The semantic representation of nouns and verbs

Kevin Shapiro, Argye Hillis-Trupe, Alfonso Caramazza

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene 2 Introduction: What's in a name? For cognitive science, the question is more than rhetorical. Rather, it gets to the heart of what we know – and do not know – about how words are stored and retrieved by the human brain, and there are several competing ideas about how it should be approached. The question becomes even more complex when one considers that not all words are names, or nouns; a complete theory of lexical semantics should also account for the meaning of verbs, adjectives, and other so-called “content” words, associated with what many have argued are fundamentally different types of concepts (O'Grady, 1997). Where can we begin?: Sensory/functional approaches. One school of thought holds that there are roughly two kinds of semantic knowledge associated with the lexical entry for any given word. On the one hand, there is information that derives directly from the senses, including features representing an object's smell, color, size, and propensity to have sharp thorns. On the other hand, there is everything else – for example, the same item's monetary and sentimental value, where it can typically be found, and whether it is suitable for consumption as jam. The latter sort of information is often (somewhat imprecisely) called “associative” or “functional.” Accordingly, this method of partitioning the lexicon has been called the sensory/functional theory (SFT) of semantic knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNeural Basis of Semantic Memory
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages205-216
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9780511544965, 0521848709, 9780521848701
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Semantics
Smell
Names
Cognitive Science
Color
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Shapiro, K., Hillis-Trupe, A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). The semantic representation of nouns and verbs. In Neural Basis of Semantic Memory (pp. 205-216). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544965.009

The semantic representation of nouns and verbs. / Shapiro, Kevin; Hillis-Trupe, Argye; Caramazza, Alfonso.

Neural Basis of Semantic Memory. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 205-216.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Shapiro, K, Hillis-Trupe, A & Caramazza, A 2007, The semantic representation of nouns and verbs. in Neural Basis of Semantic Memory. Cambridge University Press, pp. 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544965.009
Shapiro K, Hillis-Trupe A, Caramazza A. The semantic representation of nouns and verbs. In Neural Basis of Semantic Memory. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 205-216 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544965.009
Shapiro, Kevin ; Hillis-Trupe, Argye ; Caramazza, Alfonso. / The semantic representation of nouns and verbs. Neural Basis of Semantic Memory. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 205-216
@inbook{c14330890b8747d59cf963f9ffcddb36,
title = "The semantic representation of nouns and verbs",
abstract = "That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene 2 Introduction: What's in a name? For cognitive science, the question is more than rhetorical. Rather, it gets to the heart of what we know – and do not know – about how words are stored and retrieved by the human brain, and there are several competing ideas about how it should be approached. The question becomes even more complex when one considers that not all words are names, or nouns; a complete theory of lexical semantics should also account for the meaning of verbs, adjectives, and other so-called “content” words, associated with what many have argued are fundamentally different types of concepts (O'Grady, 1997). Where can we begin?: Sensory/functional approaches. One school of thought holds that there are roughly two kinds of semantic knowledge associated with the lexical entry for any given word. On the one hand, there is information that derives directly from the senses, including features representing an object's smell, color, size, and propensity to have sharp thorns. On the other hand, there is everything else – for example, the same item's monetary and sentimental value, where it can typically be found, and whether it is suitable for consumption as jam. The latter sort of information is often (somewhat imprecisely) called “associative” or “functional.” Accordingly, this method of partitioning the lexicon has been called the sensory/functional theory (SFT) of semantic knowledge.",
author = "Kevin Shapiro and Argye Hillis-Trupe and Alfonso Caramazza",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511544965.009",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511544965",
pages = "205--216",
booktitle = "Neural Basis of Semantic Memory",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The semantic representation of nouns and verbs

AU - Shapiro, Kevin

AU - Hillis-Trupe, Argye

AU - Caramazza, Alfonso

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene 2 Introduction: What's in a name? For cognitive science, the question is more than rhetorical. Rather, it gets to the heart of what we know – and do not know – about how words are stored and retrieved by the human brain, and there are several competing ideas about how it should be approached. The question becomes even more complex when one considers that not all words are names, or nouns; a complete theory of lexical semantics should also account for the meaning of verbs, adjectives, and other so-called “content” words, associated with what many have argued are fundamentally different types of concepts (O'Grady, 1997). Where can we begin?: Sensory/functional approaches. One school of thought holds that there are roughly two kinds of semantic knowledge associated with the lexical entry for any given word. On the one hand, there is information that derives directly from the senses, including features representing an object's smell, color, size, and propensity to have sharp thorns. On the other hand, there is everything else – for example, the same item's monetary and sentimental value, where it can typically be found, and whether it is suitable for consumption as jam. The latter sort of information is often (somewhat imprecisely) called “associative” or “functional.” Accordingly, this method of partitioning the lexicon has been called the sensory/functional theory (SFT) of semantic knowledge.

AB - That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene 2 Introduction: What's in a name? For cognitive science, the question is more than rhetorical. Rather, it gets to the heart of what we know – and do not know – about how words are stored and retrieved by the human brain, and there are several competing ideas about how it should be approached. The question becomes even more complex when one considers that not all words are names, or nouns; a complete theory of lexical semantics should also account for the meaning of verbs, adjectives, and other so-called “content” words, associated with what many have argued are fundamentally different types of concepts (O'Grady, 1997). Where can we begin?: Sensory/functional approaches. One school of thought holds that there are roughly two kinds of semantic knowledge associated with the lexical entry for any given word. On the one hand, there is information that derives directly from the senses, including features representing an object's smell, color, size, and propensity to have sharp thorns. On the other hand, there is everything else – for example, the same item's monetary and sentimental value, where it can typically be found, and whether it is suitable for consumption as jam. The latter sort of information is often (somewhat imprecisely) called “associative” or “functional.” Accordingly, this method of partitioning the lexicon has been called the sensory/functional theory (SFT) of semantic knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52949113908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52949113908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511544965.009

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511544965.009

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:52949113908

SN - 9780511544965

SN - 0521848709

SN - 9780521848701

SP - 205

EP - 216

BT - Neural Basis of Semantic Memory

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -