have only recently been appreciated, do not interfere with the strategy of establishing a single active X, but they influence how it is carried out. In an overview of X dosage compensation in human cells, I point out the evolutionary variations. I also argue that it is the single active X that is chosen, rather than inactive ones. Further, I suggest that the initial events in the process-those that precede silencing of future inactive X chromosomes-include randomly choosing the future active X, most likely by repressing its XIST locus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-293
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Genetics
Volume130
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

X Chromosome
Sex Characteristics
Mammals
Mutation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Genetics

Cite this

The single active X in human cells : Evolutionary tinkering personified. / Migeon, Barbara R.

In: Human Genetics, Vol. 130, No. 2, 08.2011, p. 281-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ba0dd69a3284783a9931f5ba31e9b12,
title = "The single active X in human cells: Evolutionary tinkering personified",
abstract = "All mammals compensate for sex differences in numbers of X chromosomes by transcribing only a single X chromosome in cells of both sexes; however, they differ from one another in the details of the compensatory mechanisms. These species variations result from chance mutations, species differences in the staging of developmental events, and interactions between events that occur concurrently. Such variations, which have only recently been appreciated, do not interfere with the strategy of establishing a single active X, but they influence how it is carried out. In an overview of X dosage compensation in human cells, I point out the evolutionary variations. I also argue that it is the single active X that is chosen, rather than inactive ones. Further, I suggest that the initial events in the process-those that precede silencing of future inactive X chromosomes-include randomly choosing the future active X, most likely by repressing its XIST locus.",
author = "Migeon, {Barbara R}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00439-011-1016-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "281--293",
journal = "Human Genetics",
issn = "0340-6717",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The single active X in human cells

T2 - Evolutionary tinkering personified

AU - Migeon, Barbara R

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - All mammals compensate for sex differences in numbers of X chromosomes by transcribing only a single X chromosome in cells of both sexes; however, they differ from one another in the details of the compensatory mechanisms. These species variations result from chance mutations, species differences in the staging of developmental events, and interactions between events that occur concurrently. Such variations, which have only recently been appreciated, do not interfere with the strategy of establishing a single active X, but they influence how it is carried out. In an overview of X dosage compensation in human cells, I point out the evolutionary variations. I also argue that it is the single active X that is chosen, rather than inactive ones. Further, I suggest that the initial events in the process-those that precede silencing of future inactive X chromosomes-include randomly choosing the future active X, most likely by repressing its XIST locus.

AB - All mammals compensate for sex differences in numbers of X chromosomes by transcribing only a single X chromosome in cells of both sexes; however, they differ from one another in the details of the compensatory mechanisms. These species variations result from chance mutations, species differences in the staging of developmental events, and interactions between events that occur concurrently. Such variations, which have only recently been appreciated, do not interfere with the strategy of establishing a single active X, but they influence how it is carried out. In an overview of X dosage compensation in human cells, I point out the evolutionary variations. I also argue that it is the single active X that is chosen, rather than inactive ones. Further, I suggest that the initial events in the process-those that precede silencing of future inactive X chromosomes-include randomly choosing the future active X, most likely by repressing its XIST locus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961030481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961030481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00439-011-1016-7

DO - 10.1007/s00439-011-1016-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 21655936

AN - SCOPUS:79961030481

VL - 130

SP - 281

EP - 293

JO - Human Genetics

JF - Human Genetics

SN - 0340-6717

IS - 2

ER -