The separate neural control of hand movements and contact forces

Vikram S Chib, Matthew A. Krutky, Kevin M. Lynch, Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To manipulate an object, we must simultaneously control the contact forces exerted on the object and the movements of our hand. Two alternative views for manipulation have been proposed: one in which motions and contact forces are represented and controlled by separate neural processes, and one in which motions and forces are controlled jointly, by a single process. To evaluate these alternatives, we designed three tasks in which subjects maintained a specified contact force while their hand was moved by a robotic manipulandum. The prescribed contact force and hand motions were selected in each task to induce the subject to attain one of three goals: (1) exerting a regulated contact force, (2) tracking the motion of the manipulandum, and (3) attaining both force and motion goals concurrently. By comparing subjects' performances in these three tasks, we found that behavior was captured by the summed actions of two independent control systems: one applying the desired force, and the other guiding the hand along the predicted path of the manipulandum. Furthermore, the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation impulses to the posterior parietal cortex selectively disrupted the control of motion but did not affect the regulation of static contact force. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that manipulation of objects is performed by independent brain control of hand motions and interaction forces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3939-3947
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume29
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 25 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hand
Parietal Lobe
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Robotics
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The separate neural control of hand movements and contact forces. / Chib, Vikram S; Krutky, Matthew A.; Lynch, Kevin M.; Mussa-Ivaldi, Ferdinando A.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 29, No. 12, 25.03.2009, p. 3939-3947.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chib, Vikram S ; Krutky, Matthew A. ; Lynch, Kevin M. ; Mussa-Ivaldi, Ferdinando A. / The separate neural control of hand movements and contact forces. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 12. pp. 3939-3947.
@article{f261a9f9d97e40329b04c29fceeae576,
title = "The separate neural control of hand movements and contact forces",
abstract = "To manipulate an object, we must simultaneously control the contact forces exerted on the object and the movements of our hand. Two alternative views for manipulation have been proposed: one in which motions and contact forces are represented and controlled by separate neural processes, and one in which motions and forces are controlled jointly, by a single process. To evaluate these alternatives, we designed three tasks in which subjects maintained a specified contact force while their hand was moved by a robotic manipulandum. The prescribed contact force and hand motions were selected in each task to induce the subject to attain one of three goals: (1) exerting a regulated contact force, (2) tracking the motion of the manipulandum, and (3) attaining both force and motion goals concurrently. By comparing subjects' performances in these three tasks, we found that behavior was captured by the summed actions of two independent control systems: one applying the desired force, and the other guiding the hand along the predicted path of the manipulandum. Furthermore, the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation impulses to the posterior parietal cortex selectively disrupted the control of motion but did not affect the regulation of static contact force. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that manipulation of objects is performed by independent brain control of hand motions and interaction forces.",
author = "Chib, {Vikram S} and Krutky, {Matthew A.} and Lynch, {Kevin M.} and Mussa-Ivaldi, {Ferdinando A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5856-08.2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "3939--3947",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The separate neural control of hand movements and contact forces

AU - Chib, Vikram S

AU - Krutky, Matthew A.

AU - Lynch, Kevin M.

AU - Mussa-Ivaldi, Ferdinando A.

PY - 2009/3/25

Y1 - 2009/3/25

N2 - To manipulate an object, we must simultaneously control the contact forces exerted on the object and the movements of our hand. Two alternative views for manipulation have been proposed: one in which motions and contact forces are represented and controlled by separate neural processes, and one in which motions and forces are controlled jointly, by a single process. To evaluate these alternatives, we designed three tasks in which subjects maintained a specified contact force while their hand was moved by a robotic manipulandum. The prescribed contact force and hand motions were selected in each task to induce the subject to attain one of three goals: (1) exerting a regulated contact force, (2) tracking the motion of the manipulandum, and (3) attaining both force and motion goals concurrently. By comparing subjects' performances in these three tasks, we found that behavior was captured by the summed actions of two independent control systems: one applying the desired force, and the other guiding the hand along the predicted path of the manipulandum. Furthermore, the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation impulses to the posterior parietal cortex selectively disrupted the control of motion but did not affect the regulation of static contact force. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that manipulation of objects is performed by independent brain control of hand motions and interaction forces.

AB - To manipulate an object, we must simultaneously control the contact forces exerted on the object and the movements of our hand. Two alternative views for manipulation have been proposed: one in which motions and contact forces are represented and controlled by separate neural processes, and one in which motions and forces are controlled jointly, by a single process. To evaluate these alternatives, we designed three tasks in which subjects maintained a specified contact force while their hand was moved by a robotic manipulandum. The prescribed contact force and hand motions were selected in each task to induce the subject to attain one of three goals: (1) exerting a regulated contact force, (2) tracking the motion of the manipulandum, and (3) attaining both force and motion goals concurrently. By comparing subjects' performances in these three tasks, we found that behavior was captured by the summed actions of two independent control systems: one applying the desired force, and the other guiding the hand along the predicted path of the manipulandum. Furthermore, the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation impulses to the posterior parietal cortex selectively disrupted the control of motion but did not affect the regulation of static contact force. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that manipulation of objects is performed by independent brain control of hand motions and interaction forces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64849090759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64849090759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5856-08.2009

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5856-08.2009

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 3939

EP - 3947

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 12

ER -